Saudi Arabia - First DivisionData current as of 12 September 2026

Al Ula vs Al Wahda: match statistics

Al Ula crest
Al Ula
3 : 0half-time 3:0
Al Wahda crest
Al Wahda
165%(0.00)
X22%(0.00)
213%(0.00)

Al Ula presents impressive home form with 50% wins and just 0% losses at home, scoring an average of 2.25 goals per match with a +11 goal difference. The hosts dominate home games in terms of possession (55%) and shot efficiency (6.5 on target per match), confirming their offensive advantage with an xG of 1.83. Al Wahda has poor results on the road with 50% losses and only 38% wins, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per away match with a negative xG difference (1.18 to 1.54). The visitors' form in their last five away matches is concerning (ldlwlwwl), and their offensive statistics on the road (3.88 shots on target, 47% possession) are significantly weaker than the hosts' defensive capabilities. Considering all these factors, Al Ula holds a clear advantage and should secure three points in this meeting.

Al Ula vs Al Wahda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Ula played Al Wahda in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 22 January 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Al Ula: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Al Wahda: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Ula scores 2.06 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Al Wahda scores 1.41 and concedes 1.76. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Ula 59%, Al Wahda 76%. Over 2.5: Al Ula 53%, Al Wahda 71%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Al Ula has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.24. Al Ula: 12.9 shots per match, Al Wahda: 9.9.

Match halves

Al Ula: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 0.65. Al Wahda: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Al Ula: 31-45+ (13 goals). Al Wahda: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Ula presents impressive home form with 50% wins and just 0% losses at home, scoring an average of 2.25 goals per match with a +11 goal difference. The hosts dominate home games in terms of possession (55%) and shot efficiency (6.5 on target per match), confirming their offensive advantage with an xG of 1.83. Al Wahda has poor results on the road with 50% losses and only 38% wins, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per away match with a negative xG difference (1.18 to 1.54). The visitors' form in their last five away matches is concerning (ldlwlwwl), and their offensive statistics on the road (3.88 shots on target, 47% possession) are significantly weaker than the hosts' defensive capabilities. Considering all these factors, Al Ula holds a clear advantage and should secure three points in this meeting.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Al UlaAl Wahda
15Shots5
Al UlaAl Wahda
10Shots on target0
Al UlaAl Wahda
1.77xG0.38
Al UlaAl Wahda
4Corners3
Al UlaAl Wahda
17Dangerous attacks8
Al UlaAl Wahda
12Fouls10
Al UlaAl Wahda
0Cards1
Al UlaAl Wahda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.06Goals scored / match1.41
Al UlaAl Wahda
0.94Goals conceded / match1.76
Al UlaAl Wahda
52%Average possession49%
Al UlaAl Wahda
5.24Shots on target / match3.94
Al UlaAl Wahda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.94Shots per match9.88
Al UlaAl Wahda
5.24Shots on target3.94
Al UlaAl Wahda
15.9%Shot conversion14.3%
Al UlaAl Wahda
52%Possession49%
Al UlaAl Wahda
1.5xG for1.24
Al UlaAl Wahda
1.22xG against1.54
Al UlaAl Wahda

Shooting quality

Al Ula: Efficient finishingAl Wahda: Efficient finishing
Al UlaAl Wahda
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Wahda is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Al Ula · 1.4 pts / match - Al Wahda

Al Ula
DDLWD
Season result split
47% W41% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-2
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Al Wahda
WWLDL
Season result split
29% W24% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-8
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ula is 46% better for: goals scored per match.

2.06 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.41 goals / match - Al Wahda

Al Ula is 87% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.76 goals / match - Al Wahda

Al Ula scoring profile: very strong

Al Ula scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Al Wahda keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

Al Wahda scoring profile: very strong

Al Wahda scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

35Goals scored (season)24
Al UlaAl Wahda
16Goals conceded (season)30
Al UlaAl Wahda
3Average goals in match3.18
Al UlaAl Wahda
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Al UlaAl Wahda
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Al UlaAl Wahda

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal82%
Al UlaAl Wahda
53%2 goals41%
Al UlaAl Wahda
29%3 goals12%
Al UlaAl Wahda
18%4 goals6%
Al UlaAl Wahda

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal94%
Al UlaAl Wahda
24%2 goals59%
Al UlaAl Wahda
6%3 goals12%
Al UlaAl Wahda
0%4 goals6%
Al UlaAl Wahda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time29%
Al UlaAl Wahda
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Al UlaAl Wahda
41%Scored in both halves29%
Al UlaAl Wahda

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Al UlaAl Wahda
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Al UlaAl Wahda
60%BTTS - last 560%
Al UlaAl Wahda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Al UlaAl Wahda
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Al UlaAl Wahda
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Al UlaAl Wahda

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Al UlaAl Wahda
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Al UlaAl Wahda
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Al UlaAl Wahda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ula is 94% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.41 pts / match - Al Ula · 1.24 pts / match - Al Wahda

Al Ula - half-time state
71% leading29% draw0% trailing
Al Wahda - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.41Points per match (1st half)1.24
Al UlaAl Wahda
1.41Goals scored (1st half)0.59
Al UlaAl Wahda
0.24Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Al UlaAl Wahda
1.65Average goals (1st half)1.29
Al UlaAl Wahda
76%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Al UlaAl Wahda
24%No goal before half-time47%
Al UlaAl Wahda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Al UlaAl Wahda
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Al UlaAl Wahda
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1.06
Al UlaAl Wahda
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Al UlaAl Wahda
47%Clean sheet after half-time24%
Al UlaAl Wahda
47%No goal after half-time41%
Al UlaAl Wahda

Al Ula - second-half results

24% W47% D29% L
41
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 47%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Wahda - second-half results

29% W29% D41% L
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Ula - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Al Wahda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Ula
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
6
2
16-30
13
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Al Wahda
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
5
31-45
4
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Ula

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Al Wahda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

Al UlaLigaAl Wahda
Average goals in match 3.002.73 3.18
Both teams scored 59%59% 76%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%53% 71%
Clean sheets 35%25% 6%
Goal before half-time 76%73% 76%
Goal after half-time 76%80% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al WahdaYellow cardAbdulaziz Making
  2. Al UlaSubstitutionOn: Sumayhan AlnabitOff: Ayman Al Khulaif

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Ula 1 - 0 - 0 Al Wahda. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Al Wahda
0 : 5
Al Ula

FAQ

What was the result of Al Ula vs Al Wahda?

The First Division match finished Al Ula 3:0 Al Wahda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Ula vs Al Wahda?

Al Ula score 2.06 goals per game on average and Al Wahda 1.41. The First Division average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Al Ula's matches and 76% of Al Wahda's.

What form are Al Ula and Al Wahda in?

Over the last 5 games Al Ula have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Al Wahda 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ula vs Al Wahda?

The statistical background for Al Ula vs Al Wahda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.