Italy - Serie C Group ACampo comunale MendrisioData current as of 22 October 2026

Alcione vs Treviso: match statistics

Alcione crest
Alcione
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Treviso crest
Treviso

Alcione vs Treviso: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Alcione played Treviso in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match was played on 7 September 2026. Venue: Campo comunale Mendrisio. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Alcione: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Treviso: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Alcione scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Treviso scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Alcione 50%, Treviso 50%. Over 2.5: Alcione 50%, Treviso 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Alcione has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.22. Alcione: 10.0 shots per match, Treviso: 11.0.

Match halves

Alcione: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Treviso: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Alcione: 16-30 (1 goals). Treviso: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.04 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Alcione have a clearly stronger home profile: they won their only home match so far, scoring an average of 3 goals and conceding 1. Treviso, meanwhile, lost their only away fixture, averaging just 1 goal scored and 2 conceded per game. The hosts are significantly more clinical, converting 25% of their shots compared with the opponents’ 8%, and they also hit the target more often: 7 times per match versus just 1 attempt from Treviso. Alcione’s possession advantage, 52% to 28%, should translate into longer spells of control. Although neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, Treviso’s run includes 3 defeats in their last 5 matches and 8 goals conceded, further strengthening the case for backing the home side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Alcione have averaged only 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches, with both teams scoring in just 20% of those games. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far and conceded an average of 0.0 goals at home, which significantly limits Treviso’s chances of scoring. Treviso do concede an average of 2.0 goals away from home, but they score only 1.0 goal themselves and manage just 1.0 shot on target per match. The visitors’ last five appearances have produced a BTTS rate of 40%, still below the league average of 45%. The xG figures for both teams over their last five matches are similar—1.35 for Alcione and 1.32 for Treviso—but the hosts’ low scoring efficiency and Alcione’s very solid defensive record provide stronger support for a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Alcione have averaged just 0.6 goals scored and 0.6 conceded over their last five matches, with only 20% of those games going Over 2.5 goals. Treviso are defensively less stable, conceding an average of 1.6 goals in their last five appearances, which raises the hosts’ projection to around 1.40 goals. At the same time, the visitors average 1.0 goal scored, while Alcione have kept a clean sheet in the current campaign and recorded a low recent goals-conceded rate. The combined xG figures from the teams’ recent matches stand at 1.35 and 1.32, but Alcione’s actual finishing remains significantly below the quality of the chances they create. With 2.30 goals expected and the league average at just 2.05, the safest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Alcione win, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 50% for Treviso. During this period, Alcione averaged 0.4 goals scored and 0.4 conceded before half-time, while Treviso scored just 0.25 goals and allowed opponents to average 0.75. After the break, the hosts have the more favourable profile: in the season data, they average 1.0 goals scored and have not conceded, whereas Treviso have failed to score and concede an average of 1.0 goal. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with their xG standing at 1.31 compared with Treviso’s 1.26, while the visitors’ defence allows an average of 1.70 xG. Caution is warranted due to both teams’ low scoring efficiency over their last five matches, with Alcione averaging 0.6 goals scored; however, Treviso’s weak defence, conceding 1.6 goals per match, further supports the HT/FT draw/Alcione win scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
AlcioneTreviso
13Shots14
AlcioneTreviso
2Shots on target4
AlcioneTreviso
1.35xG1.81
AlcioneTreviso
4Corners3
AlcioneTreviso
55Dangerous attacks91
AlcioneTreviso
10Fouls12
AlcioneTreviso
4Cards2
AlcioneTreviso

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1
AlcioneTreviso
0.5Goals conceded / match1
AlcioneTreviso
53%Average possession39%
AlcioneTreviso
4Shots on target / match2
AlcioneTreviso

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match11
AlcioneTreviso
4Shots on target2
AlcioneTreviso
15%Shot conversion9.1%
AlcioneTreviso
53%Possession39%
AlcioneTreviso
1.25xG for1.22
AlcioneTreviso
1.4xG against1.55
AlcioneTreviso

Shooting quality

Alcione: Efficient finishingTreviso: Balanced
AlcioneTreviso
Accuracy (shots on target)40%18%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Alcione is 33% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Alcione · 1.5 pts / match - Treviso

Alcione
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Treviso
LW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Alcione is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Alcione · 1 goals / match - Treviso

Alcione is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Alcione · 1 goals / match - Treviso

Alcione scoring profile: mixed

Alcione scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Treviso keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Treviso scoring profile: very strong

Treviso scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Alcione keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)2
AlcioneTreviso
1Goals conceded (season)2
AlcioneTreviso
2Average goals in match2
AlcioneTreviso
3Goals scored (last 5)2
AlcioneTreviso
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
AlcioneTreviso

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
AlcioneTreviso
50%2 goals0%
AlcioneTreviso
50%3 goals0%
AlcioneTreviso
0%4 goals0%
AlcioneTreviso

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
AlcioneTreviso
0%2 goals50%
AlcioneTreviso
0%3 goals0%
AlcioneTreviso
0%4 goals0%
AlcioneTreviso

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time50%
AlcioneTreviso
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AlcioneTreviso
50%Scored in both halves0%
AlcioneTreviso

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
AlcioneTreviso
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AlcioneTreviso
50%BTTS - last 550%
AlcioneTreviso

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
AlcioneTreviso
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
AlcioneTreviso
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AlcioneTreviso

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AlcioneTreviso
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
AlcioneTreviso
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AlcioneTreviso

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Alcione is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Alcione · 1 pts / match - Treviso

Alcione - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Treviso - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1
AlcioneTreviso
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AlcioneTreviso
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AlcioneTreviso
1.5Average goals (1st half)1
AlcioneTreviso
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AlcioneTreviso
50%No goal before half-time50%
AlcioneTreviso

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.5
AlcioneTreviso
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
AlcioneTreviso
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
AlcioneTreviso
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1
AlcioneTreviso
100%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AlcioneTreviso
50%No goal after half-time50%
AlcioneTreviso

Alcione - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Treviso - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Alcione - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.50.5
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2
Treviso - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.50
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Alcione
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Treviso
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Alcione

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.90
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Treviso

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

AlcioneLigaTreviso
Average goals in match• 2.002.04• 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 50%46%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%38%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%35%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%54%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%62%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.04
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AlcioneYellow cardEmerick Lopes
  2. AlcioneYellow cardDaniele Ciappellano
  3. TrevisoYellow cardDavide Bove
  4. AlcioneYellow cardJonathan Pitou
  5. AlcioneGoalAlex RolfiniAssist: Samuele Parlati
  6. TrevisoYellow cardDaniel Cappelletti
  7. AlcioneSubstitutionOn: Giorgio PuzzoliOff: Jonathan Pitou
  8. AlcioneYellow cardAlex Rolfini
  9. TrevisoSubstitutionOn: Carlo MellinoOff: Federico Romeo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Alcione vs Treviso?

The Serie C Group A match finished Alcione 1:1 Treviso. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Alcione vs Treviso?

Alcione score 1.50 goals per game on average and Treviso 1.00. The Serie C Group A average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Alcione's matches and 50% of Treviso's.

What form are Alcione and Treviso in?

Over the last 5 games Alcione have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Treviso 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Alcione vs Treviso?

The statistical background for Alcione vs Treviso — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.