Türkiye - Süper LigSeyrantepe Spor Kompleksi Stadyumu 1Data current as of 15 October 2026

Amed vs Trabzonspor: match statistics

Amed crest
Amed
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Trabzonspor crest
Trabzonspor

Amed vs Trabzonspor: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amed played Trabzonspor in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 31 August 2026. Venue: Seyrantepe Spor Kompleksi Stadyumu 1. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Amed: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Trabzonspor: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amed scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Trabzonspor scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amed 0%, Trabzonspor 100%. Over 2.5: Amed 50%, Trabzonspor 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Trabzonspor has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.23. Amed: 12.5 shots per match, Trabzonspor: 16.0.

Match halves

Amed: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. Trabzonspor: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Amed: 61-75 (2 goals). Trabzonspor: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Süper Lig: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed have a perfect home record so far: they won their only match, scored 3 goals and kept a clean sheet, with an xG against of just 0.75. Trabzonspor, however, are in clearly better overall form, collecting 10 points from their last five matches thanks to 3 wins, a draw and just one defeat, while Amed have picked up 5 points during that period. The visitors create slightly more high-quality chances away from home, as reflected by an xG of 1.66 compared with the hosts’ 1.39, and also enjoy more possession, at 60% versus 46%. Both teams average 13 shots and 5 shots on target, but Trabzonspor are yet to win away and drew their only such match. The combination of Amed’s very solid home defensive record and the visitors’ strong current form points towards a closely contested draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal from the last five matches is cautious for BTTS, as both Amed and Trabzonspor produced this outcome in only 40% of their games, compared with the league average of 39%. Trabzonspor have notably improved defensively, conceding just 3 goals during this period, or 0.6 per match, despite Amed averaging 1.4 goals scored. The hosts have recently conceded 1.6 goals per game, while the visitors have created chances worth 1.69 xG, so a Trabzonspor goal remains likely. However, Amed have an xG of 1.60, while their opponents allow only 1.17 xG on average, increasing the risk that the hosts will fail to score. The season-long 100% BTTS record for both teams conflicts with the more recent sample and the visitors’ highly solid defence, so the marginal preference is for BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have surpassed this line in 100% of their league matches so far. Amed averaged 2.0 goals scored at home and created chances worth 2.00 xG, while Trabzonspor recorded 1.66 xG and averaged 1.0 goal away from home. Current form is more subdued, but still supports at least two goals: in their last five matches, Amed scored 1.4 goals per game and Trabzonspor 1.6, resulting in a projected total of 2.65 goals. The 2.5 line is considerably less reliable, as both teams went Over 2.5 goals in only 40% of their last five appearances, while Trabzonspor conceded just 0.6 goals per match during that period.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Trabzonspor are showing clearly stronger current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 2.0 points per game, while Amed have recorded just 1 win and averaged 1.0 point. The strongest signal concerns the first halves: the visitors led at the break in 75% of their recent matches, while Amed have not led at half-time in any of them, drawing after 45 minutes in 80% of games. Trabzonspor score an average of 1.0 goal before the break and concede just 0.25, whereas the hosts score only 0.4 goals and concede 0.6. Amed have conceded an average of 1.6 goals per match over their last five games, while Trabzonspor’s defence allows just 0.6, reinforcing the scenario of the visitors maintaining their lead until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
AmedTrabzonspor
17Shots8
AmedTrabzonspor
7Shots on target5
AmedTrabzonspor
1.76xG1.1
AmedTrabzonspor
2Corners5
AmedTrabzonspor
28Dangerous attacks31
AmedTrabzonspor
18Fouls10
AmedTrabzonspor
5Cards3
AmedTrabzonspor

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.5
AmedTrabzonspor
1Goals conceded / match1
AmedTrabzonspor
51%Average possession57%
AmedTrabzonspor
3Shots on target / match6.5
AmedTrabzonspor

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match16
AmedTrabzonspor
3Shots on target6.5
AmedTrabzonspor
12%Shot conversion9.4%
AmedTrabzonspor
51%Possession57%
AmedTrabzonspor
1.23xG for1.83
AmedTrabzonspor
0.94xG against1.2
AmedTrabzonspor

Shooting quality

Amed: BalancedTrabzonspor: Dominant
AmedTrabzonspor
Accuracy (shots on target)24%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Trabzonspor is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Amed · 2 pts / match - Trabzonspor

Amed
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
Trabzonspor
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Trabzonspor keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Trabzonspor scoring profile: very strong

Trabzonspor scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)3
AmedTrabzonspor
2Goals conceded (season)2
AmedTrabzonspor
2.5Average goals in match2.5
AmedTrabzonspor
3Goals scored (last 5)3
AmedTrabzonspor
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
AmedTrabzonspor

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
AmedTrabzonspor
50%2 goals50%
AmedTrabzonspor
50%3 goals0%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%4 goals0%
AmedTrabzonspor

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
AmedTrabzonspor
50%2 goals0%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%3 goals0%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%4 goals0%
AmedTrabzonspor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%Scored in both halves50%
AmedTrabzonspor

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
AmedTrabzonspor
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%BTTS - last 5100%
AmedTrabzonspor

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
AmedTrabzonspor
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AmedTrabzonspor

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AmedTrabzonspor
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
AmedTrabzonspor
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AmedTrabzonspor

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Trabzonspor is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Amed · 2 pts / match - Trabzonspor

Amed - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Trabzonspor - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)2
AmedTrabzonspor
0Goals scored (1st half)1
AmedTrabzonspor
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AmedTrabzonspor
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
AmedTrabzonspor
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AmedTrabzonspor
100%No goal before half-time0%
AmedTrabzonspor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
AmedTrabzonspor
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
AmedTrabzonspor
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
AmedTrabzonspor
2Average goals (2nd half)1
AmedTrabzonspor
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AmedTrabzonspor
50%No goal after half-time50%
AmedTrabzonspor

Amed - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Trabzonspor - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.50
Goals scored / match0.01.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match0.52.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Trabzonspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.50
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amed
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Trabzonspor
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Trabzonspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaTrabzonspor
Average goals in match▼ 2.502.60▼ 2.50
Both teams scored▼ 0%52%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%44%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%24%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%72%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%92%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
92%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TrabzonsporSubstitutionOn: Doguhan Aral SimsirOff: Noah Jose Saviolo
  2. TrabzonsporYellow cardSidny Lopes Cabral
  3. TrabzonsporYellow cardChibuike Nwaiwu
  4. AmedSubstitutionOn: Gift Emmanuel OrbanOff: Yira Collins Sor
  5. TrabzonsporSubstitutionOn: Ozan TufanOff: Fábio Henrique Tavares
  6. AmedYellow cardSamuel Ballet
  7. AmedSubstitutionOn: Amadou CisséOff: Mbaye Diagne
  8. AmedYellow cardCengiz Umut Meraş
  9. AmedYellow cardFurkan Soyalp
  10. AmedYellow cardGift Emmanuel Orban
  11. AmedYellow cardErmal Krasniqi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs Trabzonspor?

The Süper Lig match finished Amed 2:1 Trabzonspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Trabzonspor?

Amed score 1.50 goals per game on average and Trabzonspor 1.50. The Süper Lig average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Amed's matches and 100% of Trabzonspor's.

What form are Amed and Trabzonspor in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Trabzonspor 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Trabzonspor?

The statistical background for Amed vs Trabzonspor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.