Al Ta'ee vs Al Bukayriyah: match statistics
Al Ta'ee vs Al Bukayriyah: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Ta'ee played Al Bukayriyah in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Al Ta'ee: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Al Bukayriyah: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Ta'ee scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Al Bukayriyah scores 1.11 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Ta'ee 59%, Al Bukayriyah 56%. Over 2.5: Al Ta'ee 59%, Al Bukayriyah 59%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ta'ee has higher xG: 1.33 vs 0.98. Al Ta'ee: 10.3 shots per match, Al Bukayriyah: 7.9.
Match halves
Al Ta'ee: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 1.04. Al Bukayriyah: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
Al Ta'ee: 76-90+ (15 goals). Al Bukayriyah: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (Al Ta'ee). They show a clear advantage in chance creation: on average 11.69 shots and 4.85 on target per home match versus 7.08 shots and 2.69 on target for Al Bukayriyah away. That translates into quality — Al Ta'ee’s home xG is 1.46 versus 0.94 xG for the visitors away, and finishing yields 1.46 goals for the hosts versus 1.08 goals per away match for the visitors. In the last 5 fixtures the hosts scored 6 goals and average 1.4 points per match, while the visitors have 4 goals and only 0.8 points per match, confirming better form for the locals. Defensively the hosts concede 1.62 goals at home on average and the visitors 1.46 away, but xG against for the visitors on the road is 1.7 versus just 0.96 xG against for the hosts at home, suggesting more created opportunities for Al Ta'ee. Considering the edge in shots, xG, recent form and the fact that goal difference in the hosts' home games is -2 versus -5 for the visitors away, I assign a higher probability to a home win with a moderate chance of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 50% (Al Ta'ee) and 62% (Al Bukayriyah), while the league average BTTS is 62% — additionally both teams record 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches, indicating a recurring pattern. Goal stats show Al Ta'ee scores 1.14 goals per match and Al Bukayriyah 1.08, while they concede 1.36 and 1.46 respectively, meaning both teams concede more than they score, which increases the likelihood of goal exchanges. xG analysis confirms this trend — Al Ta'ee xG for is 1.01 versus xG against 1.25, and Al Bukayriyah xG for is 0.94 versus xG against 1.70; in the last 5 matches xG for are 1.11 and 1.09, and xG against 1.64 and 1.49, suggesting chances created alongside vulnerability to conceding. Additionally Al Ta'ee averages 8.79 shots (2.79 on target) vs 7.08 (2.69 on target) for the away side, conversion rates are 13% and 15%, and clean sheets occur less frequently for the away team (15% vs 29% for the home side), reducing the chance of a no-goal outcome for one side. Considering the 62% league BTTS, 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches for both teams, higher average goals conceded (1.36 and 1.46) and significantly higher xG against (1.25 and 1.70), I recommend BTTS = Yes with a probability of 70% versus 30% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining both teams' xG yields about 1.36 goals for Al Ta'ee (attacking xG 1.01 versus the 1.70 xG Al Bukayriyah typically concedes) and 1.10 for Al Bukayriyah (attacking xG 0.94 versus the 1.25 xG Al Ta'ee typically concedes), totaling ~2.46 goals. Seasonal averages confirm this picture: Al Ta'ee scores 1.14 and concedes 1.36 per match, Al Bukayriyah scores 1.08 and concedes 1.46; in the last 5 matches Al Ta'ee averaged 1.2 goals while Al Bukayriyah 0.8 (recent xG 1.11 vs 1.09). Over statistics show at least 2 goals occur frequently – Over 1.5: 57% (Al Ta'ee) and 85% (Al Bukayriyah); Over 2.5: 50% and 69%; Over 3.5: 29% and 8% – which gives a strong signal for Over 1.5 and a moderate signal for Over 2.5. Additionally, BTTS is 50% (Al Ta'ee) and 62% (Al Bukayriyah), and total shots on target are 5.48 (2.79+2.69), supporting a both-teams-to-score scenario and at least two goals. As a result the best line to play is Over 1.5 (estimated probability ~76%); Over 2.5 is assessed as moderately likely (~59%), and Over 3.5 as unlikely (~18%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time I favour a draw: Al Ta'ee were level at the break in 43% of matches and Al Bukayriyah in 31%, which signals a high frequency of draws at half-time (around 40%). After the break the hosts have the edge — Al Ta'ee average 0.71 goals in the second half versus 0.46 for the visitors and win the second half in 43% of cases, while Al Bukayriyah do so in only 15%. Additionally the hosts have a higher overall win rate (43% versus 38% for the visitors), higher offensive xG of 1.01 versus 0.94 and the visitors concede more xG against (1.7), which increases Al Ta'ee’s chances of a turnaround or tipping the result after the break. Therefore the most probable HT/FT scenario is draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ta'ee | Al Bukayriyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Ta'ee is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Al Ta'ee · 0.8 pts / match - Al Bukayriyah
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ta'ee is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.44 goals / match - Al Ta'ee · 1.11 goals / match - Al Bukayriyah
Al Ta'ee scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Al Bukayriyah keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
Al Bukayriyah scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Al Ta'ee keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Ta'ee
Over / Under - Al Bukayriyah
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Bukayriyah is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Al Ta'ee · 1.26 pts / match - Al Bukayriyah
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ta'ee - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Bukayriyah - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Ta'ee
Al Bukayriyah
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Ta'ee | Liga | Al Bukayriyah | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.89 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 59% | 60% | • 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 26% | 22% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 84% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al BukayriyahSubstitutionOn: Ibrahim Ali Ibrahim Tamah JaafariOff: Nasser bin Mahdi bin Hassan Kaabi
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Ta'ee 1 - 0 - 0 Al Bukayriyah. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ta'ee vs Al Bukayriyah?
The First Division match finished Al Ta'ee 2:0 Al Bukayriyah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ta'ee vs Al Bukayriyah?
Al Ta'ee score 1.44 goals per game on average and Al Bukayriyah 1.11. The First Division average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Al Ta'ee's matches and 56% of Al Bukayriyah's.
What form are Al Ta'ee and Al Bukayriyah in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ta'ee have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Bukayriyah 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ta'ee vs Al Bukayriyah?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


