Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni Park AluminijData current as of 18 October 2026

Aluminij vs Bravo: match statistics

Aluminij crest
Aluminij
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Bravo crest
Bravo

Aluminij vs Bravo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aluminij played Bravo in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Športni Park Aluminij. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Aluminij: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Bravo: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aluminij scores 1.14 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Bravo scores 1.14 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aluminij 43%, Bravo 43%. Over 2.5: Aluminij 29%, Bravo 43%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Bravo has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.21. Aluminij: 9.3 shots per match, Bravo: 13.6.

Match halves

Aluminij: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43. Bravo: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Aluminij: 0-15 (3 goals). Bravo: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-3. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bravo sit 3rd, one place above Aluminij, and have averaged 1.6 points per match over their last five games, compared with the hosts’ 1.4. The visitors are particularly dangerous away from home: they have won 50% of such matches, averaging 13.75 shots and 5 shots on target, while Aluminij record 10.25 and 3.25 respectively at home. Both teams average 1.25 goals scored and 1.00 conceded on their respective home grounds, but Bravo are less likely to fail to score, doing so in 25% of away games, whereas Aluminij have been held scoreless in as many as 50% of their home matches. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 50% of away fixtures, compared with Aluminij’s 25% at home, which could prove decisive in giving them a slight edge. However, the hosts create an average of 1.31 xG, while Bravo allow opponents 2.09 xG away from home, making a draw a very realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams scoring is strengthened by their current form: both Aluminij and Bravo had BTTS in 3 of their last 5 matches, equating to 60% of games. During this period, Aluminij averaged 1.6 goals scored and Bravo 1.2, while the two teams conceded 1.2 and 1.0 goals per match, respectively. Their attacking potential is supported by the xG data: the hosts create an average of 1.67 xG and the visitors 1.50, while their defences allow as much as 1.88 and 2.09 xG. Bravo averages 5.0 shots on target per match compared with Aluminij’s 3.67, which should increase the visitors’ chances of scoring. The pick is not particularly strong, as Aluminij’s BTTS rate for the entire season stands at only 33%, while Bravo kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches; however, the current goal-scoring data marginally favours the BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The goal profiles of both teams point to a match more likely to stay below four goals: Aluminij average 1.00 goal scored and 1.33 conceded, while Bravo average 1.25 and 1.00, respectively. The 3.5-goal line has not been exceeded in any of Aluminij’s matches to date and in only 25% of Bravo’s games, providing very strong support for the under 3.5 goals pick. Likewise, the share of matches with at least three goals stands at just 33% for the hosts and 50% for the visitors, despite both teams recording 40% such results in their last five matches. Higher xG against figures—1.88 for Aluminij and 2.09 for Bravo—increase the likelihood of 1–2 goals for either side, but shot conversion remains low at 8% and 9%. The 2.50-goal projection suggests realistic possibilities of a 1:1, 2:0 or 2:1 scoreline, while leaving a clear safety margin for under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Bravo clearly boasts the stronger first-half profile: they were leading at the break in 75% of their matches, while Aluminij were trailing after 45 minutes in 67% of games. The visitors have yet to concede before half-time, whereas the hosts average just 0.33 goals during this period, reinforcing the scenario of Bravo taking an early lead. Across the season, Bravo have won 50% of their matches and average 1.75 points per game, compared with Aluminij’s 33% win rate and 1.33 points per game. The visitors are also more efficient in front of goal, recording 5.0 shots on target per match compared with the hosts’ 3.67, making a Bravo lead to be maintained through full-time the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
AluminijBravo
8Shots14
AluminijBravo
2Shots on target5
AluminijBravo
0.97xG1.56
AluminijBravo
2Corners4
AluminijBravo
45Dangerous attacks45
AluminijBravo
2Fouls1
AluminijBravo
3Cards1
AluminijBravo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.14Goals scored / match1.14
AluminijBravo
1.14Goals conceded / match1.14
AluminijBravo
42%Average possession41%
AluminijBravo
3.14Shots on target / match4.43
AluminijBravo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.29Shots per match13.57
AluminijBravo
3.14Shots on target4.43
AluminijBravo
12.3%Shot conversion8.4%
AluminijBravo
42%Possession41%
AluminijBravo
1.21xG for1.57
AluminijBravo
1.53xG against1.99
AluminijBravo

