Andijan vs Xorazm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Andijan played Xorazm in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 21 November 2025. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Andijan: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Xorazm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Andijan scores 1.21 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Xorazm scores 1.04 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Andijan 57%, Xorazm 43%. Over 2.5: Andijan 43%, Xorazm 43%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Xorazm has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.34. Andijan: 11.4 shots per match, Xorazm: 13.1.

Match halves

Andijan: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.75. Xorazm: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Andijan: 76-90+ (10 goals). Xorazm: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

3 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
AndijanXorazm
9Shots11
AndijanXorazm
4Shots on target4
AndijanXorazm
0xG0
AndijanXorazm
1Corners3
AndijanXorazm
0Dangerous attacks0
AndijanXorazm
12Fouls15
AndijanXorazm
1Cards1
AndijanXorazm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.21Goals scored / match1.04
AndijanXorazm
1.71Goals conceded / match1.29
AndijanXorazm
49%Average possession49%
AndijanXorazm
3.57Shots on target / match4
AndijanXorazm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.43Shots per match13.11
AndijanXorazm
3.57Shots on target4
AndijanXorazm
10.6%Shot conversion7.9%
AndijanXorazm
49%Possession49%
AndijanXorazm
1.34xG for1.49
AndijanXorazm
1.52xG against1.45
AndijanXorazm

Shooting quality

Andijan: BalancedXorazm: Balanced
AndijanXorazm
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Andijan
WLDLL
Season result split
25% W29% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-13
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Xorazm
DWLLL
Season result split
21% W21% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-16
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Andijan is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Andijan · 1.04 goals / match - Xorazm

Xorazm is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - Andijan · 1.29 goals / match - Xorazm

Andijan scoring profile: strong

Andijan scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

Xorazm scoring profile: very strong

Xorazm scores in 61% of matches (17 of 28 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 matches).

34Goals scored (season)29
AndijanXorazm
48Goals conceded (season)36
AndijanXorazm
2.93Average goals in match2.32
AndijanXorazm
6Goals scored (last 5)5
AndijanXorazm
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
AndijanXorazm

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal61%
AndijanXorazm
32%2 goals29%
AndijanXorazm
18%3 goals14%
AndijanXorazm
4%4 goals0%
AndijanXorazm

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal75%
AndijanXorazm
50%2 goals36%
AndijanXorazm
14%3 goals14%
AndijanXorazm
11%4 goals4%
AndijanXorazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time29%
AndijanXorazm
11%BTTS in both halves7%
AndijanXorazm
11%Scored in both halves25%
AndijanXorazm

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
AndijanXorazm
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AndijanXorazm
60%BTTS - last 540%
AndijanXorazm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
AndijanXorazm
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
AndijanXorazm
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
AndijanXorazm

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
AndijanXorazm
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
AndijanXorazm
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
AndijanXorazm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Xorazm is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - Andijan · 1.21 pts / match - Xorazm

Andijan - half-time state
14% leading50% draw36% trailing
Xorazm - half-time state
21% leading57% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.21
AndijanXorazm
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.64
AndijanXorazm
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AndijanXorazm
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.14
AndijanXorazm
39%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AndijanXorazm
64%No goal before half-time54%
AndijanXorazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
AndijanXorazm
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
AndijanXorazm
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
AndijanXorazm
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.18
AndijanXorazm
32%Clean sheet after half-time43%
AndijanXorazm
57%No goal after half-time61%
AndijanXorazm

Andijan - second-half results

21% W36% R43% P
26
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding179%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Xorazm - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
34
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Andijan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Xorazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Andijan
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
3
6
16-30
4
9
31-45
7
8
46-60
4
5
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Xorazm
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
3
31-45
4
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+90%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Andijan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Xorazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AndijanLigaXorazm
Average goals in match 2.932.52 2.32
Both teams scored 57%46% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%46% 43%
Clean sheets 11%32% 25%
Goal before half-time 71%68% 68%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AndijanYellow cardDoniyor Abdumannopov
  2. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Sunnatilla AbdullajonovOff: Temur Ismoilov
  3. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Azizjon AkhrorovOff: Jasur Azimov
  4. AndijanSubstitutionOn: Otabek Jo‘raqo‘zievOff: Ismahil Akinade
  5. XorazmYellow cardIskander Shoykulov

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Andijan 1 - 0 - 0 Xorazm. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Xorazm FK Urganch
2 : 3
FK Andijan

FAQ

What was the result of Andijan vs Xorazm?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Andijan 3:2 Xorazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Xorazm?

Andijan score 1.21 goals per game on average and Xorazm 1.04. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Andijan's matches and 43% of Xorazm's.

What form are Andijan and Xorazm in?

Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Xorazm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Xorazm?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Andijan vs Xorazm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.