Alemannia Aachen vs Hansa Rostock: match statistics
Alemannia Aachen vs Hansa Rostock: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Alemannia Aachen played Hansa Rostock in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Alemannia Aachen: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Hansa Rostock: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Alemannia Aachen scores 1.89 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Hansa Rostock scores 1.83 and concedes 1.20. League average: 3.15 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Alemannia Aachen 71%, Hansa Rostock 54%. Over 2.5: Alemannia Aachen 74%, Hansa Rostock 63%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Hansa Rostock has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.51. Alemannia Aachen: 12.3 shots per match, Hansa Rostock: 14.6.
Match halves
Alemannia Aachen: half-time lead 49%, second-half goals 0.94. Hansa Rostock: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.97.
Goals by minute
Alemannia Aachen: 16-30 (14 goals). Hansa Rostock: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3. Liga: 3.15 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Alemannia Aachen holds a clear advantage in recent form over the last 5 matches: 4 wins and 1 draw, 13 goals scored and only 4 conceded (averaging 2.6 points per game), while Hansa Rostock in their last 5 have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses with a goal record of 11:10 (averaging 1.4 points per game). Season-long, both teams have comparable attacks — Aachen 66 goals versus Hansa 64, and average xG of 1.53 (Aachen) vs 1.55 (Hansa), with a similar shot volume ~12.5 per game. The biggest difference is defensively: Hansa concedes on average 0.76 goals in away matches and has 53% clean sheets on the road, whereas Aachen at home concedes 1.65 goals and has only 18% clean sheets. At the same time Hansa have conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches, which weakens their recent defensive form and gives Aachen an opportunity to exploit their strong attacking form. Considering form (Aachen 2.6 pts vs Hansa 1.4 pts in the last 5), recent scoring effectiveness (13 vs 11) and the season-long defensive stability of the visitors, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Alemannia has a seasonal BTTS rate of 72% versus Hansa's 35%, but in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS at 80%, indicating a trend shift. The home side is more offensive: averaging 2.0 goals per game (xG 1.96), 16.56 shots and 6.06 on target, while Hansa averages 1.65 goals (xG 1.55), 12.59 shots and 4.76 on target, so Aachen generates more chances. In the last 5 fixtures Alemannia scored 13 and conceded 4 (2.6/0.8 per game), whereas Hansa scored 11 and conceded 10 (2.2/2.0), showing the visitors have been conceding more recently. Although Hansa has 53% of matches with a clean sheet this season versus Aachen's 17%, the league-wide BTTS level is 64% and seasonal xG against figures are similar (1.34 vs 1.35), therefore the higher probability favors a Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Comparing xG: hosts have an attacking xG of 1.96 while Hansa concedes 1.35 xG per match; guests have an attacking xG of 1.55 while Alemannia concedes 1.34 xG — this yields a projection of 1.66 goals for Alemannia and 1.45 for Hansa, totaling about 3.11 goals. This season Alemannia has 89% of matches over 1.5 and 72% over 2.5, Hansa 59% and 53% respectively, with the league average for over 2.5 at 64%, which supports an expectation of goals. In the last 5 matches Alemannia scored 13 and conceded 4, Hansa scored 11 and conceded 10, and both teams recorded 80% of matches over 2.5, indicating offensive momentum. A Poisson model with lambda=3.11 gives ~82% probability for over 1.5, ~60% for over 2.5 and ~38% for over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal from the data is an 'over' bet at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side have strong recent first-half form: in 4 of their last 5 matches they led at the break (80%), and in those games they averaged 1.4 goals by half-time while conceding 0.2, which strongly supports Alemannia holding a lead after 45 minutes. Creation metrics corroborate the hosts’ advantage: Alemannia’s average xG is 1.96 versus Hans’ 1.55, and the hosts record 6.06 shots on target per game compared to the visitors’ 4.76, so they have clearer control of good scoring opportunities. However, Hans are a resilient opponent this season — they have a higher points-per-game average (1.82 vs the hosts’ 1.61) and keep a clean sheet in 53% of their matches, which gives them the capability to stage turnarounds in the second half. Based on these data the most likely scenario is the hosts leading at half-time and ultimately winning the match (1/1), with a strong but smaller signal for a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1). I assess the probability of 1/1 at 34% and X/1 at 20%; I distribute the remaining scenarios proportionally lower due to Hans’ seasonal resilience but the clear recent first-half form of the hosts.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Alemannia Aachen | Hansa Rostock | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Alemannia Aachen is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Alemannia Aachen · 1.4 pts / match - Hansa Rostock
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hansa Rostock is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.57 goals / match - Alemannia Aachen · 1.2 goals / match - Hansa Rostock
Alemannia Aachen scores in 80% of matches (28 of 35 matches), while Hansa Rostock keeps a clean sheet in 34% (12 of 35 matches).
Hansa Rostock scores in 77% of matches (27 of 35 matches), while Alemannia Aachen keeps a clean sheet in 11% (4 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Alemannia Aachen
Over / Under - Hansa Rostock
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Alemannia Aachen is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.74 pts / match - Alemannia Aachen · 1.49 pts / match - Hansa Rostock
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Alemannia Aachen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 49% of matches and wins 49%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hansa Rostock - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Alemannia Aachen
Hansa Rostock
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Alemannia Aachen | Liga | Hansa Rostock | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.46 | 3.15 | ▼ 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 64% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 74% | 64% | • 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 21% | ▲ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 83% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Alemannia Aachen 0 - 1 - 0 Hansa Rostock. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Alemannia Aachen vs Hansa Rostock?
The 3. Liga match finished Alemannia Aachen 1:1 Hansa Rostock. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Alemannia Aachen vs Hansa Rostock?
Alemannia Aachen score 1.89 goals per game on average and Hansa Rostock 1.83. The 3. Liga average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Alemannia Aachen's matches and 54% of Hansa Rostock's.
What form are Alemannia Aachen and Hansa Rostock in?
Over the last 5 games Alemannia Aachen have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Hansa Rostock 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Alemannia Aachen vs Hansa Rostock?
The statistical background for Alemannia Aachen vs Hansa Rostock — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


