Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 23 July 2026

Amed vs Manisa BBSK: match statistics

Amed crest
Amed
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Manisa BBSK crest
Manisa BBSK
165%(1.30)
X22%(4.80)
213%(7.50)

Amed displays impressive home form with an 80% win rate and just 20% draws, remaining unbeaten at home this season. The hosts score an average of 2.27 goals per game while conceding only 0.67, translating into a +24 goal difference in home fixtures. Manisa BBSK shows poor away form, winning only 27% of their road games and conceding 1.87 goals on average while scoring just 1.2. The difference in play quality is also evident in xG stats: Amed generates 1.85 xG per home match compared to their opponents' 1.11 xG, while Manisa records xG for and against values of 1.2 and 1.59 respectively on the road. The form over the last five games also favors the hosts (2.2 PPG vs 1.8 for the visitors). Additionally, Amed has a 47% home clean sheet rate, suggesting defensive solidity. All these factors point to a clear advantage for Amed and a high probability of their victory.

Amed vs Manisa BBSK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amed play Manisa BBSK in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Manisa BBSK: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Manisa BBSK scores 1.50 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amed 55%, Manisa BBSK 50%. Over 2.5: Amed 58%, Manisa BBSK 55%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.27. Amed: 15.5 shots per match, Manisa BBSK: 11.1.

Match halves

Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16. Manisa BBSK: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). Manisa BBSK: 61-75 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Amed displays impressive home form with an 80% win rate and just 20% draws, remaining unbeaten at home this season. The hosts score an average of 2.27 goals per game while conceding only 0.67, translating into a +24 goal difference in home fixtures. Manisa BBSK shows poor away form, winning only 27% of their road games and conceding 1.87 goals on average while scoring just 1.2. The difference in play quality is also evident in xG stats: Amed generates 1.85 xG per home match compared to their opponents' 1.11 xG, while Manisa records xG for and against values of 1.2 and 1.59 respectively on the road. The form over the last five games also favors the hosts (2.2 PPG vs 1.8 for the visitors). Additionally, Amed has a 47% home clean sheet rate, suggesting defensive solidity. All these factors point to a clear advantage for Amed and a high probability of their victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
AmedManisa BBSK
23Shots5
AmedManisa BBSK
8Shots on target1
AmedManisa BBSK
2.58xG0.53
AmedManisa BBSK
17Corners2
AmedManisa BBSK
80Dangerous attacks19
AmedManisa BBSK
12Fouls6
AmedManisa BBSK
5Cards4
AmedManisa BBSK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.13Goals scored / match1.5
AmedManisa BBSK
1.11Goals conceded / match1.47
AmedManisa BBSK
53%Average possession46%
AmedManisa BBSK
5.61Shots on target / match4.39
AmedManisa BBSK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match11.08
AmedManisa BBSK
5.61Shots on target4.39
AmedManisa BBSK
13.8%Shot conversion13.5%
AmedManisa BBSK
53%Possession46%
AmedManisa BBSK
1.71xG for1.27
AmedManisa BBSK
1.15xG against1.6
AmedManisa BBSK

Shooting quality

Amed: AttackingManisa BBSK: Counter-attacking
AmedManisa BBSK
Accuracy (shots on target)36%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Manisa BBSK is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Amed · 2.4 pts / match - Manisa BBSK

Amed
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W29% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-11-6
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
14-5-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Manisa BBSK
WWWLW
Season result split
42% W18% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-15
1.45 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-10
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 2.14BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

2.13 goals / match - Amed · 1.5 goals / match - Manisa BBSK

Amed is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Amed · 1.47 goals / match - Manisa BBSK

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Manisa BBSK keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

Manisa BBSK scoring profile: strong

Manisa BBSK scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

81Goals scored (season)57
AmedManisa BBSK
42Goals conceded (season)56
AmedManisa BBSK
3.24Average goals in match2.97
AmedManisa BBSK
7Goals scored (last 5)10
AmedManisa BBSK
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
AmedManisa BBSK

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal76%
AmedManisa BBSK
58%2 goals39%
AmedManisa BBSK
29%3 goals18%
AmedManisa BBSK
18%4 goals11%
AmedManisa BBSK

How often they concede at least...

66%1 goal68%
AmedManisa BBSK
32%2 goals42%
AmedManisa BBSK
11%3 goals18%
AmedManisa BBSK
3%4 goals8%
AmedManisa BBSK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time21%
AmedManisa BBSK
11%BTTS in both halves5%
AmedManisa BBSK
37%Scored in both halves26%
AmedManisa BBSK

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
AmedManisa BBSK
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
AmedManisa BBSK
80%BTTS - last 520%
AmedManisa BBSK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
AmedManisa BBSK
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
AmedManisa BBSK
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AmedManisa BBSK

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
AmedManisa BBSK
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
AmedManisa BBSK
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
AmedManisa BBSK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - Amed · 1.32 pts / match - Manisa BBSK

Amed - half-time state
42% leading45% draw13% trailing
Manisa BBSK - half-time state
29% leading45% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.32
AmedManisa BBSK
0.97Goals scored (1st half)0.63
AmedManisa BBSK
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
AmedManisa BBSK
1.45Average goals (1st half)1.29
AmedManisa BBSK
63%Clean sheet before half-time53%
AmedManisa BBSK
42%No goal before half-time53%
AmedManisa BBSK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1.42
AmedManisa BBSK
1.16Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
AmedManisa BBSK
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
AmedManisa BBSK
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.68
AmedManisa BBSK
53%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AmedManisa BBSK
37%No goal after half-time45%
AmedManisa BBSK

Amed - second-half results

47% W29% R24% P
65
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Manisa BBSK - second-half results

37% W32% R32% P
50
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Manisa BBSK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
12
7
16-30
18
8
31-45
16
2
46-60
9
9
61-75
19
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Manisa BBSK
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
7
11
16-30
8
8
31-45
9
8
46-60
13
8
61-75
11
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Manisa BBSK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.95
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaManisa BBSK
Average goals in match 3.242.92 2.97
Both teams scored 55%50% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%54% 55%
Clean sheets 34%29% 32%
Goal before half-time 68%71% 74%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Amed 1 - 0 - 0 Manisa BBSK. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Manisa Büyükşehir Belediye Spor Kulübü
0 : 3
Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs Manisa BBSK?

The 1. Lig match finished Amed 2:0 Manisa BBSK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Manisa BBSK?

Amed score 2.13 goals per game on average and Manisa BBSK 1.50. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Amed's matches and 50% of Manisa BBSK's.

What form are Amed and Manisa BBSK in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Manisa BBSK 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Manisa BBSK?

The statistical background for Amed vs Manisa BBSK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.