Türkiye - Süper LigSeyrantepe Spor Kompleksi Stadyumu 1Data current as of 19 September 2026

Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir: match statistics

Amed crest
Amed
5 : 0half-time 1:0
İstanbul Başakşehir crest
İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amed played İstanbul Başakşehir in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Seyrantepe Spor Kompleksi Stadyumu 1. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Amed: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match. İstanbul Başakşehir: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amed scores 1.75 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. İstanbul Başakşehir scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amed 50%, İstanbul Başakşehir 75%. Over 2.5: Amed 75%, İstanbul Başakşehir 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.39. Amed: 14.0 shots per match, İstanbul Başakşehir: 13.3.

Match halves

Amed: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. İstanbul Başakşehir: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Amed: 46-60 (2 goals). İstanbul Başakşehir: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Süper Lig: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed are clearly more effective at home, averaging 2.5 goals per match from 15 shots and 6 shots on target, while İstanbul Başakşehir score just 1 goal away from home. The hosts have won both of their home matches so far, whereas the visitors have lost every away fixture, conceding as many as 2 goals per game on average. The difference in the quality of chances created is reflected in Amed’s xG of 1.58 compared with the visitors’ 1.30, while Başakşehir allow opponents an average xG of 2.00. Amed also have the more solid home defence, conceding 0.5 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of fixtures, while the visitors have yet to record an away match without conceding. Recent form also favours the hosts, who have scored 10 goals in their last five matches, while Başakşehir have won just 1 of their last 5 games.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear: Amed recorded BTTS in 67% of matches, while İstanbul Başakşehir did so in as many as 100%, compared with the league average of 53%. The visitors have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.00 goals per match, which aligns well with Amed’s average of 1.67 goals and 1.41 xG per game. Başakşehir score an average of 1.00 goal but register 4.00 shots on target per match, while the hosts have conceded 1.60 goals per game over their last five appearances. Both teams have scored in every match this season, as their percentage of games without scoring stands at 0%, reducing the risk of a BTTS No scenario. BTTS landed for both sides in 60% of their last five matches, making goals at both ends the most likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Amed averages 1.67 goals at home, while Başakşehir concedes as many as 2.00 goals per away match, clearly strengthening the outlook for the home side to score. In their last five matches, Amed averaged 2.0 goals scored, while both teams conceded 1.6 goals per game during this period. Each team has exceeded the 1.5-goal threshold in league matches in 100% of cases so far, and the visitors have kept no clean sheets. The creative potential also points towards goals: average xG stands at 1.35 for Amed and 1.39 for Başakşehir. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as the data strongly supports at least two goals, while the 2.5 and 3.5 lines carry greater risk.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Amed have a clear advantage in their home results: they average 1.67 goals, while İstanbul Başakşehir concede as many as 2.00 goals away from home and have lost all of their matches so far. The hosts led at the break in 2 of their 3 home games, while the visitors have yet to go into half-time ahead; additionally, the away side have failed to keep a clean sheet. Amed’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with an average xG of 1.41 compared with Başakşehir’s 2.00 xGA. In their last five matches, Amed have scored an average of 1.4 goals after the break and won the second half in 60% of cases, whereas the visitors have lost the second half in 60% of their matches. The most likely scenario, therefore, is for the hosts to take the lead before half-time and hold on to it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
22Shots7
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
6Shots on target1
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
2.11xG0.83
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
3Corners3
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
44Dangerous attacks43
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
9Fouls9
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1Cards2
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.75Goals scored / match1.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.25Goals conceded / match1.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Average possession53%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
4.25Shots on target / match3.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match13.25
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
4.25Shots on target3.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
12.5%Shot conversion11.3%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Possession53%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.43xG for1.39
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.14xG against1.4
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Shooting quality

Amed: Attackingİstanbul Başakşehir: Balanced
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
Accuracy (shots on target)30%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.75 pts / match - Amed · 1 pts / match - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed
WLWD
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%
İstanbul Başakşehir
WLDL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Amed · 1.5 goals / match - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Amed · 1.5 goals / match - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while İstanbul Başakşehir keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

İstanbul Başakşehir scoring profile: very strong

İstanbul Başakşehir scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
5Goals conceded (season)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
3Average goals in match3
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
75%2 goals50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%3 goals0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%4 goals0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%2 goals50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%3 goals25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%4 goals0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

75%
İstanbul Başakşehir - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 4 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Scored in both halves25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%BTTS - last 575%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

İstanbul Başakşehir is 250% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Amed · 1.75 pts / match - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
İstanbul Başakşehir - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1Average goals (1st half)1.25
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
75%No goal before half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per match (2nd half)1
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
2Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%No goal after half-time50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Amed - second-half results

75% W0% D25% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

İstanbul Başakşehir - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.502.25
Goals scored / match0.31.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 0% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
İstanbul Başakşehir - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.751.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match1.31.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%25%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amed
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

İstanbul Başakşehir
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

İstanbul Başakşehir

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaİstanbul Başakşehir
Average goals in match 3.002.95 3.00
Both teams scored 50%52% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%55% 50%
Clean sheets 25%24% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%81% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. İstanbul BaşakşehirYellow cardChristopher Operi
  2. İstanbul BaşakşehirGoalEmin Bayram
  3. İstanbul BaşakşehirYellow cardUmut Güneş
  4. AmedYellow cardErmal Krasniqi
  5. AmedSubstitutionOn: Amadou CisséOff: Mohamed Khalil
  6. İstanbul BaşakşehirSubstitutionOn: Ivan BrnićOff: Abbosbek Fayzullayev
  7. İstanbul BaşakşehirSubstitutionOn: Berkay ÖzcanOff: Eldor Azamat Shomurodov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir?

The Süper Lig match finished Amed 5:0 İstanbul Başakşehir. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir?

Amed score 1.75 goals per game on average and İstanbul Başakşehir 1.50. The Süper Lig average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Amed's matches and 75% of İstanbul Başakşehir's.

What form are Amed and İstanbul Başakşehir in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and İstanbul Başakşehir 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir?

The statistical background for Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.