Argentina - Primera DivisiónEstadio José María MinellaData current as of 17 October 2026

Aldosivi vs Banfield: match statistics

Aldosivi crest
Aldosivi
3 : 1half-time 2:0
Banfield crest
Banfield

Aldosivi vs Banfield: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aldosivi played Banfield in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Estadio José María Minella. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Aldosivi: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Banfield: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aldosivi scores 0.48 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Banfield scores 1.04 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aldosivi 48%, Banfield 48%. Over 2.5: Aldosivi 26%, Banfield 43%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Banfield has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.26. Aldosivi: 11.3 shots per match, Banfield: 12.1.

Match halves

Aldosivi: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.17. Banfield: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Aldosivi: 16-30 (3 goals). Banfield: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.07 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Aldosivi have not won a single home match, but as many as 73% of their games at home have ended in draws, which strongly supports the possibility of a points split. The hosts average just 0.45 goals at home and have failed to score in 55% of such matches, despite creating chances worth 1.48 xG per game. Banfield also struggle for results away from home: they have lost 67% of their matches, won only 17%, and concede an average of 1.33 goals. The visitors are slightly more efficient in front of goal, scoring 0.75 goals away from home with an 8% shot conversion rate compared to Aldosivi’s 3%, but their recent form stands at just 1 win in 5 matches. Both teams have conceded 9 goals in their last five games, so a low-scoring draw is the most likely outcome, although neither side provides strong grounds for clear favoritism.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No scenario is slightly more likely, primarily due to Banfield’s limited attacking potential: they score an average of just 0.75 goals away from home and fail to score in 42% of their matches. Aldosivi keep a clean sheet in 36% of their home games, further increasing the likelihood that the visitors will once again finish without scoring. The hosts have stronger attacking metrics, creating an average of 1.63 xG and registering 4.82 shots on target per match, while Banfield record 1.14 xG and 2.92 shots on target. BTTS landed in 60% of the teams’ last five matches, but Aldosivi scored only 3 goals during that period, averaging 0.6 per game. Their seasonal BTTS rates—45% for Aldosivi and 50% for Banfield, compared with the league average of 44%—do not indicate a sufficiently strong signal in favour of both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: the league-wide average is just 2.08 goals, while 82% of Aldosivi matches and 83% of Banfield matches finished with under 3.5 goals. Aldosivi generate an average of 1.63 xG, while Banfield allow opponents 2.04 xG, giving the hosts a realistic chance of scoring around one goal. The visitors average just 0.75 goals per match this season, although Aldosivi’s weaker defense, conceding an average of 1.18 goals and 1.58 xG, raises their projection to 1.08. The teams’ last five matches were more open, with both sides conceding 1.8 goals per game, but a total of at least four goals remains less likely than a 0-3 goals scenario. The strongest option is under 3.5, supported by the very high season percentages of matches finishing below this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Aldosivi win at full-time, as goalless or level first halves are common: the hosts were level at the break in 45% of their matches, while Banfield recorded a half-time draw in as many as 67%. Both teams play cautiously before the break, averaging just 0.18 goals for Aldosivi and 0.42 for Banfield, compared with first-half averages of 0.82 and 0.83 goals conceded, respectively. After the interval, the hosts’ advantage increases significantly: they average 1.18 goals scored and 0.55 conceded, while Banfield score only 0.33 and allow opponents 0.92 goals. Aldosivi also have stronger full-season statistics, averaging 1.55 points per match compared with Banfield’s 0.67, a 45% win rate versus 17%, and an xG of 1.63 compared with the visitors’ 1.14. The hosts’ poor current run, with no win in their last five matches, reduces confidence in the pick, but does not alter the strong signal pointing to a superior second half against a team that loses 67% of its away matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
AldosiviBanfield
20Shots13
AldosiviBanfield
9Shots on target3
AldosiviBanfield
2.2xG1.35
AldosiviBanfield
8Corners4
AldosiviBanfield
43Dangerous attacks43
AldosiviBanfield
13Fouls11
AldosiviBanfield
4Cards4
AldosiviBanfield

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.48Goals scored / match1.04
AldosiviBanfield
1.3Goals conceded / match1.26
AldosiviBanfield
42%Average possession40%
AldosiviBanfield
2.87Shots on target / match3.83
AldosiviBanfield

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.35Shots per match12.09
AldosiviBanfield
2.87Shots on target3.83
AldosiviBanfield
4.2%Shot conversion8.6%
AldosiviBanfield
42%Possession40%
AldosiviBanfield
1.26xG for1.37
AldosiviBanfield
1.68xG against1.82
AldosiviBanfield

Shooting quality

Aldosivi: BalancedBanfield: Balanced
AldosiviBanfield
Accuracy (shots on target)25%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banfield is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Aldosivi · 0.8 pts / match - Banfield

Aldosivi
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W43% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-10-13
0.43 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-8-3
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.93BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Banfield
DLWLL
Season result split
30% W17% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banfield is 117% better for: goals scored per match.

