Al Quadisiya vs Al Nassr: match statistics
Al Quadisiya vs Al Nassr: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Quadisiya played Al Nassr in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Al Quadisiya: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Nassr: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Quadisiya scores 2.37 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Al Nassr scores 2.70 and concedes 0.70. League average: 3.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Quadisiya 67%, Al Nassr 43%. Over 2.5: Al Quadisiya 70%, Al Nassr 63%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Al Nassr has higher xG: 2.15 vs 1.74. Al Quadisiya: 14.9 shots per match, Al Nassr: 18.6.
Match halves
Al Quadisiya: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.40. Al Nassr: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 1.63.
Goals by minute
Al Quadisiya: 76-90+ (19 goals). Al Nassr: 76-90+ (27 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (Al Nassr); the team occupies 1st place versus Al Quadisiya’s 4th and has 26 wins this season compared to the home side’s 19, with a goal difference of 81–21 versus 71–31. Offensively Al Nassr shows superior productivity and chance quality: on the road they average 2.67 goals with 18.6 shots and 6.67 on target and xG_for 2.12, while Al Quadisiya at home averages 2.33 goals, 15.2 shots, 5.13 on target and xG_for 1.78. The last-5 form strongly favors the visitors: Al Nassr has won 5 of 5, scoring 14 and conceding 1 (PPG 3.0), whereas Al Quadisiya’s last 5 read 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, 12 goals scored and 8 conceded (PPG 1.6). Defensively Al Nassr also looks more solid — they concede 0.73 goals per away match and record 60% clean sheets, versus 0.8 goals conceded for the hosts and 40% clean sheets; furthermore the visitors have 0% games without scoring away versus 7% for the hosts. Although the home side have slightly higher shot conversion (15% vs 14%) and marginally greater possession (61% vs 60%), the advantage in chance volume, xG and form leads me to set probabilities at 15% for the home win, 20% for a draw and 65% for an Al Nassr victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams possess significant attacking potential — Al Quadisiya averages 2.73 goals per game and Al Nassr 2.67, with xG 2.17 vs 2.12 — which nominally supports a BTTS scenario. However, Al Nassr demonstrates very solid defense: they concede only 0.73 goals per game on the season and have 60% clean sheets, and in the last 5 matches they conceded just 1 goal (0.2 per game). Al Quadisiya, on the other hand, had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and scored 2.4 goals while conceding 1.6 on average, showing offensive vulnerability. Season BTTS rates are 47% and 40% for home and away (avg ≈44%), while the league has 59% BTTS, so the teams’ individual figures are below the league trend. Therefore I assign 35% to 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes) and 65% to 'No' (No Goal) and recommend a bet on 'No' due to Al Nassr's high clean sheet rate and recent defensive form.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams display strong attacking output: Al Quadisiya averages 2.73 goals per match, Al Nassr 2.67, and their xG are 2.17 (home) and 2.12 (away) respectively. Matching attack to opponent defense (xG conceded: Al Nassr 0.77, Al Quadisiya 0.79) the model yields expected 1.47 goals for the home side and 1.46 for the visitors, ~2.93 goals combined. Seasonal indicators confirm a high-scoring profile: Over 1.5 appears in 80% of Al Quadisiya’s matches and 93% of Al Nassr’s (average ~87%), so I assess Over 1.5 at 87%. For the 2.5 line seasonal rates are 60%/67% (average 63%), but a Poisson model for a 2.93 mean gives Over 2.5 ~56%, therefore I compromise and estimate Over 2.5 at 60%, and Over 3.5 at about 37% (seasonal 40%/53% vs Poisson ~34%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Nassr are in clear form: they have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100%) and have led at the break in 4 of those 5 games (80%), averaging 1.6 goals scored by half-time and 0.2 conceded. Al Quadisiya, despite a season-long 60% rate of leading at the break in their last 5 matches, have led only once in that sample (20%) and averaged 0.8 goals by half-time with 1.0 conceded. Over the season both teams generate similar xG (2.17 for the home side versus 2.12 for the visitors) and record a comparable number of shots (around 18.7 on average), but Al Nassr have recently converted better and held leads more reliably. For these reasons the most likely scenario is Al Nassr leading at half-time and winning after full-time (2/2) — I assign this a 34% probability, with an alternative 22% for a draw at half-time followed by an away win (x/2) and 12% for draw/draw (x/x).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Quadisiya | Al Nassr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Nassr is 88% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Al Quadisiya · 3 pts / match - Al Nassr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Nassr is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
2.37 goals / match - Al Quadisiya · 2.7 goals / match - Al Nassr
Al Nassr is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.03 goals / match - Al Quadisiya · 0.7 goals / match - Al Nassr
Al Quadisiya scores in 93% of matches (28 of 30 matches), while Al Nassr keeps a clean sheet in 57% (17 of 30 matches).
Al Nassr scores in 100% of matches (30 of 30 matches), while Al Quadisiya keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Quadisiya
Over / Under - Al Nassr
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Nassr is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.73 pts / match - Al Quadisiya · 2.2 pts / match - Al Nassr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Quadisiya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Nassr - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 87%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (27 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +23 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Quadisiya
Al Nassr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Quadisiya | Liga | Al Nassr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.40 | 3.03 | ▲ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 56% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 23% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 81% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Quadisiya 1 - 0 - 0 Al Nassr. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Quadisiya vs Al Nassr?
The Professional League match finished Al Quadisiya 3:1 Al Nassr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Quadisiya vs Al Nassr?
Al Quadisiya score 2.37 goals per game on average and Al Nassr 2.70. The Professional League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Al Quadisiya's matches and 43% of Al Nassr's.
What form are Al Quadisiya and Al Nassr in?
Over the last 5 games Al Quadisiya have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Nassr 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Quadisiya vs Al Nassr?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Quadisiya vs Al Nassr: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


