Albirex Niigata S vs Young Lions: match statistics
Albirex Niigata S vs Young Lions: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Albirex Niigata S played Young Lions in S.League (Singapore). The match was played on 4 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Albirex Niigata S: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Young Lions: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Albirex Niigata S scores 2.28 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Young Lions scores 0.56 and concedes 3.00. League average: 3.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Albirex Niigata S 44%, Young Lions 50%. Over 2.5: Albirex Niigata S 72%, Young Lions 44%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 74%.
xG, shots and style
Albirex Niigata S has higher xG: 1.91 vs 1.05. Albirex Niigata S: 15.9 shots per match, Young Lions: 8.5.
Match halves
Albirex Niigata S: half-time lead 61%, second-half goals 1.06. Young Lions: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.06.
Goals by minute
Albirex Niigata S: 31-45+ (13 goals). Young Lions: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
S.League: 3.58 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 74%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Albirex Niigata S holds a clear statistical advantage: at home they average 2.63 goals per game and 6.88 shots on target, whereas Young Lions average 0.78 goals away and only 3.22 shots on target. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 14 goals and won 4 of 5 games, equating to 2.4 points per game; the visitors scored 2 goals and average 0.6 points per game in that period. Defensively the gap is stark: Young Lions concede 3.67 goals away on average and have 54 goals conceded this season, while Albirex concede 1.38 at home and 19 overall; in the last 5 matches the hosts conceded 5 goals (1.0 per game) versus 14 (2.8 per game) for Young Lions. Chance quality also favors Albirex — average xG for the hosts at home is 1.83 versus 1.11 xG for Young Lions away, and shot conversion rates are 18% vs 9%, with possession 48% vs 43%. Given that the hosts have 0% scoreless home games (always score at home), a positive home goal difference of +10 and Young Lions’ negative away goal difference of -26, the most likely scenario is an Albirex victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Young Lions in the last 5 matches scored an average of 0.4 goals (2 goals total) and conceded an average of 2.8 goals (14 conceded), highlighting serious attacking issues. Albirex in their last 5 matches scored an average of 2.8 goals (14) and conceded 1.0 goal (5 conceded), with BTTS occurring in 60% of their last 5 games. xG confirms the home advantage: last 5 xG for Albirex is 1.86 versus 1.01 for Young Lions, while Young Lions’ defense allows 2.12 xG compared to 0.81 allowed by Albirex. Season-long indicators are mixed (BTTS this season: Albirex 33% vs Young Lions 67%, league average BTTS 51%), but Young Lions score only 0.78 goals per game on the season and have been very inefficient recently, which weakens the BTTS scenario. Based on this I assign 35% to BTTS - Yes and 65% to No Goal — the strongest signal is Young Lions’ poor goal-scoring ability, so the pick: 'No Goal'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Albirex has averaged 2.8 goals in the last 5 matches (14 goals in 5 matches) with an average xG of 1.86, while Young Lions have scored 0.4 goals (2 goals in 5 matches) with an xG of 1.01. Young Lions conceded an average of 2.8 goals in those 5 matches (14 conceded), and Albirex conceded 1.0 goal (5 conceded), indicating a clear attacking advantage for the home side. Aggregating xG: 1.86 (Albirex xG) + 2.12 (xG conceded by Young Lions) leads to an expected ~1.99 goals for the hosts, and 1.01 (Young Lions xG) + 0.81 (xG conceded by Albirex) gives ~0.91 goals for the visitors, total ~2.90. The league averages 3.63 goals per match, Albirex has 100% of season matches over 1.5 goals, Young Lions 89%, and Albirex had 100% over 2.5 in the last 5 matches, which increases the probability of more than 2.5 goals. Based on this, the best signal is Over 2.5 (estimated probability ~68%); Over 1.5 is nearly certain (~93%), while Over 3.5 appears less likely (~29%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (home leading at Half-Time/Full-Time) because Albirex have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and led at the break in 2 of those 5 (40%), scoring an average of 1.4 goals by half-time and conceding 0.8. Young Lions have only 1 win in their last 5 (20%), score an average of 0.4 goals and concede 2.8 in those five matches, and concede 3.67 goals per game on the season. Albirex average 2.8 goals per match over the last 5 and record 2.4 points per game, whereas Young Lions have 0.4 goals and 0.6 points per game in their last 5, which gives a clear advantage to the home side. Seasonal xG shows slightly higher expected goals for the visitors (xG 1.11 vs 0.99 for Albirex), but Young Lions have the weaker defence (xG against 2.59 versus 1.95 for the hosts), so the higher probability is that the hosts will maintain their lead to the end. Therefore I assign 40% to 1/1 as the strongest signal, 20% to Half-Time draw / home win (X/1), and smaller stakes to the remaining variants.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Albirex Niigata S | Young Lions | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Albirex Niigata S is 300% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Albirex Niigata S · 0.6 pts / match - Young Lions
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Albirex Niigata S is 307% better for: goals scored per match.
2.28 goals / match - Albirex Niigata S · 0.56 goals / match - Young Lions
Albirex Niigata S is 183% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - Albirex Niigata S · 3 goals / match - Young Lions
Albirex Niigata S scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Young Lions keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).
Young Lions scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Albirex Niigata S keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Albirex Niigata S
Over / Under - Young Lions
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Albirex Niigata S is 207% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.06 pts / match - Albirex Niigata S · 0.67 pts / match - Young Lions
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Albirex Niigata S - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 61% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Young Lions - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -10 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Albirex Niigata S
Young Lions
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Albirex Niigata S | Liga | Young Lions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.33 | 3.58 | • 3.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 72% | 74% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 26% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 85% | ▼ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 86% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Albirex Niigata S 1 - 0 - 0 Young Lions. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Albirex Niigata S vs Young Lions?
The S.League match finished Albirex Niigata S 1:0 Young Lions. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Albirex Niigata S vs Young Lions?
Albirex Niigata S score 2.28 goals per game on average and Young Lions 0.56. The S.League average is 3.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Albirex Niigata S's matches and 50% of Young Lions's.
What form are Albirex Niigata S and Young Lions in?
Over the last 5 games Albirex Niigata S have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Young Lions 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Albirex Niigata S vs Young Lions?
The statistical background for Albirex Niigata S vs Young Lions — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


