Amed vs Bandırmaspor: match statistics
Amed vs Bandırmaspor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Amed played Bandırmaspor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 13 December 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Amed: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Bandırmaspor: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Amed scores 2.31 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Bandırmaspor scores 1.25 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Amed 69%, Bandırmaspor 44%. Over 2.5: Amed 81%, Bandırmaspor 31%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.19. Amed: 15.9 shots per match, Bandırmaspor: 10.9.
Match halves
Amed: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.31. Bandırmaspor: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Amed: 76-90+ (11 goals). Bandırmaspor: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | Bandırmaspor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Amed is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Amed · 2 pts / match - Bandırmaspor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 85% better for: goals scored per match.
2.31 goals / match - Amed · 1.25 goals / match - Bandırmaspor
Bandırmaspor is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Amed · 0.88 goals / match - Bandırmaspor
Amed scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Bandırmaspor keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
Bandırmaspor scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Amed
Over / Under - Bandırmaspor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Amed · 1.44 pts / match - Bandırmaspor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Bandırmaspor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Amed
Bandırmaspor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | Bandırmaspor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.81 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 81% | 57% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs Bandırmaspor?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 2:1 Bandırmaspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Bandırmaspor?
Amed score 2.31 goals per game on average and Bandırmaspor 1.25. The 1. Lig average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Amed's matches and 44% of Bandırmaspor's.
What form are Amed and Bandırmaspor in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Bandırmaspor 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Bandırmaspor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.