Al Wasl vs Al Ittihad Kalba: match statistics
Al Wasl vs Al Ittihad Kalba: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Wasl played Al Ittihad Kalba in Arabian Gulf League (United Arab Emirates). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Al Wasl: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Al Ittihad Kalba: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Wasl scores 1.48 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Al Ittihad Kalba scores 1.12 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Wasl 60%, Al Ittihad Kalba 68%. Over 2.5: Al Wasl 48%, Al Ittihad Kalba 64%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Al Wasl has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.21. Al Wasl: 15.2 shots per match, Al Ittihad Kalba: 11.4.
Match halves
Al Wasl: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.88. Al Ittihad Kalba: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Al Wasl: 46-60 (9 goals). Al Ittihad Kalba: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Arabian Gulf League: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Wasl is the clear favorite: at home they win 67% of matches, have a +11 home goal differential, score 1.5 goals and concede only 0.58 per game with home xG 1.54 vs xG against 1.01. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and won 4 of 5, averaging 2.4 points per match. Al Ittihad Kalba has not won any of their last five (0-3-2), scored 6 goals (1.2 per game) and averages only 0.6 points per match in that span; away they concede 2.0 goals on average and have a -8 goal differential. The quality gap in chance creation is significant: Al Wasl averages 14.5 shots with 4.42 on target and 61% possession at home, while Kalba away registers 12.08 shots with 3.17 on target and 45% possession; the hosts also have 50% clean sheets vs 17% for the visitors. Considering superior attacking form (12 vs 6 goals in the last 5), higher xG (1.54 vs 1.29) and a much weaker away defense (2.0 vs 0.58 goals conceded), I project a home win 72%, draw 18% and away win 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams give a strong BTTS signal: seasonal BTTS rates are 69% (Al Wasl) and 67% (Al Ittihad Kalba), and in the last 5 matches both teams have 80% BTTS. Looking at goals, Al Wasl averages 0.92 scored and 1.46 conceded seasonally, but in the last 5 matches scores 2.4 and concedes 2.0, while Kalba seasonally scores 1.33 and concedes 2.0 (last 5: 1.2 scored, 1.6 conceded). xG also supports both teams scoring: attacking xG is 1.14 for Al Wasl and 1.29 for Kalba, and xG against is 1.66 vs 1.59, so both sides generate over 1.1 xG while being exposed to around 1.6 opponent xG. Additionally, clean sheets are rare (23% and 17%), and matches over 2.5 goals occur in 54% and 75% of cases, therefore I tip BTTS - Yes with 82% probability versus 18% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Comparison of xG and each team’s defensive metrics yields approximately 1.37 xG for Al Wasl (attacking xG 1.14 vs xG conceded 1.59) and 1.48 xG for Al Ittihad Kalba (1.29 vs 1.66), totaling 2.85 expected goals. Seasonal averages show Al Wasl scores 0.92 goals at home, but in the last 5 matches they averaged 2.4 goals (12 in 5), while Al Ittihad has a seasonal average of 1.33 and 1.2 in the last 5. Both teams register high BTTS rates: 69% (home) and 67% (away), and season-long Over 2.5 rates are 54% for Al Wasl and 75% for Al Ittihad; in last5 form Over 2.5 occurred for the home side in 100% and for the visitors in 80%. In light of these numbers the strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 (I recommend Over 1.5 as the best line at approx. 90% probability), Over 2.5 holds moderate value (~68%), while Over 3.5 is less likely (~35%) given the expected 2.85 goals and season-long Over 3.5 rates of 38%/42%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The first half is most likely to finish level: the home side have been level at the break in 77% of matches and kept a clean sheet in the first 45 minutes in 69% of fixtures, with an average of 0.31 goals scored by half-time. Visitors concede an average of 0.92 goals by the break, and both teams’ first-half situations rarely result in both teams scoring (BTTS HT is 15% for the home side and 17% for the visitors), supporting a low-scoring draw at Half-Time. However, the advantage shifts to the away team in the second half: Al Ittihad Kalba average 1.00 goal after the break and win second halves in 33% of cases, whereas Al Wasl win second halves in only 8% and score an average of 0.62 goals after the interval. Additionally, the visitors have higher xG (1.29 vs 1.14) and a season win percentage of 33% versus the home side’s 8%, reinforcing the turnaround scenario after half-time. On this basis the most probable and strongest signal is Half-Time draw with an away win Full-Time (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Wasl | Al Ittihad Kalba | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Wasl is 300% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Al Wasl · 0.6 pts / match - Al Ittihad Kalba
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Wasl is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.48 goals / match - Al Wasl · 1.12 goals / match - Al Ittihad Kalba
Al Wasl is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.12 goals / match - Al Wasl · 1.72 goals / match - Al Ittihad Kalba
Al Wasl scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Al Ittihad Kalba keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
Al Ittihad Kalba scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Al Wasl keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Wasl
Over / Under - Al Ittihad Kalba
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Wasl is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Al Wasl · 0.88 pts / match - Al Ittihad Kalba
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Wasl - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Ittihad Kalba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Wasl
Al Ittihad Kalba
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Arabian Gulf League).
Teams vs league
| Al Wasl | Liga | Al Ittihad Kalba | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.60 | 2.81 | • 2.84 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 55% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 25% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 70% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 81% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Al Wasl 0 - 3 - 0 Al Ittihad Kalba. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Wasl vs Al Ittihad Kalba?
The Arabian Gulf League match finished Al Wasl 2:1 Al Ittihad Kalba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Wasl and Al Ittihad Kalba?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Al Wasl won 0, Al Ittihad Kalba won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Wasl vs Al Ittihad Kalba?
Al Wasl score 1.48 goals per game on average and Al Ittihad Kalba 1.12. The Arabian Gulf League average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Al Wasl's matches and 68% of Al Ittihad Kalba's.
What form are Al Wasl and Al Ittihad Kalba in?
Over the last 5 games Al Wasl have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Al Ittihad Kalba 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Wasl vs Al Ittihad Kalba?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Wasl vs Al Ittihad Kalba: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


