Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 02 November 2026

Amal Tiznit vs Kawkab Marrakech: match statistics

Amal Tiznit crest
Amal Tiznit
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Kawkab Marrakech crest
Kawkab Marrakech

Amal Tiznit vs Kawkab Marrakech: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amal Tiznit played Kawkab Marrakech in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Amal Tiznit: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kawkab Marrakech: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amal Tiznit scores 1.20 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Kawkab Marrakech scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.41 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amal Tiznit 80%, Kawkab Marrakech 60%. Over 2.5: Amal Tiznit 60%, Kawkab Marrakech 40%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Amal Tiznit has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.29. Amal Tiznit: 9.0 shots per match, Kawkab Marrakech: 9.4.

Match halves

Amal Tiznit: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.80. Kawkab Marrakech: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Amal Tiznit: 31-45+ (2 goals). Kawkab Marrakech: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kawkab Marrakech sit 2nd and have won 3 of their 5 matches, while 13th-placed Amal Tiznit have managed just one win and suffered 3 defeats over the same period. The hosts have lost all 3 of their home games, conceding an average of 3.33 goals, whereas the visitors have won both away matches without conceding. Even so, Amal create decent chances at home, averaging 1.62 xG compared with Kawkab’s 1.36 on the road, which makes backing an away win less certain. However, the defensive record could prove decisive: Amal have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches, while Kawkab have let in just 5, giving the visitors the better chance of winning.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Amal Tiznit have seen both teams score in 100% of their home matches, while Kawkab Marrakech have not recorded that outcome in any of their away games. However, recent form supports BTTS - Yes: both teams have scored in 80% and 60% of their respective last 5 matches. The hosts conceded an average of 2.2 goals during this period, while the visitors scored 1.4, making a Kawkab goal look likely. Meanwhile, Amal average 1.67 goals at home, and Kawkab’s away xG conceded stands at 1.63, giving the hosts a genuine chance to respond. Kawkab’s away run of clean sheets is a significant argument against BTTS - Yes, but recent results and the number of chances created tip the assessment slightly in favour of BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in Kawkab’s matches, while it has been exceeded in 33% of Amal’s games. The hosts’ data is more attacking—they score and concede an average of 1.67 goals each—but Kawkab score an average of 1.0 goal away from home and have not conceded. However, the picture is not unequivocally defensive, as Amal have conceded an average of 2.2 goals over their last five matches, while the teams’ xG figures are 1.25 and 1.36, respectively. Therefore, the prediction of 2.35 goals points to a greater likelihood of a match with no more than three goals, but offers weaker support for Under 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal in favour of Kawkab Marrakech leading at the break comes from the last five matches: the visitors led at half-time in three of them, while Amal Tiznit did not do so once. Over this period, Kawkab averaged 0.8 goals before the break compared with 0.4 for the hosts, and won three matches overall, while Amal won just once. The case for Kawkab holding on to their lead is also supported by Amal conceding an average of 1.33 goals after half-time in home matches, whereas Kawkab conceded none in either of their two away games. The 2/2 pick is not without risk, however: the hosts led at half-time in two of their three home matches, making a draw at the break followed by an away win a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
11Shots11
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
4Shots on target4
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1.66xG1.44
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
5Corners5
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
94Dangerous attacks64
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
7Fouls10
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1Cards6
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1.2Goals scored / match1.4
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
2.2Goals conceded / match1
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
48%Average possession46%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
4.8Shots on target / match4.8
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9Shots per match9.4
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
4.8Shots on target4.8
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
13.3%Shot conversion14.9%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
48%Possession46%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1.31xG for1.29
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1.47xG against1.34
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

Shooting quality

Amal Tiznit: Efficient finishingKawkab Marrakech: Counter-attacking
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
Accuracy (shots on target)53%51%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kawkab Marrakech is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Amal Tiznit · 2 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech

Amal Tiznit
LWLDL
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Kawkab Marrakech
LWWWD
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kawkab Marrakech is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Amal Tiznit · 1.4 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech

Kawkab Marrakech is 120% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.2 goals / match - Amal Tiznit · 1 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech

Amal Tiznit scoring profile: very strong

Amal Tiznit scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Kawkab Marrakech scoring profile: very strong

Kawkab Marrakech scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Amal Tiznit keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)7
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
11Goals conceded (season)5
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
3.4Average goals in match2.4
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%2 goals40%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
0%3 goals0%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
0%4 goals0%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
60%2 goals20%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
40%3 goals20%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%4 goals0%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time20%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%BTTS in both halves20%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%Scored in both halves40%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
80%BTTS - last 560%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kawkab Marrakech is 267% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.6 pts / match - Amal Tiznit · 2.2 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech

Amal Tiznit - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing
Kawkab Marrakech - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.6Points per match (1st half)2.2
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1.4Average goals (1st half)1
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
40%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
60%No goal before half-time20%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
2Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech
20%No goal after half-time40%
Amal TiznitKawkab Marrakech

Amal Tiznit - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amal Tiznit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kawkab Marrakech - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amal Tiznit
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kawkab Marrakech
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amal Tiznit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Kawkab Marrakech

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Amal TiznitLigaKawkab Marrakech
Average goals in match▲ 3.402.41• 2.40
Both teams scored▲ 80%54%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%41%• 40%
Clean sheets▼ 20%31%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time• 60%59%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%72%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.00
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+-29%
Home attack advantage
+-41%
Home defence advantage
+-18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardAbdallah Haimoud
  2. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardAyoub Maamouri
  3. Amal TiznitYellow cardSaliu Popoola Sodiq
  4. Kawkab MarrakechGoalJawad GhabraAssist: Youssef Raiani
  5. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardJawad Ghabra
  6. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardMohamed Dadssi
  7. Amal TiznitSubstitutionOn: Mouad GoullousOff: Ayoub Adila

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Amal Tiznit vs Kawkab Marrakech?

The Botola Pro match finished Amal Tiznit 0:1 Kawkab Marrakech. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amal Tiznit vs Kawkab Marrakech?

Amal Tiznit score 1.20 goals per game on average and Kawkab Marrakech 1.40. The Botola Pro average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Amal Tiznit's matches and 60% of Kawkab Marrakech's.

What form are Amal Tiznit and Kawkab Marrakech in?

Over the last 5 games Amal Tiznit have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kawkab Marrakech 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amal Tiznit vs Kawkab Marrakech?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.