Al Shamal vs Al Sadd: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Shamal played Al Sadd in Stars League (Qatar). The match was played on 29 December 2025. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Al Shamal: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Sadd: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Shamal scores 2.30 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Al Sadd scores 2.50 and concedes 1.40. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Shamal 50%, Al Sadd 60%. Over 2.5: Al Shamal 60%, Al Sadd 60%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Al Sadd has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.78. Al Shamal: 15.1 shots per match, Al Sadd: 15.6.

Match halves

Al Shamal: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.30. Al Sadd: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

Al Shamal: 31-45+ (6 goals). Al Sadd: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Stars League: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Al ShamalAl Sadd
15Shots12
Al ShamalAl Sadd
4Shots on target5
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1.59xG1.45
Al ShamalAl Sadd
3Corners2
Al ShamalAl Sadd
50Dangerous attacks47
Al ShamalAl Sadd
13Fouls8
Al ShamalAl Sadd
2Cards2
Al ShamalAl Sadd

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.3Goals scored / match2.5
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1Goals conceded / match1.4
Al ShamalAl Sadd
50%Average possession57%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
6.4Shots on target / match6.3
Al ShamalAl Sadd

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.1Shots per match15.6
Al ShamalAl Sadd
6.4Shots on target6.3
Al ShamalAl Sadd
15.2%Shot conversion16%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
50%Possession57%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1.78xG for1.84
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1.28xG against1.47
Al ShamalAl Sadd

Shooting quality

Al Shamal: AttackingAl Sadd: Dominant
Al ShamalAl Sadd
Accuracy (shots on target)42%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Sadd is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Al Shamal · 2 pts / match - Al Sadd

Al Shamal
DLWDW
Season result split
60% W30% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-1
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Al Sadd
DLWWW
Season result split
50% W20% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-3
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Sadd is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

2.3 goals / match - Al Shamal · 2.5 goals / match - Al Sadd

Al Shamal is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Al Shamal · 1.4 goals / match - Al Sadd

Al Shamal scoring profile: very strong

Al Shamal scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Al Sadd keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Al Sadd scoring profile: strong

Al Sadd scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Al Shamal keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

23Goals scored (season)25
Al ShamalAl Sadd
10Goals conceded (season)14
Al ShamalAl Sadd
3.3Average goals in match3.9
Al ShamalAl Sadd
12Goals scored (last 5)17
Al ShamalAl Sadd
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Al ShamalAl Sadd

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal80%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
70%2 goals70%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
40%3 goals30%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
30%4 goals20%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal70%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
40%2 goals40%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
0%3 goals30%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
0%4 goals0%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time30%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
10%BTTS in both halves10%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
70%Scored in both halves40%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
40%BTTS - last 580%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time30%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Sadd is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Al Shamal · 1.7 pts / match - Al Sadd

Al Shamal - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Al Sadd - half-time state
50% leading20% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.7
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Al ShamalAl Sadd
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.7
Al ShamalAl Sadd
60%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
30%No goal before half-time40%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

After half-time (2nd half)

2.1Points per match (2nd half)1.8
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1.3Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Al ShamalAl Sadd
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
Al ShamalAl Sadd
1.7Average goals (2nd half)2.2
Al ShamalAl Sadd
70%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Al ShamalAl Sadd
20%No goal after half-time40%
Al ShamalAl Sadd

Al Shamal - second-half results

60% W30% R10% P
16
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Sadd - second-half results

50% W30% R20% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Shamal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Al Sadd - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.42.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.42.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+2+7
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Shamal
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Al Sadd
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Shamal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Al Sadd

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
160%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Stars League).

Teams vs league

Al ShamalLigaAl Sadd
Average goals in match 3.303.33 3.90
Both teams scored 50%56% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%59% 60%
Clean sheets 40%24% 30%
Goal before half-time 80%73% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%86% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.56
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Salman Salman Ahmad FalahiMatches officiated: 8
4.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins0%Draws50%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Al Shamal vs Al Sadd?

The Stars League match finished Al Shamal 0:3 Al Sadd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Shamal vs Al Sadd?

Al Shamal score 2.30 goals per game on average and Al Sadd 2.50. The Stars League average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Al Shamal's matches and 60% of Al Sadd's.

What form are Al Shamal and Al Sadd in?

Over the last 5 games Al Shamal have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Sadd 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Shamal vs Al Sadd?

The statistical background for Al Shamal vs Al Sadd — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.