Kuwait - Kuwait Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Al Qadsia vs Al Shabab: match statistics

Al Qadsia crest
Al Qadsia
4 : 1half-time 1:0
Al Shabab crest
Al Shabab
165%(1.44)
X22%(3.80)
213%(6.25)

Al Qadsia demonstrates significantly better home form with a 60% win rate and an impressive +9 goal difference on their own turf. The hosts average 2.6 goals per match in front of their home crowd while conceding just 0.8, indicating a solid defense. Al Shabab has weak away statistics—only 40% wins, a negative goal difference, and low efficiency (12% shot conversion rate). Superior possession (54% vs 41%) and higher xG values (1.47 vs 0.98) further favor the home side. The recent form of both teams (Al Qadsia: WLDWL, Al Shabab: DDWLL) confirms the advantage for Al Qadsia, who are expected to capitalize on home field advantage and secure the three points.

Al Qadsia vs Al Shabab: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Qadsia played Al Shabab in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match was played on 15 January 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Al Qadsia: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Shabab: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Qadsia scores 1.70 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Al Shabab scores 0.70 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Qadsia 40%, Al Shabab 40%. Over 2.5: Al Qadsia 50%, Al Shabab 30%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Al Qadsia has higher xG: 1.50 vs 0.97. Al Qadsia: 12.1 shots per match, Al Shabab: 8.5.

Match halves

Al Qadsia: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.00. Al Shabab: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Al Qadsia: 76-90+ (7 goals). Al Shabab: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kuwait Premier League: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Qadsia demonstrates significantly better home form with a 60% win rate and an impressive +9 goal difference on their own turf. The hosts average 2.6 goals per match in front of their home crowd while conceding just 0.8, indicating a solid defense. Al Shabab has weak away statistics—only 40% wins, a negative goal difference, and low efficiency (12% shot conversion rate). Superior possession (54% vs 41%) and higher xG values (1.47 vs 0.98) further favor the home side. The recent form of both teams (Al Qadsia: WLDWL, Al Shabab: DDWLL) confirms the advantage for Al Qadsia, who are expected to capitalize on home field advantage and secure the three points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
15Shots6
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
8Shots on target4
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
1.74xG0.87
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
5Corners4
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
33Dangerous attacks27
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
10Fouls12
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0Cards0
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.7Goals scored / match0.7
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0.7Goals conceded / match1.5
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
58%Average possession45%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
5.1Shots on target / match2.3
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.1Shots per match8.5
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
5.1Shots on target2.3
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
14%Shot conversion8.2%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
58%Possession45%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
1.5xG for0.97
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0.98xG against1.53
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

Shooting quality

Al Qadsia: Efficient finishingAl Shabab: Balanced
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
Accuracy (shots on target)42%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Qadsia is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Al Qadsia · 1.2 pts / match - Al Shabab

Al Qadsia
DWWLD
Season result split
40% W30% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-3
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Shabab
DDDWL
Season result split
30% W40% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-3
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Qadsia is 143% better for: goals scored per match.

1.7 goals / match - Al Qadsia · 0.7 goals / match - Al Shabab

Al Qadsia is 114% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.7 goals / match - Al Qadsia · 1.5 goals / match - Al Shabab

Al Qadsia scoring profile: strong

Al Qadsia scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Al Shabab keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Al Shabab scoring profile: mixed

Al Shabab scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Al Qadsia keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).

17Goals scored (season)7
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
7Goals conceded (season)15
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
2.4Average goals in match2.2
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal60%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
40%2 goals10%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
30%3 goals0%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
20%4 goals0%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal70%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
20%2 goals30%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0%3 goals20%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0%4 goals20%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
30%Scored in both halves0%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
20%BTTS - last 560%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Shabab is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Al Qadsia · 1.4 pts / match - Al Shabab

Al Qadsia - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing
Al Shabab - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.4
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.3
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
1.1Average goals (1st half)0.6
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
70%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
70%No goal before half-time70%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

After half-time (2nd half)

1.9Points per match (2nd half)0.9
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
0.3Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
70%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab
30%No goal after half-time70%
Al QadsiaAl Shabab

Al Qadsia - second-half results

50% W40% D10% L
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Shabab - second-half results

20% W30% D50% L
14
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Qadsia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Al Shabab - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.01.6
Average goals in match0.22.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Qadsia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
7
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Al Shabab
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
0
3
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Qadsia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Al Shabab

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al QadsiaLigaAl Shabab
Average goals in match 2.402.47 2.20
Both teams scored 40%45% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%43% 30%
Clean sheets 50%32% 30%
Goal before half-time 60%68% 50%
Goal after half-time 80%77% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al QadsiaGoalAblay Mbengue
  2. Al QadsiaGoalAblay Mbengue
  3. Al QadsiaGoalNeeskens Kebano
  4. Al QadsiaGoalAbdulla Al Awadi

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Qadsia 0 - 1 - 0 Al Shabab. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Al Shabab
1 : 1
Al Qadsia

FAQ

What was the result of Al Qadsia vs Al Shabab?

The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Qadsia 4:1 Al Shabab. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Qadsia vs Al Shabab?

Al Qadsia score 1.70 goals per game on average and Al Shabab 0.70. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Al Qadsia's matches and 40% of Al Shabab's.

What form are Al Qadsia and Al Shabab in?

Over the last 5 games Al Qadsia have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Shabab 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Qadsia vs Al Shabab?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Qadsia vs Al Shabab: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.