0.48 goals / match - Aldosivi · 1.04 goals / match - Banfield

Aldosivi scoring profile: mixed

Aldosivi scores in 48% of matches (11 of 23 matches), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

Banfield scoring profile: strong

Banfield scores in 65% of matches (15 of 23 matches), while Aldosivi keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

11Goals scored (season)24
AldosiviBanfield
30Goals conceded (season)29
AldosiviBanfield
1.78Average goals in match2.3
AldosiviBanfield
4Goals scored (last 5)4
AldosiviBanfield
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
AldosiviBanfield

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal65%
AldosiviBanfield
0%2 goals30%
AldosiviBanfield
0%3 goals9%
AldosiviBanfield
0%4 goals0%
AldosiviBanfield

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal74%
AldosiviBanfield
39%2 goals39%
AldosiviBanfield
13%3 goals13%
AldosiviBanfield
0%4 goals0%
AldosiviBanfield

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
AldosiviBanfield
0%BTTS in both halves4%
AldosiviBanfield
0%Scored in both halves13%
AldosiviBanfield

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
AldosiviBanfield
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
AldosiviBanfield
80%BTTS - last 540%
AldosiviBanfield

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
AldosiviBanfield
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
AldosiviBanfield
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
AldosiviBanfield

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
AldosiviBanfield
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
AldosiviBanfield
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
AldosiviBanfield

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Banfield is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.96 pts / match - Aldosivi · 1.09 pts / match - Banfield

Aldosivi - half-time state
17% leading43% draw39% trailing
Banfield - half-time state
17% leading57% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.96Points per match (1st half)1.09
AldosiviBanfield
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.3
AldosiviBanfield
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
AldosiviBanfield
0.87Average goals (1st half)0.83
AldosiviBanfield
48%Clean sheet before half-time65%
AldosiviBanfield
70%No goal before half-time70%
AldosiviBanfield

After half-time (2nd half)

0.65Points per match (2nd half)1.3
AldosiviBanfield
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
AldosiviBanfield
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.74
AldosiviBanfield
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.48
AldosiviBanfield
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
AldosiviBanfield
83%No goal after half-time52%
AldosiviBanfield

Aldosivi - second-half results

4% W52% D43% L
22
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Banfield - second-half results

30% W39% D30% L
25
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Aldosivi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Banfield - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aldosivi
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
6
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
7
61-75
2
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Banfield
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
4
5
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aldosivi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.78
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
41%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Banfield

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

AldosiviLigaBanfield
Average goals in match▼ 1.782.07▲ 2.30
Both teams scored▲ 48%44%▲ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 26%36%▲ 43%
Clean sheets▼ 22%35%▼ 26%
Goal before half-time▲ 70%59%▼ 52%
Goal after half-time▼ 52%71%▲ 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.07
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AldosiviYellow cardBautista Dadín
  2. BanfieldYellow cardNicolás Meriano
  3. BanfieldYellow cardTomás Alexander Adoryán
  4. BanfieldGoalRenzo Malanca
  5. AldosiviYellow cardFelipe Anso
  6. BanfieldSubstitutionOn: Lautaro Martín GómezOff: Nicolás Meriano
  7. AldosiviSubstitutionOn: Tomás FernándezOff: Bautista Dadín
  8. BanfieldGoalMatías Hernández
  9. AldosiviYellow cardMateo Sebastián Vales
  10. BanfieldYellow cardLautaro Cano
  11. BanfieldSubstitutionOn: Federico Marcelo AnselmoOff: Matías Hernández
  12. AldosiviSubstitutionOn: Nicolás Mauricio ZalazarOff: Felipe Anso
  13. BanfieldYellow cardDavid Zalazar
  14. AldosiviSubstitutionOn: Andrés Eliseo ChávezOff: Andrés Vombergar
  15. AldosiviSubstitutionOn: Francisco PerruzziOff: Lucas Nahuel Castro
  16. AldosiviYellow cardRodrigo González

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Aldosivi 2 - 0 - 2 Banfield. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Banfield
2 : 0
Aldosivi
CA Banfield
0 : 1
CA Aldosivi
CA Aldosivi
2 : 1
CA Banfield
Aldosivi
1 : 3
Banfield

FAQ

What was the result of Aldosivi vs Banfield?

The Primera División match finished Aldosivi 3:1 Banfield. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Aldosivi and Banfield?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Aldosivi won 2, Banfield won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Aldosivi vs Banfield?

Aldosivi score 0.48 goals per game on average and Banfield 1.04. The Primera División average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Aldosivi's matches and 48% of Banfield's.

What form are Aldosivi and Banfield in?

Over the last 5 games Aldosivi have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Banfield 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aldosivi vs Banfield?

The statistical background for Aldosivi vs Banfield — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.