Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Amagaju vs Marines: match statistics

Amagaju crest
Amagaju
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Marines crest
Marines
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Amagaju is in catastrophic form, sitting in 17th place in the table with just 3 wins in the season and zero wins in the last 5 matches. The hosts have not scored a goal in the last 5 meetings and have a mere 0% win rate at home this season, with 75% losses at their own stadium. Marines, despite unstable form recently, present significantly better offensive statistics with 19 goals in the season and a 33% win rate in away games. The guests have a three times higher shot conversion rate (12% vs 4%) and a better average xG (1.41 vs 1.12), which confirms their qualitative advantage. Given Amagaju's drastic weakness, especially in attack, and Marines' relatively solid results on the road, I expect a victory for the guests, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the recent form problems of both teams.

Amagaju vs Marines: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amagaju play Marines in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match date is 30 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Amagaju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Marines: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amagaju scores 0.56 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Marines scores 1.38 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.12 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amagaju 26%, Marines 59%. Over 2.5: Amagaju 21%, Marines 44%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Marines has higher xG: 1.16 vs 0.96. Amagaju: 5.9 shots per match, Marines: 6.9.

Match halves

Amagaju: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.26. Marines: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Amagaju: 31-45+ (5 goals). Marines: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.12 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Amagaju is in catastrophic form, sitting in 17th place in the table with just 3 wins in the season and zero wins in the last 5 matches. The hosts have not scored a goal in the last 5 meetings and have a mere 0% win rate at home this season, with 75% losses at their own stadium. Marines, despite unstable form recently, present significantly better offensive statistics with 19 goals in the season and a 33% win rate in away games. The guests have a three times higher shot conversion rate (12% vs 4%) and a better average xG (1.41 vs 1.12), which confirms their qualitative advantage. Given Amagaju's drastic weakness, especially in attack, and Marines' relatively solid results on the road, I expect a victory for the guests, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the recent form problems of both teams.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
AmagajuMarines
5Shots8
AmagajuMarines
2Shots on target4
AmagajuMarines
0.83xG1.21
AmagajuMarines
3Corners6
AmagajuMarines
50Dangerous attacks58
AmagajuMarines
-1Fouls-1
AmagajuMarines
-1Cards-1
AmagajuMarines

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.56Goals scored / match1.38
AmagajuMarines
1.12Goals conceded / match1.26
AmagajuMarines
46%Average possession44%
AmagajuMarines
1.62Shots on target / match2.85
AmagajuMarines

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.94Shots per match6.94
AmagajuMarines
1.62Shots on target2.85
AmagajuMarines
9.4%Shot conversion19.9%
AmagajuMarines
46%Possession44%
AmagajuMarines
0.96xG for1.16
AmagajuMarines
0.98xG against1.18
AmagajuMarines

Shooting quality

Amagaju: BalancedMarines: Counter-attacking
AmagajuMarines
Accuracy (shots on target)27%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amagaju
LWWLD
Season result split
26% W24% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-11
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Marines
WLLDW
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Marines is 146% better for: goals scored per match.

0.56 goals / match - Amagaju · 1.38 goals / match - Marines

Amagaju is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.12 goals / match - Amagaju · 1.26 goals / match - Marines

Amagaju scoring profile: mixed

Amagaju scores in 41% of matches (14 of 34 matches), while Marines keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

Marines scoring profile: very strong

Marines scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Amagaju keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

19Goals scored (season)47
AmagajuMarines
38Goals conceded (season)43
AmagajuMarines
1.68Average goals in match2.65
AmagajuMarines
3Goals scored (last 5)11
AmagajuMarines
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
AmagajuMarines

How often they score at least...

41%1 goal82%
AmagajuMarines
15%2 goals41%
AmagajuMarines
0%3 goals12%
AmagajuMarines
0%4 goals3%
AmagajuMarines

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal76%
AmagajuMarines
24%2 goals35%
AmagajuMarines
3%3 goals9%
AmagajuMarines
3%4 goals3%
AmagajuMarines

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time24%
AmagajuMarines
0%BTTS in both halves9%
AmagajuMarines
9%Scored in both halves24%
AmagajuMarines

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
AmagajuMarines
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
AmagajuMarines
20%BTTS - last 580%
AmagajuMarines

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
AmagajuMarines
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
AmagajuMarines
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
AmagajuMarines

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
AmagajuMarines
12%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
AmagajuMarines
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
AmagajuMarines

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Marines is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - Amagaju · 1.68 pts / match - Marines

Amagaju - half-time state
12% leading56% draw32% trailing
Marines - half-time state
44% leading35% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.68
AmagajuMarines
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.85
AmagajuMarines
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AmagajuMarines
0.91Average goals (1st half)1.35
AmagajuMarines
53%Clean sheet before half-time56%
AmagajuMarines
74%No goal before half-time38%
AmagajuMarines

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.09
AmagajuMarines
0.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
AmagajuMarines
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
AmagajuMarines
0.76Average goals (2nd half)1.29
AmagajuMarines
62%Clean sheet after half-time47%
AmagajuMarines
76%No goal after half-time56%
AmagajuMarines

Amagaju - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Marines - second-half results

24% W38% R38% P
57
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amagaju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Marines - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.21.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amagaju
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
3
9
16-30
5
6
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Marines
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
8
6
16-30
16
9
31-45
2
8
46-60
7
8
61-75
9
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amagaju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+14.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Marines

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

AmagajuLigaMarines
Average goals in match 1.682.12 2.65
Both teams scored 26%46% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 21%38% 44%
Clean sheets 29%34% 24%
Goal before half-time 59%61% 82%
Goal after half-time 56%70% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.12
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Amagaju 0 - 0 - 1 Marines. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Amagaju vs Marines?

The National Soccer League match finished Amagaju 1:1 Marines. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amagaju vs Marines?

Amagaju score 0.56 goals per game on average and Marines 1.38. The National Soccer League average is 2.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Amagaju's matches and 59% of Marines's.

What form are Amagaju and Marines in?

Over the last 5 games Amagaju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Marines 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amagaju vs Marines?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Amagaju vs Marines: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.