Amed vs Erokspor: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amed played Erokspor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 28 November 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Amed: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Erokspor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amed scores 2.21 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Erokspor scores 2.43 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amed 64%, Erokspor 64%. Over 2.5: Amed 79%, Erokspor 64%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.30. Amed: 15.7 shots per match, Erokspor: 11.2.

Match halves

Amed: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.21. Erokspor: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.57.

Goals by minute

Amed: 76-90+ (8 goals). Erokspor: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
AmedErokspor
17Shots6
AmedErokspor
4Shots on target3
AmedErokspor
1.83xG0.77
AmedErokspor
7Corners3
AmedErokspor
67Dangerous attacks24
AmedErokspor
12Fouls10
AmedErokspor
4Cards2
AmedErokspor

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.21Goals scored / match2.43
AmedErokspor
1.43Goals conceded / match1.07
AmedErokspor
54%Average possession55%
AmedErokspor
5.64Shots on target / match4.43
AmedErokspor

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.71Shots per match11.21
AmedErokspor
5.64Shots on target4.43
AmedErokspor
14.1%Shot conversion21.7%
AmedErokspor
54%Possession55%
AmedErokspor
1.69xG for1.3
AmedErokspor
1.22xG against0.97
AmedErokspor

Shooting quality

Amed: AttackingErokspor: Efficient finishing
AmedErokspor
Accuracy (shots on target)36%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.55

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Amed · 1.8 pts / match - Erokspor

Amed
WDWWL
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Erokspor
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
57% W29% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Erokspor is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

2.21 goals / match - Amed · 2.43 goals / match - Erokspor

Erokspor is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - Amed · 1.07 goals / match - Erokspor

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Erokspor keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Erokspor scoring profile: very strong

Erokspor scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

31Goals scored (season)34
AmedErokspor
20Goals conceded (season)15
AmedErokspor
3.64Average goals in match3.5
AmedErokspor
8Goals scored (last 5)7
AmedErokspor
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
AmedErokspor

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal86%
AmedErokspor
64%2 goals71%
AmedErokspor
29%3 goals43%
AmedErokspor
21%4 goals29%
AmedErokspor

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal71%
AmedErokspor
43%2 goals21%
AmedErokspor
14%3 goals14%
AmedErokspor
7%4 goals0%
AmedErokspor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time36%
AmedErokspor
7%BTTS in both halves14%
AmedErokspor
43%Scored in both halves57%
AmedErokspor

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
AmedErokspor
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
AmedErokspor
60%BTTS - last 580%
AmedErokspor

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
AmedErokspor
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
AmedErokspor
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
AmedErokspor

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
AmedErokspor
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
AmedErokspor
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
AmedErokspor

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.57 pts / match - Amed · 1.43 pts / match - Erokspor

Amed - half-time state
36% leading50% draw14% trailing
Erokspor - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)1.43
AmedErokspor
1Goals scored (1st half)0.86
AmedErokspor
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AmedErokspor
1.71Average goals (1st half)1.36
AmedErokspor
50%Clean sheet before half-time64%
AmedErokspor
36%No goal before half-time36%
AmedErokspor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.64Points per match (2nd half)2
AmedErokspor
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)1.57
AmedErokspor
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
AmedErokspor
1.93Average goals (2nd half)2.14
AmedErokspor
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AmedErokspor
43%No goal after half-time21%
AmedErokspor

Amed - second-half results

43% W36% R21% P
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Erokspor - second-half results

57% W29% R14% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding197%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Erokspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amed
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
0
46-60
4
4
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Erokspor
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
1
31-45
5
5
46-60
9
2
61-75
8
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.57
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Erokspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
190%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaErokspor
Average goals in match 3.642.95 3.50
Both teams scored 64%56% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 79%56% 64%
Clean sheets 21%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%70% 64%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EroksporGoalMikail OkyarAssist: Hamza Čataković
  2. EroksporSubstitutionOn: Mame Mor FayeOff: Hamza Čataković
  3. EroksporSubstitutionOn: Alper KaramanOff: Recep Niyaz
  4. AmedYellow cardHasan Ali Kaldırım
  5. AmedYellow cardMehmet Yeşil
  6. EroksporSubstitutionOn: Altar Han HidayetoğluOff: Berat Luş
  7. EroksporSubstitutionOn: Muhammet Harun GençOff: Olarenwaju Ayoba Kayode
  8. EroksporSubstitutionOn: Ryan JackOff: Tugay Kaçar
  9. EroksporYellow cardMikail Okyar
  10. EroksporYellow cardFrancis Beny Nzaba
  11. AmedGoalMbaye Diagne
  12. AmedYellow cardErce Kardeşler

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs Erokspor?

The 1. Lig match finished Amed 2:1 Erokspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Erokspor?

Amed score 2.21 goals per game on average and Erokspor 2.43. The 1. Lig average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Amed's matches and 64% of Erokspor's.

What form are Amed and Erokspor in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Erokspor 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Erokspor?

The statistical background for Amed vs Erokspor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.