Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia: match statistics
Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Tadhamon played Al Qadsia in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match was played on 19 May 2026. Venue: Al-Farwaniya Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Al Tadhamon: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Al Qadsia: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Tadhamon scores 0.80 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Al Qadsia scores 1.87 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Tadhamon 47%, Al Qadsia 53%. Over 2.5: Al Tadhamon 40%, Al Qadsia 53%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Al Qadsia has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.08. Al Tadhamon: 7.4 shots per match, Al Qadsia: 11.9.
Match halves
Al Tadhamon: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.53. Al Qadsia: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Al Tadhamon: 61-75 (4 goals). Al Qadsia: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kuwait Premier League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Qadsia are favorites in this fixture due to a clear advantage in chance creation and quality of chances: the visitors average 13.14 shots per match with xG 1.57 away, versus 7.71 shots and xG 1.16 for the home side at home. The defensive gap is even more telling — Qadsia concede 1.00 goal on average away and keep a clean sheet in 57% of away matches, while Al Tadhamon concede 1.57 goals per home match and maintain a clean sheet in only 14% of games. Over the season the visitors have scored 28 goals and recorded 7 wins, compared to the hosts’ 11 goals and 3 wins, demonstrating greater efficiency and consistency from Qadsia despite similar recent form in the last 5 matches (both teams scored 8 and conceded 7). The hosts have a slightly better points return in the last 5 matches — 1.8 points per match versus 1.6 for the visitors — but this does not offset the visitors’ superiority in possession (59% vs 42%), shot volume and xG. Given these metrics, I assess an away victory as the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes at 70% vs 30% because offensive indicators and recent form favor both teams scoring. Al Tadhamon posts a season BTTS rate of 63% vs Al Qadsia’s 43%, and over the last 5 matches these are 60% and 80% respectively, indicating a strong recent trend for the visitors. Both teams’ xG are similar: 1.48 (home) vs 1.57 (away), and in the last 5 games both sides have averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, increasing the likelihood of exchanged goals. Although Al Qadsia keep a clean sheet in 57% of matches, Al Tadhamon scores on average 2.5 goals per game with a 23% conversion from 5.75 shots on target (versus the opponent’s 1.14 goals and 9% conversion), so the home side can force Al Qadsia to concede. In summary: 63%/43% seasonally, 60%/80% in the last 5 and xG 1.48/1.57 provide a stronger signal for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis shows both teams create a significant number of chances: xG Al Tadhamon is 1.48, xG Al Qadsia 1.57; conceded xG is 1.24 for the home side and 1.04 for the visitors, which averaged yields expected goals of 1.27 for Al Tadhamon and 1.40 for Al Qadsia (total 2.67). These values align with seasonal trends: Al Tadhamon has Over 1.5 in 88% and Over 2.5 in 75% of home matches, while Al Qadsia has Over 1.5 in 71% of fixtures; additionally, in the last 5 matches BTTS is 60% for the home team and 80% for the visitors. Moreover, the hosts have a very high shot conversion rate of 23% with 5.75 shots on target per game versus 9% and 4.43 for the away side, which increases the likelihood of actual goals exceeding xG. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 with high probability, while Over 2.5 remains moderately likely given the expected total of ~2.67 goals and the home side’s seasonal tendency toward high-scoring games.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Tadhamon is clearly stronger this season: the hosts score an average of 2.5 goals per game versus 1.14 for Al Qadsia and collect 2.0 points per match compared to 1.29 for their opponents. Despite similar xG (1.48 for the hosts vs 1.57 for the visitors), the hosts convert chances to goals more efficiently (23% conversion vs 9%) and register more on-target shots 5.75 vs 4.43. At half-time I expect a draw: Al Tadhamon have been level at the break in 4 matches (50%) and average 1.0 goals scored by half-time with 0.25 conceded, while the visitors score 0.71 and concede 0.57 by half-time. In the second half the hosts dominate — they average 1.5 goals after the break, have 100% of home matches with at least one goal after half-time and have won the second half in 80% of their last 5 games, therefore the half-time draw/full-time Al Tadhamon win scenario (X/1) is the most likely (36%), with the half-time/full-time 1/1 outcome the second-strongest signal (22%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Tadhamon | Al Qadsia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Qadsia is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Al Tadhamon · 2 pts / match - Al Qadsia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Qadsia is 134% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Al Tadhamon · 1.87 goals / match - Al Qadsia
Al Qadsia is 94% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.8 goals / match - Al Tadhamon · 0.93 goals / match - Al Qadsia
Al Tadhamon scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Al Qadsia keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
Al Qadsia scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Al Tadhamon keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Tadhamon
Over / Under - Al Qadsia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Qadsia is 202% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.53 pts / match - Al Tadhamon · 1.6 pts / match - Al Qadsia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Tadhamon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Qadsia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Tadhamon
Al Qadsia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Tadhamon | Liga | Al Qadsia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.60 | 2.63 | ▲ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Tadhamon 0 - 0 - 1 Al Qadsia. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia?
The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Tadhamon 0:1 Al Qadsia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia?
Al Tadhamon score 0.80 goals per game on average and Al Qadsia 1.87. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Al Tadhamon's matches and 53% of Al Qadsia's.
What form are Al Tadhamon and Al Qadsia in?
Over the last 5 games Al Tadhamon have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Qadsia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia?
The statistical background for Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


