Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueStadion Soglom AvlodData current as of 15 October 2026

Andijan vs Qizilqum: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Andijan vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Andijan play Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 15 October 2026. Venue: Stadion Soglom Avlod.

Current form

Andijan: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Qizilqum: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Andijan scores 1.22 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Qizilqum scores 1.00 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Andijan 39%, Qizilqum 35%. Over 2.5: Andijan 61%, Qizilqum 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Andijan has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.24. Andijan: 11.7 shots per match, Qizilqum: 9.9.

Match halves

Andijan: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.87. Qizilqum: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Andijan: 76-90+ (12 goals). Qizilqum: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match1
AndijanQizilqum
1.39Goals conceded / match1.3
AndijanQizilqum
51%Average possession39%
AndijanQizilqum
4.13Shots on target / match3.13
AndijanQizilqum

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.74Shots per match9.91
AndijanQizilqum
4.13Shots on target3.13
AndijanQizilqum
10.4%Shot conversion10.1%
AndijanQizilqum
51%Possession39%
AndijanQizilqum
1.47xG for1.24
AndijanQizilqum
1.28xG against1.47
AndijanQizilqum

Shooting quality

Andijan: BalancedQizilqum: Balanced
AndijanQizilqum
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Qizilqum is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Andijan · 2 pts / match - Qizilqum

Andijan
WLWLL
Season result split
39% W13% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Qizilqum
WWLWD
Season result split
39% W13% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Andijan is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Andijan · 1 goals / match - Qizilqum

Qizilqum is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.39 goals / match - Andijan · 1.3 goals / match - Qizilqum

Andijan scoring profile: strong

Andijan scores in 65% of matches (15 of 23 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).

Qizilqum scoring profile: mixed

Qizilqum scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

28Goals scored (season)23
AndijanQizilqum
32Goals conceded (season)30
AndijanQizilqum
2.61Average goals in match2.3
AndijanQizilqum
5Goals scored (last 5)7
AndijanQizilqum
12Goals conceded (last 5)4
AndijanQizilqum

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal57%
AndijanQizilqum
35%2 goals30%
AndijanQizilqum
17%3 goals13%
AndijanQizilqum
4%4 goals0%
AndijanQizilqum

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal70%
AndijanQizilqum
39%2 goals35%
AndijanQizilqum
26%3 goals13%
AndijanQizilqum
9%4 goals9%
AndijanQizilqum

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time13%
AndijanQizilqum
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AndijanQizilqum
17%Scored in both halves17%
AndijanQizilqum

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
AndijanQizilqum
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
AndijanQizilqum
60%BTTS - last 540%
AndijanQizilqum

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
AndijanQizilqum
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
AndijanQizilqum
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
AndijanQizilqum

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
AndijanQizilqum
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
AndijanQizilqum
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
AndijanQizilqum

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Andijan - half-time state
22% leading52% draw26% trailing
Qizilqum - half-time state
26% leading43% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.22
AndijanQizilqum
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.43
AndijanQizilqum
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
AndijanQizilqum
0.74Average goals (1st half)1.04
AndijanQizilqum
70%Clean sheet before half-time57%
AndijanQizilqum
74%No goal before half-time65%
AndijanQizilqum

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.04
AndijanQizilqum
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
AndijanQizilqum
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
AndijanQizilqum
1.87Average goals (2nd half)1.13
AndijanQizilqum
43%Clean sheet after half-time52%
AndijanQizilqum
43%No goal after half-time65%
AndijanQizilqum

Andijan - second-half results

48% W13% D39% L
27
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qizilqum - second-half results

17% W52% D30% L
28
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Andijan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Andijan
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
3
4
16-30
1
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
2
61-75
12
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
6
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
8
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Andijan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AndijanLigaQizilqum
Average goals in match▼ 2.612.71▼ 2.30
Both teams scored▼ 39%55%▼ 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 61%55%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 35%26%▲ 30%
Goal before half-time▼ 52%68%▼ 65%
Goal after half-time▲ 91%77%▼ 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Andijan 0 - 1 - 2 Qizilqum. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Qizilqum
2 : 1
Andijan
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
2 : 1
FK Andijan
FK Andijan
1 : 1
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK

FAQ

When do Andijan and Qizilqum play?

Andijan face Qizilqum on 15 October 2026 in Uzbekistan Super League at Stadion Soglom Avlod. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Andijan and Qizilqum?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Andijan won 0, Qizilqum won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Qizilqum?

Andijan score 1.22 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 1.00. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Andijan's matches and 35% of Qizilqum's.

What form are Andijan and Qizilqum in?

Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Qizilqum 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Qizilqum?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.