Andijan vs Termez Surkhon: match statistics
Andijan vs Termez Surkhon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Andijan played Termez Surkhon in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: Stadion Soglom Avlod. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Andijan: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Termez Surkhon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Andijan scores 1.45 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Termez Surkhon scores 1.00 and concedes 1.64. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Andijan 36%, Termez Surkhon 55%. Over 2.5: Andijan 64%, Termez Surkhon 45%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Andijan has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.20. Andijan: 11.6 shots per match, Termez Surkhon: 11.2.
Match halves
Andijan: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91. Termez Surkhon: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Andijan: 76-90+ (7 goals). Termez Surkhon: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I pick '1' — an Andijan win. Andijan holds a clear edge in form and attacking metrics. Andijan won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 17 goals in those five games (3.4 goals per game), averaging 2.6 points per match in that period. Termez Surkhon over their last 5 matches has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) and conceded 10 goals (2.0 per game), averaging 1.4 points per match across those five fixtures. At home Andijan averages 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded with an average xG of 1.64 and 5.2 shots on target per game, while Termez away averages 1.0 goals, 2.2 conceded, xG 1.06 and only 2.2 shots on target. The defensive gap (0.8 vs 2.2 conceded) and superiority in chance creation (xG 1.64 vs 1.06), combined with the recent form advantage, lead me to estimate the hosts’ win probability at 70%, draw 18% and the away win at 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics favor BTTS - Yes: in the last 5 matches both Andijan and Termez Surkhon recorded BTTS in 80% of cases (4/5), while season figures are 50% for Andijan and 60% for Termez. xG indicates both teams create and concede chances — Andijan has xG 1.31 with xG against 1.54, Termez xG 1.06 with xG against 1.58. Over the last 5 matches Andijan averaged 3.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded (17 for, 4 against), whereas Termez averaged 1.8 scored and 2.0 conceded (9 for, 10 against), suggesting Andijan scores regularly while Termez concedes regularly. Additionally Andijan averages 12.67 shots and 2.83 on target versus Termez 9.4 and 2.2, season clean sheets are low (17% and 20%), and the league BTTS rate is 53%, so the both teams to score scenario looks more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
An xG-based model projects 1.45 expected goals for Andijan and 1.30 for Termez Surkhon, totaling 2.75 expected goals for the match. Seasonal metrics show Over 1.5 occurred in 67% of Andijan’s matches and 80% of Termez’s, while Over 0.5 appeared in 83% and 100% respectively, confirming a goal-prone trend. Termez concedes on average 2.2 goals per game; Andijan averages 12.67 shots and 2.83 shots on target per game with a conversion rate of 8%. Both teams register BTTS at 50% and 60% (recent 5 matches BTTS 80% for both), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Poisson modeling and the above indicators yield approximately 76% probability for Over 1.5, ~53% for Over 2.5 and ~31% for Over 3.5, in line with the league Over 2.5 average ~52%. Given the combined xG of 2.75, Andijan’s high shot volume and Termez’s weak defense (2.2 goals conceded), the strongest play is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Andijan leading at the break and the hosts winning (HT/FT 1/1) — I assign this a 52% probability. In their last 5 matches Andijan led at half-time in 4 games (80%) and averaged 1.8 goals by the break, while Termez Surkhon has a seasonal half-time average of 0.0 goals and is losing at the break in 80% of matches. The hosts generate more high-quality chances: xG 1.31 versus 1.06 for the visitors, 12.67 shots versus 9.4 and 2.83 shots on target versus 2.2, which increases the likelihood of a goal before half-time. Additionally, the visitors concede an average of 2.2 goals per match (seasonConcededAVG_away = 2.2) and have a high share of goals in the second half (AVG_2hg_away = 2.2 and over05_2hg_percentage_away = 100%), so a turnaround after the break appears unlikely. For these reasons the 1/1 scenario is the strongest signal, and alternatives such as X/1 (12%) or 1/X (8%) I regard as significantly less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Andijan | Termez Surkhon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Andijan is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Andijan · 0.8 pts / match - Termez Surkhon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Andijan is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
1.45 goals / match - Andijan · 1 goals / match - Termez Surkhon
Andijan is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Andijan · 1.64 goals / match - Termez Surkhon
Andijan scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Termez Surkhon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
Termez Surkhon scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Andijan
Over / Under - Termez Surkhon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Andijan is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Andijan · 0.91 pts / match - Termez Surkhon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Andijan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Termez Surkhon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Andijan
Termez Surkhon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Andijan | Liga | Termez Surkhon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.45 | 2.55 | • 2.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 51% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 79% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Andijan 1 - 0 - 1 Termez Surkhon. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Andijan vs Termez Surkhon?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Andijan 1:2 Termez Surkhon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Andijan and Termez Surkhon?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Andijan won 1, Termez Surkhon won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Termez Surkhon?
Andijan score 1.45 goals per game on average and Termez Surkhon 1.00. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Andijan's matches and 55% of Termez Surkhon's.
What form are Andijan and Termez Surkhon in?
Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Termez Surkhon 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Termez Surkhon?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


