Andijan vs Pakhtakor: match statistics
Andijan vs Pakhtakor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Andijan played Pakhtakor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Soglom Avlod. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Andijan: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Pakhtakor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Andijan scores 1.57 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Pakhtakor scores 1.86 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Andijan 43%, Pakhtakor 64%. Over 2.5: Andijan 64%, Pakhtakor 50%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Pakhtakor has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.51. Andijan: 11.9 shots per match, Pakhtakor: 13.5.
Match halves
Andijan: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.14. Pakhtakor: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Andijan: 76-90+ (9 goals). Pakhtakor: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 6.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pakhtakor are the favorites: they sit 2nd in the table, with 10 wins, 3 draws and only 1 loss this season, and on the road they win 83% of matches with 0% defeats and 50% clean sheets. Andijan show strong offensive output at home — averaging 1.71 goals per game and xG 1.62, and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 15 goals (3.0 per game), but conceded 7 goals in that period (1.4 per game). Despite the hosts' higher home xG (1.62 vs 1.44) Pakhtakor are more efficient and defensively stable: they concede only 0.67 goals on average away versus Andijan’s 0.86 and keep 50% clean sheets compared to the hosts’ 43%. Additionally, the visitors have 0% matches without scoring on the road (FTS 0%), while Andijan failed to score in 14% of their home games, which favors Pakhtakor’s attacking consistency. Considering table position, average points over the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.6) and the visitors’ defensive edge, I predict a Pakhtakor win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Andijan has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Pakhtakor is at 50% seasonally and 40% in the last 5, with the league average at 56%, which favors the Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) outcome. Andijan averages 2.0 goals per match (3.0 in the last 5) and records xG_for 1.65, while Pakhtakor scores 1.67 (1.4 in the last 5) with xG_for 1.44, so both sides are generating goal opportunities. Defensive comparison shows Andijan concedes 1.25 goals seasonally (xG_against 1.23), and Pakhtakor concedes 0.67 (xG_against 1.16), meaning Andijan has a strong chance to score against the weaker defense, and Pakhtakor has a realistic chance to score against Andijan (1.67 vs 1.25). The risk to BTTS comes from Pakhtakor keeping 50% clean sheets seasonally versus 13% for Andijan, so a no-goal scenario for one side is possible. Overall I assess BTTS probability at 65% (Yes) vs 35% (No) and recommend a 'yes' bet due to Andijan's strong scoring signals (75%/80%) and stable xG profiles for both teams.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast a match with a clear likelihood of goals: xG is 1.65 for Andijan and 1.44 for Pakhtakor, and average goals scored are 2.0 (Andijan at home) and 1.67 (Pakhtakor away), yielding expected goals of 1.40 for the home side and 1.34 for the visitors (total 2.74). Andijan has averaged 3.0 goals in their last 5 matches and has 100% of home games this season over 1.5 goals, while Pakhtakor has 50% of games over 1.5 and 50% clean sheets away. Defensively Andijan concedes 1.25 goals at home on average, and Pakhtakor only 0.67 away, indicating the visitors can limit goals but do not exclude them (seasonal scoring rates: 75% for home team, 50% for away). From these data the safest bet is Over 1.5 (estimated probability ~76%); the 2.5 line has only a moderate edge (~52% for Over), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~29%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a lead for Andijan is more likely: the hosts led at the break in 4 home matches (50%) and score an average of 1.13 goals in the first half, while Pakhtakor averages 0.50 goals by half-time. After the break the advantage shifts to the visitors — Pakhtakor scored 5 goals in minutes 46–60 and averages 1.17 goals in the second half versus 0.88 for Andijan; points gained after the break are 14 for Pakhtakor vs 10 for the hosts (average points after the break 2.33 vs 1.25). Additionally Pakhtakor has better season-long results: 83% wins compared to 63% for Andijan and 0% away losses, which increases the visitors’ chance of overturning the deficit and winning. Considering the hosts’ half-time leads (50%) and the visitors’ second-half strength (higher average goals and points), the strongest signal is the 1/2 scenario — Andijan leading at half-time with Pakhtakor winning by full-time, which I assign a 30% probability. I distributed the remaining probabilities to reflect moderate chances of the lead holding (1/1 — 12%, 1/X — 8%), draw scenarios (X/X — 14%) or the visitors winning from a draw (X/2 — 20%) and low probabilities for situations where Pakhtakor leads at half-time (2/2 — 5%, 2/X — 1%, 2/1 — 0%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Andijan | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Andijan is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Andijan · 1.8 pts / match - Pakhtakor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pakhtakor is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Andijan · 1.86 goals / match - Pakhtakor
Pakhtakor is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Andijan · 1 goals / match - Pakhtakor
Andijan scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
Pakhtakor scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Andijan
Over / Under — Pakhtakor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pakhtakor is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Andijan · 1.79 pts / match - Pakhtakor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Andijan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pakhtakor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Andijan
Pakhtakor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Andijan | Liga | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.71 | 2.62 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 56% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 25% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 68% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 79% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Andijan 1 - 0 - 1 Pakhtakor. Average goals 6.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Andijan vs Pakhtakor?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Andijan 0:0 Pakhtakor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Andijan and Pakhtakor?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Andijan won 1, Pakhtakor won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Pakhtakor?
Andijan score 1.57 goals per game on average and Pakhtakor 1.86. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Andijan's matches and 64% of Pakhtakor's.
What form are Andijan and Pakhtakor in?
Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Pakhtakor 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Pakhtakor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


