Alta vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Alta vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Alta played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Alta: 0-2-0, 1.00 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Alta scores 0.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.52 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Alta 50%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 100%. Over 2.5: Alta 0%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 100%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Alta has higher xG: 2.16 vs 0.65. Alta: 20.0 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 5.0.
Match halves
Alta: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Alta: 16-30 (1 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Alta show a strong tendency to draw at home (100% home draw% in available matches) despite high possession and shot volume, indicating low conversion against stable defences. Chattanooga Red Wolves are efficient away (100% win% in available data, no FTS) with high conversion, increasing their scoring chances. xG discrepancy (Alta 2.16 home vs Chattanooga xG for 0.65 away) suggests hosts create more chances but fail to convert. Both teams are defensively solid (low GA), pointing to a low-scoring draw. Given recent forms and contradictory indicators, a draw appears most likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Recent indicators favor BTTS: both teams generate >1 xG in L5 (home 1.75, away 1.44) with comparable GF/GA (home 5-4, away 6-5), showing offensive capability. Season samples show away side 100% season BTTS and league BTTS 57%, increasing mutual scoring likelihood. Possible season sample gaps for home are offset by L5 form (wddld) suggesting goalful matches. Shot and xG profiles favor at least one goal each; lack of clear CS data weakens 'no' argument. Recommendation: BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Available stats indicate Chattanooga Red Wolves offensive edge (avg 2.0 goals season, xG 0.65) and league avg ~2.68, boosting probability of at least two goals. Alta’s data is limited or missing (0.0 in several metrics), but last-5 shows both sides can score. Last5 xG estimates (1.75 home, 1.44 away) support ~2.6 expected goals total. Given stronger confidence in exceeding 1.5 goals, recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest data-backed signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data indicate a clear advantage for Chattanooga Red Wolves in offense and efficiency, while Alta record no goals and poor seasonal results. HT stats show frequent draws for the visitors and strong Red Wolves numbers in second halves (scoring and winning after the break). Low xG and lack of attacking threat from the hosts increase probability of a goalless or level first half. Considering these factors the most likely scenario is HT draw and FT away win (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Alta | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.10 | 1.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Alta · 3 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 300% better for: goals scored per match.
0.5 goals / match - Alta · 2 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Alta is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.5 goals / match - Alta · 1 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Alta scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Alta keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Alta
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Alta - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Alta
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Alta | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.00 | 2.52 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 48% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 28% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 70% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Alta 1 - 1 - 0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Alta vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Alta 2:2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Alta and Chattanooga Red Wolves?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Alta won 1, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Alta vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Alta score 0.50 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 2.00. The USL League One average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Alta's matches and 100% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Alta and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Alta have a 0-2-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Alta vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Alta vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.