Al Shamal vs Qatar SC: match statistics
Al Shamal vs Qatar SC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Shamal played Qatar SC in Stars League (Qatar). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Al Shamal: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Qatar SC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Shamal scores 1.70 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Qatar SC scores 1.55 and concedes 1.55. League average: 3.32 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Shamal 45%, Qatar SC 65%. Over 2.5: Al Shamal 55%, Qatar SC 50%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Al Shamal has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.47. Al Shamal: 15.1 shots per match, Qatar SC: 13.3.
Match halves
Al Shamal: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.95. Qatar SC: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.10.
Goals by minute
Al Shamal: 31-45+ (8 goals). Qatar SC: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Stars League: 3.32 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a home win (Al Shamal) because at home they average 1.9 goals per game with xG 1.72 and 5.4 shots on target, while Qatar SC as the away team scores 1.4 goals with xG 1.45 and 4.1 shots on target. Al Shamal sit 2nd in the table with 34 goals scored and 25 conceded this season, whereas Qatar SC have 31 scored and 31 conceded, indicating a home advantage in goal balance and defense. The hosts keep 40% clean sheets at home and win 50% of matches at their stadium, while the visitors have only 10% clean sheets on the road and a 30% away win rate, giving Al Shamal an organizational edge. In the last 5 matches Al Shamal scored 6 goals and average 1.8 points per game, and Qatar SC scored 8 goals in their last 5 and average 1.6 points per game, but conceded 8 goals — the visitors are more unstable defensively. Considering the higher xG 1.72 vs 1.45, better conversion rate 13% vs 11% and advantage in shots on target 5.4 vs 4.1, I assign Al Shamal a 62% chance to win, 18% for a draw and 20% for a Qatar SC win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS comes from seasonal percentages: Al Shamal has BTTS in 60% of matches, Qatar SC in 70%, and the league average is 60%, indicating a propensity for both teams to score. Both sides produce similar xG — 1.49 for Al Shamal and 1.45 for Qatar — with xG against of 1.58 and 1.44 respectively, yielding combined expected goals of ~2.94 and favoring goal exchange. In the last 5 matches Al Shamal scored 6 goals (1.2 per match) and conceded 7 (1.4), Qatar scored 8 (1.6) and conceded 8 (1.6); recent BTTS rates are 40% versus 60%, so form also supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Additionally, both teams register comparable shots (13.7 vs 13.0) and shots on target (4.1 vs 4.1) with conversion rates of 12% and 11%, and Qatar has only 10% clean sheets versus 40% for Al Shamal, which reduces the likelihood of a No Goal outcome. Therefore I assign 75% to BTTS - Yes and 25% to No Goal — the 'yes' pick is the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Al Shamal scores an average of 1.7 goals per match (xG 1.49), while Qatar SC averages 1.4 goals (xG 1.45); based on season-long data and the last 5 matches I project ~1.49 xG for the home side and ~1.54 for the visitors, totaling 3.03 expected goals. Seasonally Over 1.5 occurs in 90% of Al Shamal’s matches and 70% of Qatar SC’s matches (average 80%), and the model based on combined xG=3.03 yields about an 81% probability for Over 1.5, making this line the strongest signal. Over 2.5 has moderate support: both teams have a 50% seasonal rate for Over 2.5, the league records 64% of such games, and the model gives ~58% probability for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 looks unlikely — seasonally 40% (home) and 30% (away), and the model gives only ~36% for Over 3.5, so Under 3.5 (64%) is safer. Additionally, BTTS occurs in 60% of Al Shamal’s matches and 70% of Qatar SC’s, which reinforces the Over 1.5 pick since both teams frequently score.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Shamal are slight favorites: seasonally they win 50% of matches versus 30% for Qatar SC and average 1.7 points per game compared to 1.2 for the visitors; the hosts’ xG is 1.49 against the visitors’ 1.45, so the advantage is moderate. First-half signals point to a draw — Al Shamal score an average of 0.6 goals by the break, Qatar only 0.3, and the visitors concede on average 0.3 goals by half-time while keeping a clean sheet at the break in 80% of matches, which raises the probability of a tied score after 45 minutes. However, second-half play is more goal-prone: average goals in second halves are 1.9 in Al Shamal’s matches and 2.2 in Qatar’s matches, and the proportion of matches with at least one goal after the break is 100% for the hosts and 90% for the visitors, so turnarounds after half-time are very likely. Additionally, Al Shamal show better recent form — 60% wins in their last five matches and leading at the break in 40% of cases — and slightly superior shot efficiency (conversion 12% versus 11%), which favors a host win in the second half. On this basis the most reliable signal is Half-Time/Full-Time draw at the break and Al Shamal to win after 90 minutes (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Shamal | Qatar SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Shamal is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Al Shamal · 1.6 pts / match - Qatar SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Shamal is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.7 goals / match - Al Shamal · 1.55 goals / match - Qatar SC
Al Shamal is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Al Shamal · 1.55 goals / match - Qatar SC
Al Shamal scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Qatar SC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
Qatar SC scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Al Shamal keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Shamal
Over / Under - Qatar SC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Shamal is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Al Shamal · 1.35 pts / match - Qatar SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Shamal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Qatar SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Shamal
Qatar SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Stars League).
Teams vs league
| Al Shamal | Liga | Qatar SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.95 | 3.32 | ▼ 3.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 60% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 64% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 22% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 85% | 88% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Shamal 0 - 1 - 0 Qatar SC. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Shamal vs Qatar SC?
The Stars League match finished Al Shamal 0:2 Qatar SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Shamal vs Qatar SC?
Al Shamal score 1.70 goals per game on average and Qatar SC 1.55. The Stars League average is 3.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Al Shamal's matches and 65% of Qatar SC's.
What form are Al Shamal and Qatar SC in?
Over the last 5 games Al Shamal have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Qatar SC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Shamal vs Qatar SC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


