Kuwait - Kuwait Premier LeagueData current as of 21 October 2026

Al Shabab vs Kazma: match statistics

Al Shabab crest
Al Shabab
2 : 3half-time 1:1
Kazma crest
Kazma

Al Shabab vs Kazma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Shabab played Kazma in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Al Shabab: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Kazma: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Shabab scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Kazma scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.88 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Shabab 100%, Kazma 50%. Over 2.5: Al Shabab 50%, Kazma 50%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Kazma has higher xG: 2.47 vs 1.44. Al Shabab: 10.0 shots per match, Kazma: 18.5.

Match halves

Al Shabab: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00. Kazma: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Al Shabab: 16-30 (1 goals). Kazma: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kuwait Premier League: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kazma remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while Al Shabab have lost 2 games during this period. The visitors have scored 8 goals in their last five appearances, but more importantly, they have conceded just 2, which stands in clear contrast to the 9 goals conceded by the hosts. Al Shabab can be dangerous at home, where they average 3 goals per match and 4 shots on target, but they also concede an average of 2 goals and have yet to keep a clean sheet there. The hosts have an xG of 1.17 and allow opponents an xG of 0.99; however, their recent defensive run suggests greater risk than the limited home data indicates. Kazma’s higher position in the table—second compared with fifth—as well as their significantly more solid defence, point towards a narrow victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for goals from both sides comes primarily from current form: Al Shabab have recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, while Kazma have done so in 40%, with each team averaging 1.6 goals scored. The hosts are clearly vulnerable defensively, conceding 9 goals during this period, or 1.8 per match, while their average xG against is 1.50. Kazma have recently created chances worth an average of 1.76 xG per game, which is a strong argument for them to score despite conceding only 2 goals in five appearances. Al Shabab should also find a way to score, as they average 21.5 shots and generate 2.65 xG at home, although Kazma’s solid defence increases the risk of a No Goal scenario for one of the sides. With the league BTTS average standing at 67%, the “BTTS - Yes” outcome remains more likely, but the edge is not significant due to the visitors’ recent defensive form.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals, as Al Shabab’s last five matches produced an average of 3.4 goals, with the team scoring 1.6 and conceding 1.8 per game. During the same period, Kazma averaged 1.6 goals scored, while its matches featured an average of 2.0 goals, despite the defence conceding only 0.4 goals per game. As many as 80% of Al Shabab’s recent matches and 60% of Kazma’s fixtures went over 2.5 goals, while the league average stands at 2.75 goals. The hosts create chances worth 2.65 xG at home and average 21.5 shots, while their recent xG against stands at 1.50, which should allow the visitors to create chances of their own. The 1.5 line offers a clearly greater margin of safety than Over 2.5, although the projected 2.65 goals still provides slight support for the higher-scoring option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kazma win at the final whistle. Kazma remain unbeaten in their last five matches, averaging 2.2 points per game, while Al Shabab have lost two of their last five outings and average 1.4 points. The visitors were level at the break in 60% of those matches and never went into half-time behind, whereas the hosts were level at the interval in only 20% of games and trailed in 40%. After the break, Kazma score an average of 1.0 goal and concede just 0.2, while Al Shabab concede as many as 1.4 goals per match in this period. The hosts' advantage in the match data is based on a very small sample of just two games, despite their home xG of 2.65; therefore, Kazma's superior current form and defensive stability support a turnaround in favour of the visitors after an evenly matched first half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Al ShababKazma
8Shots18
Al ShababKazma
3Shots on target9
Al ShababKazma
0.94xG2.24
Al ShababKazma
5Corners2
Al ShababKazma
30Dangerous attacks66
Al ShababKazma
8Fouls10
Al ShababKazma
0Cards0
Al ShababKazma

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.5
Al ShababKazma
1.5Goals conceded / match0.5
Al ShababKazma
51%Average possession54%
Al ShababKazma
5.5Shots on target / match4
Al ShababKazma

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match18.5
Al ShababKazma
5.5Shots on target4
Al ShababKazma
20%Shot conversion8.1%
Al ShababKazma
51%Possession54%
Al ShababKazma
1.44xG for2.47
Al ShababKazma
1.12xG against0.88
Al ShababKazma

Shooting quality

Al Shabab: Efficient finishingKazma: Attacking
Al ShababKazma
Accuracy (shots on target)55%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Shabab
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Kazma
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 2.47Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Shabab is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Al Shabab · 1.5 goals / match - Kazma

Kazma is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Al Shabab · 0.5 goals / match - Kazma

Al Shabab scoring profile: very strong

Al Shabab scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Kazma keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Kazma scoring profile: very strong

Kazma scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Al Shabab keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)3
Al ShababKazma
3Goals conceded (season)1
Al ShababKazma
3.5Average goals in match2
Al ShababKazma
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Al ShababKazma
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Al ShababKazma

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
Al ShababKazma
50%2 goals50%
Al ShababKazma
50%3 goals50%
Al ShababKazma
0%4 goals0%
Al ShababKazma

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Al ShababKazma
50%2 goals0%
Al ShababKazma
0%3 goals0%
Al ShababKazma
0%4 goals0%
Al ShababKazma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al ShababKazma
50%Scored in both halves50%
Al ShababKazma

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Al ShababKazma
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al ShababKazma
100%BTTS - last 550%
Al ShababKazma

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Al ShababKazma

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Al ShababKazma

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Shabab is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - Al Shabab · 1 pts / match - Kazma

Al Shabab - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Kazma - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)1
Al ShababKazma
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Al ShababKazma
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Al ShababKazma
1Average goals (1st half)1
Al ShababKazma
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%No goal before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)2
Al ShababKazma
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Al ShababKazma
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Al ShababKazma
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1
Al ShababKazma
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Al ShababKazma
50%No goal after half-time50%
Al ShababKazma

Al Shabab - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.5

Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kazma - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Shabab - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.50
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.5
Average goals in match1.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kazma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Shabab
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
3
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Kazma
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Shabab

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Kazma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
29%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al ShababLigaKazma
Average goals in match▲ 3.502.88▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%59%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%59%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 0%24%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%71%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%76%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Michel Ângelo Dias de Lima⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Nasser Al-Gahwashi⚽ 1
—Shabaib Al Khaldi⚽ 1
—Törless Tim Knöll⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KazmaGoalShabaib Al Khaldi
  2. Al ShababGoalMichel Ângelo Dias de Lima
  3. KazmaGoalNasser Al-Gahwashi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Al Shabab 0 - 1 - 1 Kazma. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Al Shabab
0 : 2
Kazma
Kazma
1 : 1
Al Shabab

FAQ

What was the result of Al Shabab vs Kazma?

The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Shabab 2:3 Kazma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Al Shabab and Kazma?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Shabab won 0, Kazma won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Shabab vs Kazma?

Al Shabab score 2.00 goals per game on average and Kazma 1.50. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Al Shabab's matches and 50% of Kazma's.

What form are Al Shabab and Kazma in?

Over the last 5 games Al Shabab have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Kazma 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Shabab vs Kazma?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.