Singapore - S.LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar: match statistics

170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Albirex Niigata S are clearly superior to Tanjong Pagar in terms of form and efficiency. The hosts have averaged 2 points per match in their last five games with three wins, while the visitors have lost all five of their recent fixtures without picking up a single point. At home, Albirex average 2 goals per match with an xG of 2.21, proving their offensive potency, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede an average of 2 goals on the road with a very poor xG of 1.14. The visitors have a 100% loss record in away matches and are unable to keep a clean sheet. Shot statistics also favor the hosts—19 attempts per match compared to just 10 for the visitors. All indicators unanimously point to a convincing win for Albirex Niigata S.

Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Albirex Niigata S played Tanjong Pagar in S.League (Singapore). The match was played on 17 January 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Albirex Niigata S: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match. Tanjong Pagar: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Albirex Niigata S scores 2.00 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Tanjong Pagar scores 1.40 and concedes 3.00. League average: 3.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Albirex Niigata S 25%, Tanjong Pagar 60%. Over 2.5: Albirex Niigata S 75%, Tanjong Pagar 100%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 80%.

xG, shots and style

Albirex Niigata S has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.31. Albirex Niigata S: 13.3 shots per match, Tanjong Pagar: 11.0.

Match halves

Albirex Niigata S: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 0.75. Tanjong Pagar: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Albirex Niigata S: 31-45+ (4 goals). Tanjong Pagar: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

S.League: 3.85 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 80%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Albirex Niigata S are clearly superior to Tanjong Pagar in terms of form and efficiency. The hosts have averaged 2 points per match in their last five games with three wins, while the visitors have lost all five of their recent fixtures without picking up a single point. At home, Albirex average 2 goals per match with an xG of 2.21, proving their offensive potency, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede an average of 2 goals on the road with a very poor xG of 1.14. The visitors have a 100% loss record in away matches and are unable to keep a clean sheet. Shot statistics also favor the hosts—19 attempts per match compared to just 10 for the visitors. All indicators unanimously point to a convincing win for Albirex Niigata S.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
16Shots6
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
8Shots on target3
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
2.13xG1.02
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
4Corners4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
78Dangerous attacks58
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
18Fouls7
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1Cards2
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
2Goals scored / match1.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.25Goals conceded / match3
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
46%Average possession45%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
4.5Shots on target / match3.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.25Shots per match11
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
4.5Shots on target3.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
15.1%Shot conversion12.7%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
46%Possession45%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.62xG for1.31
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.58xG against2.54
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Shooting quality

Albirex Niigata S: Counter-attackingTanjong Pagar: Counter-attacking
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Albirex Niigata S is 192% better for: last-5 form.

1.75 pts / match - Albirex Niigata S · 0.6 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S
DWWL
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 75%
Tanjong Pagar
LLWLL
Season result split
20% W0% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 2.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Albirex Niigata S is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Albirex Niigata S · 1.4 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S is 140% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Albirex Niigata S · 3 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S scoring profile: very strong

Albirex Niigata S scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Tanjong Pagar scoring profile: mixed

Tanjong Pagar scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Albirex Niigata S keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

8Goals scored (season)7
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
5Goals conceded (season)15
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
3.25Average goals in match4.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
5Goals conceded (last 5)15
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
75%2 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%3 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%4 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%2 goals80%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%3 goals40%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0%4 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Scored in both halves20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS40%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%BTTS - last 560%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Albirex Niigata S is 181% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.25 pts / match - Albirex Niigata S · 0.8 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S - half-time state
75% leading0% draw25% trailing
Tanjong Pagar - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.25Points per match (1st half)0.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.25Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1.6
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.75Average goals (1st half)2
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%No goal before half-time60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)0.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Clean sheet after half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%No goal after half-time60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanjong Pagar - second-half results

20% W20% R60% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Albirex Niigata S - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.251.50
Goals scored / match1.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.50.8
Average goals in match1.81.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 75% leading - 0% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 5
Tanjong Pagar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.61.4
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Albirex Niigata S
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
4
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tanjong Pagar
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
5
31-45
0
1
46-60
4
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Albirex Niigata S

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Tanjong Pagar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).

Teams vs league

Albirex Niigata SLigaTanjong Pagar
Average goals in match 3.253.85 4.40
Both teams scored 25%55% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%80% 100%
Clean sheets 50%25% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%85% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%90% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.85
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
2.15
Away goals / match
+-21%
Home attack advantage
+-26%
Home defence advantage
+-15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
70%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tanjong PagarYellow cardBruno de Araujo Dybal
  2. Albirex Niigata SGoalJo Eun-soo
  3. Tanjong PagarYellow cardChan-Woo Lee
  4. Albirex Niigata SGoalTakumi Yokohata
  5. Tanjong PagarSubstitutionOn: Faizal RoslanOff: Chan-Woo Lee
  6. Tanjong PagarSubstitutionOn: Naqiuddin EunosOff: Muhammad Syahrul Bin Sazali
  7. Albirex Niigata SYellow cardKim Tae-uk
  8. Albirex Niigata SSubstitutionOn: Shakthi VinayagavijayanOff: Muhammad Haziq bin Kamarudin
  9. Tanjong PagarGoalMuhamad Anaqi bin Ismit
  10. Albirex Niigata SGoalSyed Firdaus Hassan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar?

The S.League match finished Albirex Niigata S 3:2 Tanjong Pagar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar?

Albirex Niigata S score 2.00 goals per game on average and Tanjong Pagar 1.40. The S.League average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Albirex Niigata S's matches and 60% of Tanjong Pagar's.

What form are Albirex Niigata S and Tanjong Pagar in?

Over the last 5 games Albirex Niigata S have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Tanjong Pagar 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.