Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueImam Khomeini StadiumData current as of 16 October 2026

Aluminium Arak vs Malavan: match statistics

Aluminium Arak crest
Aluminium Arak
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Malavan crest
Malavan

Aluminium Arak vs Malavan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aluminium Arak played Malavan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 8 October 2026. Venue: Imam Khomeini Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Aluminium Arak: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Malavan: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aluminium Arak scores 1.33 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Malavan scores 0.83 and concedes 1.33. League average: 1.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aluminium Arak 33%, Malavan 50%. Over 2.5: Aluminium Arak 33%, Malavan 50%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 20%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Aluminium Arak: -1.0 shots per match, Malavan: -1.0.

Match halves

Aluminium Arak: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50. Malavan: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Aluminium Arak: 31-45+ (3 goals). Malavan: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.75 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 20%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Aluminium Arak sit 4th and remain unbeaten after 6 rounds, while Malavan are 12th and have lost 3 of their 6 matches. The hosts have a clear defensive advantage: they have conceded 3 goals so far, compared with 8 for the visitors, including 7 in their last 5 matches. However, Aluminium’s home record points towards a draw—all 3 home matches have ended level, with an average of just 0.67 goals scored. Malavan average 1 goal scored away from home but concede 1.67 and have yet to keep a clean sheet, so they have a chance to score, though holding on to a lead may prove more difficult. Given the hosts’ strong defence and their run of home draws so far, another stalemate looks the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for at least one team failing to score is Aluminium Arak’s limited attacking output: the hosts average 0.67 goals per match and have failed to find the net in 67% of their games. Malavan average 1.0 goal, but that figure has fallen to 0.8 over their last 5 matches, while Aluminium conceded just 0.6 goals per game over the same period. Although Malavan concede an average of 1.67 goals, giving the hosts a chance to score, BTTS has landed in only 40% of each team’s last 5 matches. In addition, both teams scored in just 31% of league matches, reinforcing a cautious assessment of the chances of both sides finding the net. Therefore, BTTS - No looks more likely, although the visitors’ weaker defence means BTTS - Yes cannot be ruled out.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been breached in any of Aluminium Arak’s home matches or Malavan’s away matches so far. The hosts average 0.67 goals scored at home, while the visitors average 1.00 away; Aluminium also concede just 1.00 goal per home match on average. The last five matches also do not point to a high-scoring game: Aluminium averaged 1.2 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while Malavan averaged 0.8 scored and 1.4 conceded. The league average is 1.75 goals, and only 20% of league matches finish with at least three goals. With a projected total of 1.93 goals, Under 3.5 therefore offers a stronger signal than Under 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Aluminium were level at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches and failed to score in the first half in all three of their home games, making a draw after 45 minutes the most likely outcome. The hosts’ form supports a subsequent win: over their last 5 matches, they averaged 1.8 points compared with Malavan’s 1.2 and remained unbeaten, while the visitors suffered 3 defeats. Aluminium scored an average of 1.2 goals per match during this period, while Malavan conceded 1.4, giving the hosts a chance to break the deadlock. The visitors have recently conceded an average of 0.8 goals after the break, while the hosts have scored 0.4, so X/1 is the best-supported pick, although Aluminium’s low scoring output leaves a considerable chance of X/X.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1Shots-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1Shots on target-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0xG0
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1Corners-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0Dangerous attacks0
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1Fouls-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1Cards-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Aluminium ArakMalavan
1.33Goals scored / match0.83
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0.5Goals conceded / match1.33
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1%Average possession-1%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1Shots on target / match-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1Shots on target-1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-133.3%Shot conversion-83.3%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
-1%Possession-1%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0xG for0
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0xG against0
Aluminium ArakMalavan

Shooting quality

Aluminium Arak: BalancedMalavan: Balanced
Aluminium ArakMalavan
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Aluminium Arak is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Aluminium Arak · 1.2 pts / match - Malavan

Aluminium Arak
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 at home
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Malavan
WLLLW
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aluminium Arak is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Aluminium Arak · 0.83 goals / match - Malavan

Aluminium Arak is 166% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Aluminium Arak · 1.33 goals / match - Malavan

Aluminium Arak scoring profile: very strong

Aluminium Arak scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Malavan keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

Malavan scoring profile: more difficult

Malavan scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Aluminium Arak keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

8Goals scored (season)5
Aluminium ArakMalavan
3Goals conceded (season)8
Aluminium ArakMalavan
1.83Average goals in match2.17
Aluminium ArakMalavan
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Aluminium ArakMalavan
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
Aluminium ArakMalavan

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal50%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
67%2 goals33%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0%3 goals0%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0%4 goals0%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
17%2 goals17%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0%3 goals17%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0%4 goals0%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

31%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time17%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
17%BTTS in both halves0%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
50%Scored in both halves17%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
40%BTTS - last 540%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aluminium Arak is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Aluminium Arak · 1 pts / match - Malavan

Aluminium Arak - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Malavan - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Aluminium ArakMalavan
1.17Average goals (1st half)1
Aluminium ArakMalavan
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
33%No goal before half-time67%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)0.83
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Aluminium ArakMalavan
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Aluminium ArakMalavan
83%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Aluminium ArakMalavan
50%No goal after half-time67%
Aluminium ArakMalavan

Aluminium Arak - second-half results

33% W67% D0% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Malavan - second-half results

17% W33% D50% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Aluminium Arak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Malavan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aluminium Arak
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Malavan
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aluminium Arak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Malavan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.83
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Aluminium ArakLigaMalavan
Average goals in match• 1.831.75▲ 2.17
Both teams scored▲ 33%31%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 33%20%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 67%44%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%49%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%66%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.75
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
0.97
Home goals / match
0.78
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
49%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Aluminium ArakGoalBahram Goudarzi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Aluminium Arak 0 - 0 - 1 Malavan. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Aluminium Arak
0 : 1
Malavan

FAQ

What was the result of Aluminium Arak vs Malavan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Aluminium Arak 1:1 Malavan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Aluminium Arak vs Malavan?

Aluminium Arak score 1.33 goals per game on average and Malavan 0.83. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 20% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Aluminium Arak's matches and 50% of Malavan's.

What form are Aluminium Arak and Malavan in?

Over the last 5 games Aluminium Arak have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Malavan 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminium Arak vs Malavan?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.