All Boys vs Racing Córdoba: match statistics
All Boys vs Racing Córdoba: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
All Boys played Racing Córdoba in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 7 June 2026. Venue: Estadio Islas Malvinas. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
All Boys: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Racing Córdoba: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
All Boys scores 0.53 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Racing Córdoba scores 0.87 and concedes 1.20. League average: 1.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: All Boys 27%, Racing Córdoba 40%. Over 2.5: All Boys 27%, Racing Córdoba 53%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Racing Córdoba has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.44. All Boys: 11.5 shots per match, Racing Córdoba: 12.7.
Match halves
All Boys: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.40. Racing Córdoba: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
All Boys: 76-90+ (4 goals). Racing Córdoba: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Prim B Nacional: 1.83 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1): All Boys concede only 0.25 goals per home match on average and have a 75% clean sheet rate, while Racing Córdoba concede 1.57 goals on average as visitors and have a 14% clean sheet rate. The hosts generate more high-quality chances — their home xG is 1.53 versus Racing’s 1.32; they average 3.88 shots on target and 12.38 shots per match compared to visitors’ 3.57 shots on target and 11.14 shots. Form also favors All Boys: in the last 5 matches they average 1.0 point per game (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses), whereas Racing averages only 0.4 points and 0 wins in their last five. Both teams are inefficient offensively — hosts score 0.63 goals per home game, visitors 0.57 as away team — so I expect a low-scoring outcome, most likely 1:0 or 2:0. Considering the advantage in clean sheets (75% vs 14%), higher average possession (50% vs 40%) and superior xG (1.53 vs 1.32), I assess a home victory as the most probable result.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - No because season-long indicators show a low frequency of both teams scoring: All Boys BTTS 38%, Racing Córdoba 43%, league average 39%. All Boys average 1.13 goals scored and 0.88 conceded per match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of games, while Racing score only 0.57 goals per match and fail to score in 57% of matches, which reduces BTTS probability (1-0.38)*(1-0.57)≈27%. xG partially argues for goals — xG_for 1.59 vs 1.32 for Racing and average shots on target 3.75 vs 3.57 — therefore I adjust the simple model upward to about 35% for 'Yes'. In the last 5 matches BTTS was 40% for the home side and 60% for the away side, but both teams conceded on average 1.6 goals, which together with All Boys' 50% clean sheets keeps the 'No' scenario stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Season total xG is 2.91 (1.59 for All Boys and 1.32 for Racing Córdoba), while actual average goals are only 1.70 (1.13 + 0.57), indicating many created chances with low conversion. Shot counts and conversion rates give a simple estimate of 14.0×8.0%=1.12 for the home side and 11.14×5.0%=0.56 for the visitors; averaging this with xG yields a forecast of 1.36 for All Boys and 0.94 for Racing (total 2.30). Historically, Over 1.5 occurred in 63% of All Boys matches and 71% of Racing matches, while Over 2.5 occurred in 50% and 57% respectively — so the signal for >1.5 is stronger than for >2.5. All Boys have kept a clean sheet in 50% of games, but Racing concedes an average of 1.57 goals and has only 14% clean sheets, which increases the probability of at least two goals. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (forecast 82% for Over 1.5, 58% for Over 2.5 and 17% for Over 3.5), because the high combined xG of 2.91 correlated with historical 63%/71% rates favors Over despite limited conversion.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw looks like the most reliable signal: the home side were level at the break in 50% of their matches (4 of 8), and the visitors in 57% (4 of 7), so in my pricing HT draw scenarios sum to 58% (X/1 35% + X/X 18% + X/2 5%). All Boys have a clear advantage in creating chances and after the break: the home xG is 1.59 versus 1.32 for the visitors, and the home side score an average of 0.88 goals after the break compared to 0.29 for Racing Córdoba (0.88 vs 0.29). Additionally, the home team are in better form and defence: they average 1.13 goals per match and concede 0.88, have a 38% win rate and 50% clean sheets this season, while the visitors average 0.57 scored and 1.57 conceded, winning only 14% of matches and keeping 14% clean sheets. As a result, I consider the most likely scenario to be a draw at half-time and a home victory at full-time (X/1) — I assign it a 35% probability; alternatives are draw/draw (X/X 18%) or the home side leading from the start and holding on (1/1 15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| All Boys | Racing Córdoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.16 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
All Boys is 150% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - All Boys · 0.4 pts / match - Racing Córdoba
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing Córdoba is 64% better for: goals scored per match.
0.53 goals / match - All Boys · 0.87 goals / match - Racing Córdoba
All Boys is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - All Boys · 1.2 goals / match - Racing Córdoba
All Boys scores in 40% of matches (6 of 15 matches), while Racing Córdoba keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
Racing Córdoba scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while All Boys keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - All Boys
Over / Under - Racing Córdoba
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing Córdoba is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.87 pts / match - All Boys · 0.93 pts / match - Racing Córdoba
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
All Boys - second-half results
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Racing Córdoba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
All Boys
Racing Córdoba
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| All Boys | Liga | Racing Córdoba | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.53 | 1.83 | ▲ 2.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 38% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 27% | 28% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 40% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 27% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 69% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): All Boys 1 - 1 - 0 Racing Córdoba. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of All Boys vs Racing Córdoba?
The Prim B Nacional match finished All Boys 1:1 Racing Córdoba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between All Boys and Racing Córdoba?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches All Boys won 1, Racing Córdoba won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before All Boys vs Racing Córdoba?
All Boys score 0.53 goals per game on average and Racing Córdoba 0.87. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 27% of All Boys's matches and 40% of Racing Córdoba's.
What form are All Boys and Racing Córdoba in?
Over the last 5 games All Boys have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Racing Córdoba 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for All Boys vs Racing Córdoba?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for All Boys vs Racing Córdoba: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


