Al Ula vs Al Orubah: match statistics
Al Ula vs Al Orubah: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Ula played Al Orubah in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 18 May 2026. Venue: Prince Mohammed bin Abdul Aziz Stadium. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Al Ula: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Al Orubah: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Ula scores 2.21 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Al Orubah scores 1.65 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Ula 62%, Al Orubah 56%. Over 2.5: Al Ula 68%, Al Orubah 65%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ula has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.33. Al Ula: 13.4 shots per match, Al Orubah: 10.9.
Match halves
Al Ula: half-time lead 65%, second-half goals 0.94. Al Orubah: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.03.
Goals by minute
Al Ula: 31-45+ (25 goals). Al Orubah: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Ula is the favorite in this match: they sit 2nd in the table with a season record of 22 wins, 8 draws and 4 losses and a goal tally of 75–30, while Al Orubah are 5th with 20–5–9 and goals 56–38. At home Al Ula averages 2.35 goals scored and 0.88 conceded per game, records 14.41 shots (5.94 on target) and xG 1.65; Al Orubah away average 2.00 goals scored, 1.18 conceded, 10.76 shots (4.06 on target) and xG 1.34. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 11 goals and achieved 4 wins, but Al Ula shows higher consistency: 2.6 points per game in the last 5 versus 2.4 for the opponent and a lower share of goalless matches (6% vs 12%). The home side’s main advantage is more chances and better defense: home goal difference +25 versus the visitors’ +14 on the road and lower full-season goals conceded (30 vs 38). Considering the higher xG (1.65 vs 1.34), greater shot volume (14.41 vs 10.76) and lower risk of failing to score, I tip a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "both teams to score" scenario looks more likely: the away side has a seasonal BTTS of 71%, the league average is 62%, and the home team—despite a seasonal 41%—has a 60% BTTS rate in the last 5 matches, producing a mixed but leaning-towards-Yes signal. Both teams have been prolific recently — averaging 2.2 goals each over the last five matches (11 goals in the last 5 for each), and xG is comparable: 1.32 for the home team vs 1.34 for the away team, so both sides have similar scoring potential. Additionally, the home team keep a clean sheet in only 29% of matches (conceding in 71%), while the away team keep a clean sheet in only 24% (conceding in 76%), which increases the likelihood of goal exchange. Counterarguments include the home team’s seasonal BTTS of 41% and the fact that the home side average 1.29 goals per game versus 2.0 for the away side, but the away team’s high shot conversion 19% vs 12% for the hosts and the high share of matches over 2.5 goals (53% and 76%) incline the recommendation toward Yes. Based on this, I recommend BTTS - Yes with probability 72% and No 28%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis: Al Ula has xg_for 1.32 and the opponent's xg_against 1.26, yielding 1.29 xG for the home side; Al Orubah has xg_for 1.34 and the opponent's xg_against 1.13, yielding 1.24 xG for the away side, totaling 2.53 expected goals. Al Orubah averages 2.0 goals away and has 76% of matches Over 2.5 goals, while Al Ula averages 1.29 goals at home and has 53% of matches Over 2.5 goals, so the away side clearly holds the offensive advantage. In the last 5 fixtures both teams scored 11 goals each (2.2 per match on average) and Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of those matches for both teams, which reinforces the expectation of at least 2 goals. Additionally, Al Orubah’s shot conversion is 19% versus 12% for the hosts, and the both-teams-to-score rate is 71% for Al Orubah vs 41% for Al Ula, suggesting an open game with goals from both sides. For these reasons I recommend Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side Over) as the strongest signal with an estimated probability of around 78%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Orubah appears to be the favorite: the visitors average 2.00 goals per match versus 1.29 for the hosts and win 71% of their games, while Al Ula has a 47% win rate. At half-time the statistics suggest a draw is a common scenario – the hosts led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), however season-long percentages for leads at the break are 41% for each team and the percentages for half-time draws are 41%/35% (approximately 38% on average), with average goals by half-time 0.82 (hosts) vs. 1.18 (visitors). The second half clearly favors Al Orubah: second-half goals average 2.0 for the visitors versus 1.53 for the hosts, the goal difference in second halves is +10 for the visitors, and 94% of their matches see over 0.5 goals after the break. xG is similar (1.34 vs 1.32), but the visitors’ shot conversion is higher (19% vs 12%), so the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a visitors’ win at full-time (X/2), which I assess as the strongest signal (~25%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ula | Al Orubah | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Ula is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Al Ula · 2.4 pts / match - Al Orubah
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ula is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
2.21 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.65 goals / match - Al Orubah
Al Ula is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.88 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.12 goals / match - Al Orubah
Al Ula scores in 91% of matches (31 of 34 matches), while Al Orubah keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 matches).
Al Orubah scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Ula
Over / Under - Al Orubah
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ula is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.26 pts / match - Al Ula · 1.62 pts / match - Al Orubah
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ula - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 65% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Orubah - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (25 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Ula
Al Orubah
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Ula | Liga | Al Orubah | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.09 | 2.96 | ▼ 2.76 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 62% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 22% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 85% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Al Ula 2 - 0 - 0 Al Orubah. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ula vs Al Orubah?
The First Division match finished Al Ula 2:2 Al Orubah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Ula and Al Orubah?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Ula won 2, Al Orubah won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ula vs Al Orubah?
Al Ula score 2.21 goals per game on average and Al Orubah 1.65. The First Division average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Al Ula's matches and 56% of Al Orubah's.
What form are Al Ula and Al Orubah in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ula have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Al Orubah 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ula vs Al Orubah?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


