Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Amagaju vs Police: match statistics

Amagaju crest
Amagaju
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Police crest
Police

Amagaju vs Police: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amagaju played Police in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Amagaju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Police: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amagaju scores 0.48 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Police scores 0.88 and concedes 0.56. League average: 2.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amagaju 28%, Police 36%. Over 2.5: Amagaju 20%, Police 20%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Police has higher xG: 1.14 vs 0.91. Amagaju: 5.2 shots per match, Police: 6.3.

Match halves

Amagaju: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.24. Police: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

Amagaju: 61-75 (3 goals). Police: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.07 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Police are the match favourites, supported by season-long metrics: Police sit 4th with a record of 10-10-5, while Amagaju are 17th at 5-6-14. Police’s biggest advantage is their defence — on the road they concede only 0.42 goals per game and have 58% clean sheets, whereas Amagaju concede 1.33 goals at home and record just 8% clean sheets. Additionally, Police have 22 goals scored this season versus Amagaju’s 12, register more shots on target (2.5 vs 1.91) and maintain higher possession (56% vs 50%), translating to superior game control. The last 5 matches show Amagaju at 2-1-2 with 4 goals (PPG 1.4) and Police at 1-2-2 with 3 goals (PPG 1.0), so short-term form is balanced, but Police’s defensive edge and season-long performance give them the higher probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In my assessment the "no" scenario predominates, as Police have very low scoring efficiency (seasonScoredAVG_away = 0.58) and a high clean sheet rate (seasonCSPercentage_away = 58%), and their season BTTS share is only 25%. Although Amagaju shows better attacking metrics (seasonScoredAVG_home = 1.15, xG_for_avg_home = 1.21, conversion rate 17%) and averages 2.92 shots on target per match, their season BTTS is 46% and does not guarantee a Goal/Goal outcome. Additionally, the league posts BTTS at 46% with as many as 67% of matches featuring a clean sheet (league_seasonCSPercentage = 67%), which overall favors No Goal outcomes. In the last 5 meetings both teams have a 40% BTTS involvement and average goals of 0.8 (Amagaju) and 0.6 (Police), therefore I estimate 30% for BTTS - Yes and 70% for BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals based on xG are approximately 1.03 for Amagaju (xG attack 1.21 vs xG conceded 0.86 → (1.21+0.86)/2≈1.03) and 0.99 for Police (1.04 vs 0.93 → (1.04+0.93)/2≈0.99), totaling 2.02 expected goals. Both teams rarely produce high-scoring games: the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals is 23% for Amagaju and 17% for Police, while the league average is 35%; in the last 5 matches Amagaju over2.5 is 40% and Police 20%. A probabilistic model with 2.02 goals yields about a 60% chance for Over 1.5, 33% for Over 2.5 and 15% for Over 3.5, which aligns with the low shares of >2.5 matches for both sides. Additionally, Police keep clean sheets in 58% of matches and score on average only 0.58 goals with an xG of 1.04 (shot conversion 10%), while Amagaju has higher efficiency (conversion 17%) but not enough to materially lift the combined total. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Under 2.5 (estimated 67% probability), while Over 1.5 remains moderately likely (60%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-Time statistics strongly indicate a draw: Amagaju were level at the break in 62% of matches, while clean sheets at half-time stand at 85% for the home side and 92% for Police; average goals by half are only 0.46 (Amagaju) and 0.42 (Police), with average goals conceded 0.15 and 0.08. After the break the advantage shifts to the home team — average second-half goals for Amagaju are 1.23 versus 0.50 for Police, and Amagaju score on average 0.69 goals after the break vs 0.17 for the visitors, which increases the hosts’ likelihood of deciding the match in the second half. Over full matches Amagaju average 1.15 goals (xG 1.21) compared to 0.58 (xG 1.04) for Police, and Amagaju win 46% of games versus 33% for Police, giving the home side the final advantage. Therefore the best signal is a Half-Time draw and an Amagaju victory Full-Time (X/1) — I assign this scenario a 41% probability; alternatives are 1/1 (20%) and X/X (15%), with the remaining combinations sharing the rest. Combinations starting with ‘2’ total only 8% probability, since Police record poor numbers after the break (an average of 0.17 goals) and weaker second-half performance.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
AmagajuPolice
10Shots3
AmagajuPolice
2Shots on target1
AmagajuPolice
1.14xG0.82
AmagajuPolice
5Corners6
AmagajuPolice
50Dangerous attacks75
AmagajuPolice
-1Fouls-1
AmagajuPolice
-1Cards-1
AmagajuPolice

