Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueNyagisenyi StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Amagaju vs Muhanga: match statistics

Amagaju crest
Amagaju
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Muhanga crest
Muhanga

Amagaju vs Muhanga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amagaju play Muhanga in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match date is 22 May 2026 at 02:00. Venue: Nyagisenyi Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Amagaju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Muhanga: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amagaju scores 0.56 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Muhanga scores 0.74 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.12 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amagaju 26%, Muhanga 35%. Over 2.5: Amagaju 21%, Muhanga 35%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Muhanga has higher xG: 0.99 vs 0.96. Amagaju: 5.9 shots per match, Muhanga: 5.6.

Match halves

Amagaju: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.26. Muhanga: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.26.

Goals by minute

Amagaju: 31-45+ (5 goals). Muhanga: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.12 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Amagaju has a small but meaningful defensive edge: the hosts concede on average 1.25 goals at home versus 1.60 conceded by Muhanga away, and average xG against is 0.96 vs 1.45 (difference 0.49 xG), indicating a more stable Amagaju defense. Offensive differences are minimal – Amagaju registers xG for 1.10 versus Muhanga’s 1.07 and scores on average 0.56 goals per home match versus 0.53 for the visitors away, with the hosts failing to score in 56% of home matches and the visitors in 60% of away matches. Muhanga, however, has more shots on target per match (2.46 vs 1.93) and slightly higher conversion rate (9% vs 8%), which together with the visitors’ lower average possession (46% vs 50%) suggests the away side play more directly and are more dangerous on quick transitions. Both teams have similar form (last 5: both 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses and 1.4 points on average), a low number of clean sheets (13% each) and poor finishing, so I expect a low-scoring, tight game. Considering the hosts’ better defense and marginal advantages in xG and possession, I tip Amagaju to win; proposed probability distribution is Home 48%, Draw 30%, Away 22%.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
AmagajuMuhanga
3Shots2
AmagajuMuhanga
1Shots on target2
AmagajuMuhanga
0.69xG0.55
AmagajuMuhanga
5Corners2
AmagajuMuhanga
57Dangerous attacks35
AmagajuMuhanga
9Fouls23
AmagajuMuhanga
0Cards0
AmagajuMuhanga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.56Goals scored / match0.74
AmagajuMuhanga
1.12Goals conceded / match1.32
AmagajuMuhanga
46%Average possession45%
AmagajuMuhanga
1.62Shots on target / match1.82
AmagajuMuhanga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.94Shots per match5.56
AmagajuMuhanga
1.62Shots on target1.82
AmagajuMuhanga
9.4%Shot conversion13.2%
AmagajuMuhanga
46%Possession45%
AmagajuMuhanga
0.96xG for0.99
AmagajuMuhanga
0.98xG against1.26
AmagajuMuhanga

Shooting quality

Amagaju: BalancedMuhanga: Counter-attacking
AmagajuMuhanga
Accuracy (shots on target)27%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amagaju
LWWLD
Season result split
26% W24% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-11
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Muhanga
WLDWL
Season result split
26% W18% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-19
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-11
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Muhanga is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

0.56 goals / match - Amagaju · 0.74 goals / match - Muhanga

Amagaju is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.12 goals / match - Amagaju · 1.32 goals / match - Muhanga

Amagaju scoring profile: mixed

Amagaju scores in 41% of matches (14 of 34 matches), while Muhanga keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

Muhanga scoring profile: mixed

Muhanga scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Amagaju keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

19Goals scored (season)25
AmagajuMuhanga
38Goals conceded (season)45
AmagajuMuhanga
1.68Average goals in match2.06
AmagajuMuhanga
3Goals scored (last 5)6
AmagajuMuhanga
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
AmagajuMuhanga

How often they score at least...

41%1 goal53%
AmagajuMuhanga
15%2 goals21%
AmagajuMuhanga
0%3 goals0%
AmagajuMuhanga
0%4 goals0%
AmagajuMuhanga

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal76%
AmagajuMuhanga
24%2 goals41%
AmagajuMuhanga
3%3 goals15%
AmagajuMuhanga
3%4 goals0%
AmagajuMuhanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time18%
AmagajuMuhanga
0%BTTS in both halves9%
AmagajuMuhanga
9%Scored in both halves15%
AmagajuMuhanga

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
AmagajuMuhanga
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
AmagajuMuhanga
20%BTTS - last 540%
AmagajuMuhanga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
AmagajuMuhanga
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
AmagajuMuhanga
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
AmagajuMuhanga

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
AmagajuMuhanga
12%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
AmagajuMuhanga
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
AmagajuMuhanga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Muhanga is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - Amagaju · 1.15 pts / match - Muhanga

Amagaju - half-time state
12% leading56% draw32% trailing
Muhanga - half-time state
26% leading35% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.15
AmagajuMuhanga
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.47
AmagajuMuhanga
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
AmagajuMuhanga
0.91Average goals (1st half)1.09
AmagajuMuhanga
53%Clean sheet before half-time53%
AmagajuMuhanga
74%No goal before half-time59%
AmagajuMuhanga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)0.79
AmagajuMuhanga
0.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.26
AmagajuMuhanga
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
AmagajuMuhanga
0.76Average goals (2nd half)0.97
AmagajuMuhanga
62%Clean sheet after half-time47%
AmagajuMuhanga
76%No goal after half-time74%
AmagajuMuhanga

Amagaju - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Muhanga - second-half results

9% W53% R38% P
39
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amagaju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Muhanga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amagaju
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
3
9
16-30
5
6
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Muhanga
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
7
10
16-30
5
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
8
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
28%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amagaju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+14.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Muhanga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

AmagajuLigaMuhanga
Average goals in match 1.682.12 2.06
Both teams scored 26%46% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 21%38% 35%
Clean sheets 29%34% 24%
Goal before half-time 59%61% 71%
Goal after half-time 56%70% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.12
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Amagaju 1 - 0 - 0 Muhanga. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Amagaju vs Muhanga?

The National Soccer League match finished Amagaju 0:2 Muhanga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amagaju vs Muhanga?

Amagaju score 0.56 goals per game on average and Muhanga 0.74. The National Soccer League average is 2.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Amagaju's matches and 35% of Muhanga's.

What form are Amagaju and Muhanga in?

Over the last 5 games Amagaju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Muhanga 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amagaju vs Muhanga?

The statistical background for Amagaju vs Muhanga — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.