Amed vs Ümraniyespor: match statistics
Amed vs Ümraniyespor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Amed played Ümraniyespor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Amed: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Ümraniyespor: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Amed scores 2.21 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Ümraniyespor scores 1.18 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Amed 53%, Ümraniyespor 38%. Over 2.5: Amed 59%, Ümraniyespor 38%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.16. Amed: 15.1 shots per match, Ümraniyespor: 9.6.
Match halves
Amed: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.21. Ümraniyespor: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Amed: 76-90+ (18 goals). Ümraniyespor: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table, have 21 wins and 75 goals this season, and at home they score 2.47 goals on average while conceding only 0.65 per match. In their last 5 fixtures Amed have won all 5, scoring 17 goals (3.4 per match) and conceding just 2 (0.4 per match), yielding 3 points per game over that span. Ümraniyespor, 15th, have 12 wins and 40 goals this season, but on the road they average only 0.59 goals, fail to score in 53% of away matches and manage just 2.88 shots on target per game versus Amed’s 6.59 at home. The quality gap is confirmed by xG: Amed generate 1.94 xG at home with 1.07 xG against, while the visitors have 0.99 xG away and 1.54 xG against, and shot conversion is 14% for the hosts versus 7% for the visitors. Considering higher possession (54% vs 48%), 47% clean sheets for the hosts vs 18% for the visitors, and the home run of 5 wins, I predict an Amed victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Amed scores an average of 1.76 goals per match and concedes 1.06, while Ümraniyespor scores only 0.59 and concedes 1.41. Season BTTS rate is 47% for Amed and 29% for Ümraniyespor, and in the last 5 matches 40% and 20% respectively, indicating the visitors are much less likely to be involved in Goal/Goal games. xG shows Amed 1.33 xG per match versus 0.99 xG for Ümraniyespor, and the visitors average just 2.88 shots on target with a 7% conversion rate, supporting the thesis of poor away attacking efficiency. Amed have 75 goals scored this season and netted 17 in the last 5 matches (3.4 per match), while keeping a clean sheet in 41% of matches, so the probability that the hosts will be the only team to score is high. Considering the low away goals average of 0.59, the visitors’ season BTTS of 29% and the weak 7% conversion rate, I assign 25% chance to BTTS - Yes and 75% to BTTS - No and recommend a 'No' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Amed has a clear offensive advantage: they score on average 1.76 goals at home, register 5.18 shots on target and 10.76 shots overall, and in the last 5 matches have scored 17 goals (avg. 3.4) while conceding only 2. Ümraniyespor are much weaker offensively away — on average 0.59 goals, 2.88 shots on target and a conversion rate of 7%, with just 5 goals in their last 5 matches. A model based on xG yields expected goals of 1.44 for the home side (home xG 1.33 and opponent defense 1.54 → average 1.44) and 1.17 for the visitors (away xG 0.99 and home defense 1.36 → average 1.17), totaling ≈2.61 goals. Seasonal indicators confirm the trend: 71% of Amed’s matches finish over 1.5 goals, 59% for away teams for over 1.5, and the last 5 home matches show 80% over 2.5; therefore I assign a high probability to Over 1.5 (86%) and a moderate probability to Over 2.5 (62%). Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonal 35% for Amed and 12% for Ümraniyespor), so I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest data signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Amed is favored to lead at the break and to maintain the victory: the hosts score an average of 0.82 goals by half-time versus 0.29 for Ümraniyespor and led at the break in 35% of matches compared to 18% for the visitors. Additionally, Amed averages 5.18 shots on target versus 2.88 and has a higher xG (1.33 vs 0.99) and better conversion rate (16% vs 7%), which increases the likelihood of goals in the first half. In full time the hosts win 47% of matches compared to 24% for the visitors and score an average of 1.76 goals per match vs 0.59 for Ümraniyespor; in the last five matches Amed led at the break in 60% and averaged 1.4 goals by half-time (visitors 0.2), which confirms their advantage. Taking this into account, I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 HT/FT scenario (around 28%), with a close signal being a draw at half-time and a home victory (X/1 approximately 26%) due to the high share of half-time draws (47%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | Ümraniyespor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Amed is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Amed · 1.4 pts / match - Ümraniyespor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 87% better for: goals scored per match.
2.21 goals / match - Amed · 1.18 goals / match - Ümraniyespor
Amed is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Amed · 1.24 goals / match - Ümraniyespor
Amed scores in 85% of matches (29 of 34 matches), while Ümraniyespor keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).
Ümraniyespor scores in 62% of matches (21 of 34 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Amed
Over / Under - Ümraniyespor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.79 pts / match - Amed · 1.21 pts / match - Ümraniyespor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ümraniyespor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Amed
Ümraniyespor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | Ümraniyespor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.21 | 2.91 | ▼ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 49% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 54% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 29% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 72% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 79% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Amed 1 - 0 - 0 Ümraniyespor. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs Ümraniyespor?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 2:2 Ümraniyespor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Ümraniyespor?
Amed score 2.21 goals per game on average and Ümraniyespor 1.18. The 1. Lig average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Amed's matches and 38% of Ümraniyespor's.
What form are Amed and Ümraniyespor in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Ümraniyespor 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Ümraniyespor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Amed vs Ümraniyespor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