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.48Goals scored / match0.88
AmagajuPolice
1.24Goals conceded / match0.56
AmagajuPolice
44%Average possession51%
AmagajuPolice
1.32Shots on target / match2.44
AmagajuPolice

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.2Shots per match6.28
AmagajuPolice
1.32Shots on target2.44
AmagajuPolice
9.2%Shot conversion14%
AmagajuPolice
44%Possession51%
AmagajuPolice
0.91xG for1.14
AmagajuPolice
1xG against0.9
AmagajuPolice

Shooting quality

Amagaju: BalancedPolice: Efficient finishing
AmagajuPolice
Accuracy (shots on target)25%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amagaju is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Amagaju · 1 pts / match - Police

Amagaju
WDWLL
Season result split
20% W24% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-14
0.84 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-8
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Police
DLLWD
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-5
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.76Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Police is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

0.48 goals / match - Amagaju · 0.88 goals / match - Police

Police is 121% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Amagaju · 0.56 goals / match - Police

Amagaju scoring profile: more difficult

Amagaju scores in 40% of matches (10 of 25 matches), while Police keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 matches).

Police scoring profile: strong

Police scores in 60% of matches (15 of 25 matches), while Amagaju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

12Goals scored (season)22
AmagajuPolice
31Goals conceded (season)14
AmagajuPolice
1.72Average goals in match1.44
AmagajuPolice
4Goals scored (last 5)3
AmagajuPolice
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
AmagajuPolice

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal60%
AmagajuPolice
8%2 goals20%
AmagajuPolice
0%3 goals4%
AmagajuPolice
0%4 goals4%
AmagajuPolice

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal56%
AmagajuPolice
24%2 goals0%
AmagajuPolice
4%3 goals0%
AmagajuPolice
4%4 goals0%
AmagajuPolice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time4%
AmagajuPolice
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AmagajuPolice
8%Scored in both halves20%
AmagajuPolice

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
AmagajuPolice
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
AmagajuPolice
40%BTTS - last 540%
AmagajuPolice

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time48%
AmagajuPolice
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
AmagajuPolice
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AmagajuPolice

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
AmagajuPolice
12%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
AmagajuPolice
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AmagajuPolice

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Police is 105% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Amagaju · 1.64 pts / match - Police

Amagaju - half-time state
8% leading56% draw36% trailing
Police - half-time state
36% leading56% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.64
AmagajuPolice
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.44
AmagajuPolice
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.12
AmagajuPolice
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.56
AmagajuPolice
48%Clean sheet before half-time88%
AmagajuPolice
76%No goal before half-time60%
AmagajuPolice

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.2
AmagajuPolice
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
AmagajuPolice
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
AmagajuPolice
0.8Average goals (2nd half)0.88
AmagajuPolice
60%Clean sheet after half-time56%
AmagajuPolice
76%No goal after half-time60%
AmagajuPolice

Amagaju - second-half results

20% W44% R36% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding250%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Police - second-half results

24% W48% R28% P
41
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amagaju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Police - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amagaju
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
7
16-30
2
4
31-45
0
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Police
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
2
16-30
2
0
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amagaju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
44%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Police

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
51%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

AmagajuLigaPolice
Average goals in match 1.722.07 1.44
Both teams scored 28%45% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%35% 20%
Clean sheets 24%34% 44%
Goal before half-time 60%62% 48%
Goal after half-time 60%70% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.07
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.10
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Amagaju 0 - 0 - 1 Police. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Police
1 : 0
Amagaju

FAQ

What was the result of Amagaju vs Police?

The National Soccer League match finished Amagaju 2:1 Police. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amagaju vs Police?

Amagaju score 0.48 goals per game on average and Police 0.88. The National Soccer League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Amagaju's matches and 36% of Police's.

What form are Amagaju and Police in?

Over the last 5 games Amagaju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Police 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amagaju vs Police?

The statistical background for Amagaju vs Police — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.