Andijan vs Buxoro: match statistics
Andijan vs Buxoro: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Andijan played Buxoro in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 27 July 2026. Venue: Stadion Soglom Avlod. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Andijan: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Buxoro: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Andijan scores 1.54 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Buxoro scores 1.31 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Andijan 46%, Buxoro 54%. Over 2.5: Andijan 69%, Buxoro 38%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Andijan has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.36. Andijan: 11.8 shots per match, Buxoro: 11.4.
Match halves
Andijan: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.08. Buxoro: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Andijan: 76-90+ (8 goals). Buxoro: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Andijan to win (1) as the hosts have a clear home efficiency edge: 1.67 goals scored per match at home versus Buxoro’s 1.17 on the road, and the hosts’ xG is 1.58 compared to the visitors’ 1.34. Andijan defends better at home, conceding 1.00 goal per match while Buxoro concedes 1.50 away and has a higher xG against (1.63 vs 1.12), indicating greater defensive vulnerability for the visitors. The hosts create more chances and control the game — 13 average shots and 4.67 shots on target at home with 53% possession, versus Buxoro’s 12 shots, 4.17 on target and 43% possession, plus a higher conversion rate 13% vs 10%. Form trends also favor the hosts: Andijan scored 16 and conceded 8 in the last 5 matches (averages 3.2 and 1.6), while Buxoro scored 5 and conceded 7 (1.0 and 1.4), and Andijan has higher PPG over the last 5 (1.6 vs 1.4). Considering these figures I estimate Andijan’s win probability at ~55%, draw 20% and Buxoro win 25%, noting the draw/upset risk remains because Buxoro currently sit 3rd in the table versus Andijan in 9th.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I tip BTTS - Yes because both teams present strong scoring signals: season BTTS is 43% for Andijan and 67% for Buxoro, versus a league BTTS level of 56%. Recent form over the last 5 matches is especially relevant — Andijan has BTTS in 100% (5/5) and Buxoro 60% (3/5); additionally Andijan averages 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 goals) while Buxoro averages 1.0 (5 goals), which increases the likelihood of goal exchange. xG also supports both teams scoring: Andijan’s attacking xG is 1.37 versus Buxoro’s average xG against of 1.63, while Buxoro’s attacking xG is 1.34 versus Andijan’s xG against of 1.23 — both sides have potential for at least ~1.0 xG in the matchup. On the other hand, season averages of goals conceded show some differences: Buxoro concedes 1.50 goals on the season (1.4 in the last 5), and Andijan averages 0.57 for the season, although recently Andijan concedes 1.6 goals per game in the last 5, indicating the defense is less stable than the season figure suggests. Considering Andijan’s 100% BTTS in the last 5, Buxoro’s season 67% BTTS, and comparable shooting stats (10.86 vs 12.0) and shots on target (4.43 vs 4.17), I assess a 75% chance for Yes and 25% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-defense-based model projects approximately 1.50 goals for Andijan ((1.37+1.63)/2 = 1.50) and 1.29 for Buxoro ((1.34+1.23)/2 = 1.29), for an expected total of 2.79 goals. Season-to-date Over 1.5 rates are 57% for Andijan and 67% for Buxoro (average 62%), and Andijan has scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per game) while averaging 4.43 shots on target, which increases the likelihood of exceeding 1.5 goals. Over 2.5 is more mixed: season rates 29% (Andijan) vs 50% (Buxoro) (avg ~39.5%), but the last 5 matches show 80%/60% (avg 70%) and the 2.79 projected total, so I assess Over 2.5 at roughly 55%. Over 3.5 remains unlikely (seasonal 14%/33%, avg ~24% and expected total 2.79 << 3.5), therefore the strongest signal is a play on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Andijan is a clear favorite to have the lead at the break and to maintain the win: the hosts led at half-time in 5 of 7 matches (71%), while Buxoro led only in 1 of 6 (17%). In the first 45 minutes Andijan averages 0.71 goals scored and 0.29 conceded, whereas Buxoro averages 0.67 scored and 0.83 conceded, giving a defensive edge to the hosts before the break. Over the full match Andijan registers 1.43 goals with an xG of 1.37 and concedes only 0.57, while Buxoro has 1.17 goals and concedes 1.50 with an xG against of 1.63, so the defensive differential (0.57 vs 1.50) and the higher home win rate (71% vs 33%) support holding the lead. Although the visitors fit a BTTS profile at 67%, HT BTTS for the hosts is 0%, meaning Buxoro rarely scores before half-time and will most likely need a turnaround after the break. Therefore the strongest signal is the 1/1 scenario, which I assign 56% probability to, with 11% on 1/X and 17% on 2/2 as the main alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Andijan | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Andijan is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Andijan · 1.8 pts / match - Buxoro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Andijan is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.54 goals / match - Andijan · 1.31 goals / match - Buxoro
Buxoro is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.23 goals / match - Andijan · 1 goals / match - Buxoro
Andijan scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Buxoro scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Andijan
Over / Under - Buxoro
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Buxoro is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - Andijan · 1.69 pts / match - Buxoro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Andijan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Buxoro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Andijan
Buxoro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Andijan | Liga | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.77 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.31 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 56% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 52% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 69% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 78% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Andijan 0 - 2 - 0 Buxoro. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Andijan vs Buxoro?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Andijan 2:0 Buxoro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Andijan and Buxoro?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Andijan won 0, Buxoro won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Buxoro?
Andijan score 1.54 goals per game on average and Buxoro 1.31. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Andijan's matches and 54% of Buxoro's.
What form are Andijan and Buxoro in?
Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Buxoro 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Buxoro?
The statistical background for Andijan vs Buxoro — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


