Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Al Taawon vs Al Hazm: match statistics

Al Taawon crest
Al Taawon
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
165%(1.73)
X22%(3.60)
213%(4.50)

Al Taawon presents decidedly better form and statistics, occupying 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins this season. The hosts win as many as 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.29 goals per match while conceding only 1.14, which translates to a positive goal difference of +8. Al Hazm sits in 11th position with just 38% away wins and a high rate of 38% matches without scoring a goal on the road. The guests concede an average of 1.25 goals per away match, and their recent form (1.2 points per match) is significantly weaker than the hosts (1.8 points). Additionally, Al Taawon possesses better shot conversion (19% vs 12%) and higher ball possession (52% vs 44%), giving them a clear advantage in this clash. All key statistical indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.

Al Taawon vs Al Hazm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Taawon played Al Hazm in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 22 January 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Al Taawon: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Al Hazm: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Taawon scores 2.20 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Al Hazm scores 1.00 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Taawon 53%, Al Hazm 60%. Over 2.5: Al Taawon 53%, Al Hazm 60%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Al Taawon has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.26. Al Taawon: 11.3 shots per match, Al Hazm: 11.2.

Match halves

Al Taawon: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.13. Al Hazm: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Al Taawon: 61-75 (8 goals). Al Hazm: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Taawon presents decidedly better form and statistics, occupying 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins this season. The hosts win as many as 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.29 goals per match while conceding only 1.14, which translates to a positive goal difference of +8. Al Hazm sits in 11th position with just 38% away wins and a high rate of 38% matches without scoring a goal on the road. The guests concede an average of 1.25 goals per away match, and their recent form (1.2 points per match) is significantly weaker than the hosts (1.8 points). Additionally, Al Taawon possesses better shot conversion (19% vs 12%) and higher ball possession (52% vs 44%), giving them a clear advantage in this clash. All key statistical indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Al TaawonAl Hazm
5Shots11
Al TaawonAl Hazm
4Shots on target6
Al TaawonAl Hazm
0.83xG1.32
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7Corners1
Al TaawonAl Hazm
33Dangerous attacks30
Al TaawonAl Hazm
9Fouls9
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1Cards1
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.2Goals scored / match1
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.13Goals conceded / match1.8
Al TaawonAl Hazm
49%Average possession47%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
4.4Shots on target / match3.73
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.27Shots per match11.2
Al TaawonAl Hazm
4.4Shots on target3.73
Al TaawonAl Hazm
19.5%Shot conversion8.9%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
49%Possession47%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.27xG for1.26
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.5xG against1.49
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Shooting quality

Al Taawon: Efficient finishingAl Hazm: Balanced
Al TaawonAl Hazm
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Taawon is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Al Taawon · 1.2 pts / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon
WLWLW
Season result split
73% W7% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-3
2.27 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Hazm
WLLWL
Season result split
27% W27% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-7
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Taawon is 120% better for: goals scored per match.

2.2 goals / match - Al Taawon · 1 goals / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Al Taawon · 1.8 goals / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon scoring profile: very strong

Al Taawon scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

Al Hazm scoring profile: strong

Al Hazm scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

33Goals scored (season)15
Al TaawonAl Hazm
17Goals conceded (season)27
Al TaawonAl Hazm
3.33Average goals in match2.8
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Al TaawonAl Hazm
4Goals conceded (last 5)13
Al TaawonAl Hazm

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal60%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
60%2 goals33%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
33%3 goals7%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
20%4 goals0%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal87%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
27%2 goals53%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7%3 goals20%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7%4 goals13%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time20%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
40%Scored in both halves7%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
40%BTTS - last 580%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Taawon is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.13 pts / match - Al Taawon · 1.07 pts / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon - half-time state
60% leading33% draw7% trailing
Al Hazm - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.13Points per match (1st half)1.07
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.07Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Al TaawonAl Hazm
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.27Average goals (1st half)1
Al TaawonAl Hazm
80%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
40%No goal before half-time73%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per match (2nd half)0.8
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Al TaawonAl Hazm
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
Al TaawonAl Hazm
2.07Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Al TaawonAl Hazm
40%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
33%No goal after half-time60%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Al Taawon - second-half results

40% W33% R27% P
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hazm - second-half results

13% W40% R47% P
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Taawon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match0.83.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
4
0
16-30
6
2
31-45
4
5
46-60
8
3
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.93
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al TaawonLigaAl Hazm
Average goals in match 3.333.09 2.80
Both teams scored 53%62% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%58% 60%
Clean sheets 33%22% 13%
Goal before half-time 67%73% 53%
Goal after half-time 93%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ali Mohammed Sawia Al QahtaniMatches officiated: 11
3.64Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 245%Home wins45%Draws9%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?

The Professional League match finished Al Taawon 2:2 Al Hazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?

Al Taawon score 2.20 goals per game on average and Al Hazm 1.00. The Professional League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Al Taawon's matches and 60% of Al Hazm's.

What form are Al Taawon and Al Hazm in?

Over the last 5 games Al Taawon have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Al Hazm 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.