Amed vs Bandırmaspor: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amed play Bandırmaspor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 13 December 2025 at 17:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Bandırmaspor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Bandırmaspor scores 1.24 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amed 55%, Bandırmaspor 39%. Over 2.5: Amed 58%, Bandırmaspor 34%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.20. Amed: 15.5 shots per match, Bandırmaspor: 10.6.

Match halves

Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16. Bandırmaspor: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). Bandırmaspor: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
AmedBandırmaspor
17Shots15
AmedBandırmaspor
5Shots on target8
AmedBandırmaspor
1.71xG1.7
AmedBandırmaspor
3Corners5
AmedBandırmaspor
39Dangerous attacks26
AmedBandırmaspor
11Fouls7
AmedBandırmaspor
1Cards0
AmedBandırmaspor

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.13Goals scored / match1.24
AmedBandırmaspor
1.11Goals conceded / match0.89
AmedBandırmaspor
53%Average possession45%
AmedBandırmaspor
5.61Shots on target / match3.76
AmedBandırmaspor

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match10.63
AmedBandırmaspor
5.61Shots on target3.76
AmedBandırmaspor
13.8%Shot conversion11.6%
AmedBandırmaspor
53%Possession45%
AmedBandırmaspor
1.71xG for1.2
AmedBandırmaspor
1.15xG against1.37
AmedBandırmaspor

Shooting quality

Amed: AttackingBandırmaspor: Balanced
AmedBandırmaspor
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bandırmaspor is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Amed · 1.8 pts / match - Bandırmaspor

Amed
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W29% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-11-6
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
14-5-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Bandırmaspor
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W32% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-10
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-7
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 72% better for: goals scored per match.

2.13 goals / match - Amed · 1.24 goals / match - Bandırmaspor

Bandırmaspor is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Amed · 0.89 goals / match - Bandırmaspor

Amed scoring profile: strong

Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Bandırmaspor keeps a clean sheet in 45% (17 of 38 matches).

Bandırmaspor scoring profile: strong

Bandırmaspor scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

81Goals scored (season)47
AmedBandırmaspor
42Goals conceded (season)34
AmedBandırmaspor
3.24Average goals in match2.13
AmedBandırmaspor
7Goals scored (last 5)4
AmedBandırmaspor
9Goals conceded (last 5)1
AmedBandırmaspor

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal71%
AmedBandırmaspor
58%2 goals32%
AmedBandırmaspor
29%3 goals13%
AmedBandırmaspor
18%4 goals8%
AmedBandırmaspor

How often they concede at least...

66%1 goal55%
AmedBandırmaspor
32%2 goals21%
AmedBandırmaspor
11%3 goals11%
AmedBandırmaspor
3%4 goals3%
AmedBandırmaspor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time13%
AmedBandırmaspor
11%BTTS in both halves0%
AmedBandırmaspor
37%Scored in both halves24%
AmedBandırmaspor

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
AmedBandırmaspor
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
AmedBandırmaspor
80%BTTS - last 520%
AmedBandırmaspor

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
AmedBandırmaspor
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
AmedBandırmaspor
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AmedBandırmaspor

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
AmedBandırmaspor
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
AmedBandırmaspor
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
AmedBandırmaspor

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - Amed · 1.45 pts / match - Bandırmaspor

Amed - half-time state
42% leading45% draw13% trailing
Bandırmaspor - half-time state
32% leading50% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.45
AmedBandırmaspor
0.97Goals scored (1st half)0.53
AmedBandırmaspor
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
AmedBandırmaspor
1.45Average goals (1st half)0.92
AmedBandırmaspor
63%Clean sheet before half-time68%
AmedBandırmaspor
42%No goal before half-time55%
AmedBandırmaspor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1.5
AmedBandırmaspor
1.16Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
AmedBandırmaspor
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
AmedBandırmaspor
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.21
AmedBandırmaspor
53%Clean sheet after half-time66%
AmedBandırmaspor
37%No goal after half-time50%
AmedBandırmaspor

Amed - second-half results

47% W29% R24% P
65
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bandırmaspor - second-half results

37% W39% R24% P
55
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Bandırmaspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
12
7
16-30
18
8
31-45
16
2
46-60
9
9
61-75
19
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Bandırmaspor
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
10
10
31-45
10
4
46-60
8
8
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Bandırmaspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaBandırmaspor
Average goals in match 3.242.92 2.13
Both teams scored 55%50% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%54% 34%
Clean sheets 34%29% 45%
Goal before half-time 68%71% 63%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Amed 0 - 0 - 1 Bandırmaspor. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs Bandırmaspor?

The 1. Lig match finished Amed 2:1 Bandırmaspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Bandırmaspor?

Amed score 2.13 goals per game on average and Bandırmaspor 1.24. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Amed's matches and 39% of Bandırmaspor's.

What form are Amed and Bandırmaspor in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Bandırmaspor 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Bandırmaspor?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.