Shooting quality

Aluminij: Counter-attackingBravo: Balanced
AluminijBravo
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bravo is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Aluminij · 1.6 pts / match - Bravo

Aluminij
DWWLL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Bravo
WDDLW
Season result split
43% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-2
1.57 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aluminij scoring profile: mixed

Aluminij scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Bravo scoring profile: very strong

Bravo scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

8Goals scored (season)8
AluminijBravo
8Goals conceded (season)8
AluminijBravo
2.29Average goals in match2.29
AluminijBravo
8Goals scored (last 5)6
AluminijBravo
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
AluminijBravo

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal71%
AluminijBravo
29%2 goals43%
AluminijBravo
29%3 goals0%
AluminijBravo
14%4 goals0%
AluminijBravo

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal57%
AluminijBravo
29%2 goals29%
AluminijBravo
0%3 goals29%
AluminijBravo
0%4 goals0%
AluminijBravo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time0%
AluminijBravo
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AluminijBravo
14%Scored in both halves43%
AluminijBravo

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
AluminijBravo
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
AluminijBravo
60%BTTS - last 560%
AluminijBravo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
AluminijBravo
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
AluminijBravo
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AluminijBravo

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
AluminijBravo
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
AluminijBravo
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
AluminijBravo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bravo is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Aluminij · 1.86 pts / match - Bravo

Aluminij - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing
Bravo - half-time state
57% leading14% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.86
AluminijBravo
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.57
AluminijBravo
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
AluminijBravo
1.14Average goals (1st half)0.86
AluminijBravo
71%Clean sheet before half-time71%
AluminijBravo
57%No goal before half-time43%
AluminijBravo

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.57
AluminijBravo
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
AluminijBravo
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
AluminijBravo
1.14Average goals (2nd half)1.43
AluminijBravo
43%Clean sheet after half-time57%
AluminijBravo
86%No goal after half-time43%
AluminijBravo

Aluminij - second-half results

14% W29% D57% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bravo - second-half results

43% W29% D29% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 43%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Aluminij - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Bravo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aluminij
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Bravo
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aluminij

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Bravo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

AluminijLigaBravo
Average goals in match▼ 2.292.60▼ 2.29
Both teams scored▼ 43%51%▼ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%43%• 43%
Clean sheets▼ 14%29%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▼ 43%71%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%86%• 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AluminijRed cardAnte Bekavac
  2. BravoSubstitutionOn: Raúl Parra ArtalOff: Divine Omoregie
  3. AluminijSubstitutionOn: Domen ZajšekOff: Hanus Sørensen
  4. AluminijSubstitutionOn: Simon RoginaOff: Petar Petriško
  5. BravoSubstitutionOn: Andrej PecarOff: Aldin Jakupović
  6. AluminijSubstitutionOn: Murat BajrajOff: Bamba Susso
  7. AluminijYellow cardDomen Zajšek

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Aluminij 1 - 0 - 3 Bravo. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 75% matches.

NK Aluminij
0 : 1
AŠK Bravo Publikum
AŠK Bravo Publikum
2 : 1
NK Aluminij
NK Aluminij
1 : 3
AŠK Bravo Publikum
AŠK Bravo Publikum
1 : 2
NK Aluminij

FAQ

What was the result of Aluminij vs Bravo?

The PrvaLiga match finished Aluminij 0:0 Bravo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Aluminij and Bravo?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Aluminij won 1, Bravo won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Aluminij vs Bravo?

Aluminij score 1.14 goals per game on average and Bravo 1.14. The PrvaLiga average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Aluminij's matches and 43% of Bravo's.

What form are Aluminij and Bravo in?

Over the last 5 games Aluminij have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Bravo 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminij vs Bravo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.