Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 11 September 2026

Amed vs Van BB: match statistics

Amed crest
Amed
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Van BB crest
Van BB
165%(1.55)
X25%(4.00)
210%(5.00)

Amed presents impressive home form with 77% of matches won at home and only one draw in the last five meetings. The hosts score an average of 2.46 goals per home match, conceding just 0.77, resulting in a +22 goal difference. Van BB performs significantly worse away – winning only 25% of matches, often failing to score (42% FTS%), and conceding an average of 1.42 goals. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.09), and the advantage in possession and shot efficiency confirms Amed's dominance. Taking all parameters into account, a victory for the hosts is the most probable scenario.

Amed vs Van BB: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Amed played Van BB in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 23 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Amed: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Van BB: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Amed scores 2.12 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Van BB scores 1.50 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Amed 58%, Van BB 50%. Over 2.5: Amed 62%, Van BB 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.26. Amed: 15.1 shots per match, Van BB: 10.9.

Match halves

Amed: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.15. Van BB: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Amed: 76-90+ (14 goals). Van BB: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed presents impressive home form with 77% of matches won at home and only one draw in the last five meetings. The hosts score an average of 2.46 goals per home match, conceding just 0.77, resulting in a +22 goal difference. Van BB performs significantly worse away – winning only 25% of matches, often failing to score (42% FTS%), and conceding an average of 1.42 goals. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.09), and the advantage in possession and shot efficiency confirms Amed's dominance. Taking all parameters into account, a victory for the hosts is the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
AmedVan BB
14Shots7
AmedVan BB
3Shots on target3
AmedVan BB
1.52xG0.82
AmedVan BB
4Corners3
AmedVan BB
58Dangerous attacks22
AmedVan BB
12Fouls17
AmedVan BB
2Cards3
AmedVan BB

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.12Goals scored / match1.5
AmedVan BB
1.15Goals conceded / match1.08
AmedVan BB
52%Average possession55%
AmedVan BB
5.54Shots on target / match4.12
AmedVan BB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.08Shots per match10.92
AmedVan BB
5.54Shots on target4.12
AmedVan BB
14%Shot conversion13.7%
AmedVan BB
52%Possession55%
AmedVan BB
1.66xG for1.26
AmedVan BB
1.18xG against1.29
AmedVan BB

Shooting quality

Amed: AttackingVan BB: Efficient finishing
AmedVan BB
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Van BB is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Amed · 2 pts / match - Van BB

Amed
DWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
58% W23% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-5
1.96 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Van BB
WLWDW
Season result split
38% W31% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-8
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

2.12 goals / match - Amed · 1.5 goals / match - Van BB

Van BB is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.15 goals / match - Amed · 1.08 goals / match - Van BB

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Van BB keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).

Van BB scoring profile: strong

Van BB scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).

55Goals scored (season)39
AmedVan BB
30Goals conceded (season)28
AmedVan BB
3.27Average goals in match2.58
AmedVan BB
12Goals scored (last 5)12
AmedVan BB
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
AmedVan BB

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal65%
AmedVan BB
58%2 goals38%
AmedVan BB
27%3 goals38%
AmedVan BB
19%4 goals8%
AmedVan BB

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal69%
AmedVan BB
31%2 goals35%
AmedVan BB
12%3 goals4%
AmedVan BB
4%4 goals0%
AmedVan BB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time19%
AmedVan BB
8%BTTS in both halves4%
AmedVan BB
35%Scored in both halves31%
AmedVan BB

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
AmedVan BB
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
AmedVan BB
60%BTTS - last 560%
AmedVan BB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
AmedVan BB
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
AmedVan BB
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
AmedVan BB

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
AmedVan BB
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
AmedVan BB
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
AmedVan BB

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.77 pts / match - Amed · 1.12 pts / match - Van BB

Amed - half-time state
46% leading38% draw15% trailing
Van BB - half-time state
23% leading42% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.77Points per match (1st half)1.12
AmedVan BB
0.96Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AmedVan BB
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
AmedVan BB
1.46Average goals (1st half)1.12
AmedVan BB
62%Clean sheet before half-time54%
AmedVan BB
38%No goal before half-time62%
AmedVan BB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.62
AmedVan BB
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)1
AmedVan BB
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
AmedVan BB
1.81Average goals (2nd half)1.46
AmedVan BB
54%Clean sheet after half-time62%
AmedVan BB
46%No goal after half-time42%
AmedVan BB

Amed - second-half results

42% W31% D27% L
46
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Van BB - second-half results

42% W35% D23% L
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Van BB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.40
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-3+8
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Amed
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
7
5
16-30
13
7
31-45
11
1
46-60
5
7
61-75
14
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Van BB
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
4
6
16-30
7
5
31-45
8
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Van BB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaVan BB
Average goals in match 3.272.96 2.58
Both teams scored 58%51% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%55% 50%
Clean sheets 31%28% 31%
Goal before half-time 73%72% 65%
Goal after half-time 81%82% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Van BBYellow cardSanteri Hostikka
  2. AmedYellow cardAdama Traoré
  3. Van BBSubstitutionOn: Emir BarsOff: Erdem Seçgin
  4. Van BBSubstitutionOn: Aliou Badara TraoréOff: Kenneth Obinna Mamah
  5. AmedSubstitutionOn: Daniel Moreno MosqueraOff: Florent Hasani
  6. Van BBYellow cardJefferson Nogueira Junior
  7. Van BBSubstitutionOn: Alper DemirolOff: Jefferson Nogueira Junior
  8. AmedYellow cardFelix Ohene Afena-Gyan
  9. Van BBYellow cardŽan Jevšenak

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Amed 0 - 0 - 1 Van BB. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Van Büyükşehir Belediyesi Spor Kulübü
3 : 0
Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs Van BB?

The 1. Lig match finished Amed 1:0 Van BB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Van BB?

Amed score 2.12 goals per game on average and Van BB 1.50. The 1. Lig average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Amed's matches and 50% of Van BB's.

What form are Amed and Van BB in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Van BB 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Van BB?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.