Al Taawon vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Taawon played Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 23 November 2025. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Al Taawon: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Neom SC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Taawon scores 2.88 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Neom SC scores 1.50 and concedes 1.63. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Taawon 63%, Neom SC 75%. Over 2.5: Al Taawon 75%, Neom SC 63%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.32. Al Taawon: 11.9 shots per match, Neom SC: 12.4.

Match halves

Al Taawon: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 1.63. Neom SC: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Al Taawon: 61-75 (6 goals). Neom SC: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Al TaawonNeom SC
8Shots15
Al TaawonNeom SC
2Shots on target2
Al TaawonNeom SC
0.91xG1.3
Al TaawonNeom SC
8Corners1
Al TaawonNeom SC
37Dangerous attacks31
Al TaawonNeom SC
11Fouls16
Al TaawonNeom SC
3Cards3
Al TaawonNeom SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.88Goals scored / match1.5
Al TaawonNeom SC
1.5Goals conceded / match1.63
Al TaawonNeom SC
48%Average possession53%
Al TaawonNeom SC
5.25Shots on target / match4.88
Al TaawonNeom SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.88Shots per match12.38
Al TaawonNeom SC
5.25Shots on target4.88
Al TaawonNeom SC
24.2%Shot conversion12.1%
Al TaawonNeom SC
48%Possession53%
Al TaawonNeom SC
1.32xG for1.33
Al TaawonNeom SC
1.5xG against1.25
Al TaawonNeom SC

Shooting quality

Al Taawon: Efficient finishingNeom SC: Balanced
Al TaawonNeom SC
Accuracy (shots on target)44%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.550.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Taawon is 114% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Al Taawon · 1.4 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Taawon
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
88% W0% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-0-1
2.63 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
LWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Neom SC
WLDWL
Season result split
50% W13% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-3
1.63 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 away
3-0-1
LWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Taawon is 92% better for: goals scored per match.

2.88 goals / match - Al Taawon · 1.5 goals / match - Neom SC

Al Taawon is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Al Taawon · 1.63 goals / match - Neom SC

Al Taawon scoring profile: very strong

Al Taawon scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).

23Goals scored (season)12
Al TaawonNeom SC
12Goals conceded (season)13
Al TaawonNeom SC
4.38Average goals in match3.13
Al TaawonNeom SC
16Goals scored (last 5)9
Al TaawonNeom SC
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
Al TaawonNeom SC

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal88%
Al TaawonNeom SC
75%2 goals38%
Al TaawonNeom SC
50%3 goals25%
Al TaawonNeom SC
38%4 goals0%
Al TaawonNeom SC

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal88%
Al TaawonNeom SC
38%2 goals50%
Al TaawonNeom SC
13%3 goals25%
Al TaawonNeom SC
13%4 goals0%
Al TaawonNeom SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time38%
Al TaawonNeom SC
13%BTTS in both halves25%
Al TaawonNeom SC
50%Scored in both halves38%
Al TaawonNeom SC

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Al TaawonNeom SC
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al TaawonNeom SC
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Al TaawonNeom SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Al TaawonNeom SC
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Al TaawonNeom SC
38%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Al TaawonNeom SC

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Al TaawonNeom SC
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Al TaawonNeom SC
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Al TaawonNeom SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Taawon is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.13 pts / match - Al Taawon · 1.75 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Taawon - half-time state
63% leading25% draw13% trailing
Neom SC - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.13Points per match (1st half)1.75
Al TaawonNeom SC
1.25Goals scored (1st half)0.88
Al TaawonNeom SC
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Al TaawonNeom SC
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.63
Al TaawonNeom SC
63%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Al TaawonNeom SC
38%No goal before half-time38%
Al TaawonNeom SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)0.88
Al TaawonNeom SC
1.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Al TaawonNeom SC
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Al TaawonNeom SC
2.75Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Al TaawonNeom SC
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Al TaawonNeom SC
25%No goal after half-time38%
Al TaawonNeom SC

Al Taawon - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 88%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Neom SC - second-half results

0% W88% R13% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Taawon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.41.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
6
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al TaawonLigaNeom SC
Average goals in match 4.383.13 3.13
Both teams scored 63%66% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%58% 63%
Clean sheets 25%20% 13%
Goal before half-time 75%75% 88%
Goal after half-time 100%77% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.52
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Neom SCYellow cardAbdoulaye Doucouré
  2. Al TaawonYellow cardAchraf El Mahdioui
  3. Al TaawonYellow cardWaleed Abdul Wahab Al-Ahmad
  4. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Alexandre LacazetteOff: Ahmed Abdoh Jaber
  5. Al TaawonSubstitutionOn: Victor Hugo Ramos de SouzaOff: Angelo Fulgini
  6. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Awn Mutlaq Al SlaluliOff: Khalifah Aldawsari
  7. Neom SCYellow cardFaris Abdi
  8. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Hassan Al-AliOff: Aloyayari Abdulmalik
  9. Al TaawonYellow cardAndrei Girotto
  10. Neom SCYellow cardAbdulaziz Noor

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Khald AlahmariMatches officiated: 8
3.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins38%Draws25%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Al Taawon vs Neom SC?

The Professional League match finished Al Taawon 1:1 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Taawon vs Neom SC?

Al Taawon score 2.88 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.50. The Professional League average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Al Taawon's matches and 75% of Neom SC's.

What form are Al Taawon and Neom SC in?

Over the last 5 games Al Taawon have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Neom SC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Taawon vs Neom SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.