Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City: match statistics
Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ansan Greeners played Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Ansan Wa~ Stadium. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Ansan Greeners: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Gimhae City: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 and concedes 1.89 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.82 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ansan Greeners 61%, Gimhae City 71%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 61%, Gimhae City 53%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Gimhae City has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.13. Ansan Greeners: 8.6 shots per match, Gimhae City: 9.4.
Match halves
Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.56. Gimhae City: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Gimhae City: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gimhae City is a narrow favorite due to fresher form and superior defensive metrics: in their last 5 matches they scored 9 goals with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, while Ansan scored 4 goals with 2 wins and 3 losses. The defensive gap is clear – Ansan concedes 2.00 goals per home match, whereas Gimhae concedes 1.56 on the road; the visitors also have 22% clean sheets compared to the hosts’ 0%. Offensively Ansan at home averages 1.00 goals per game, xG 1.24 and 3.91 shots on target from 9.45 total shots, yet their 11% conversion rate has not translated into recent effectiveness. Gimhae away posts 0.89 goals per game, xG 1.15 and 3.67 shots on target, and have failed to score in only 11% of away matches versus 18% of Ansan’s home matches without a goal, which increases the visitors’ probability of scoring. Considering the 9 away goals in the last 5 matches, the better goals-against average 1.56 vs 2.00 and 1.6 points per game in the last 5 versus Ansan’s 1.2, I tip Gimhae to win (2) and propose the probability distribution: home 25%, draw 30%, away 45%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal statistics strongly favor BTTS: Ansan has 75% home matches with both teams scoring, Gimhae has 67% such away matches, and the league BTTS average is 63%. The hosts concede 2.5 goals per match on average this season and have no clean sheets at home (0% clean sheets), while Gimhae has scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 avg), increasing the likelihood that the visitors will find the net. Ansan produces xG 1.33 per match but actually scores only 0.75 goals and has a low shot conversion of 7%, whereas Gimhae has xG 1.15 and a higher conversion of 11%, so despite finishing issues the chances for goals from both sides remain high. In the short term Ansan has only 40% BTTS in the last 5 matches, and Gimhae 80%, and Ansan concedes 2.2 goals on average in the last 5 (11 conceded), which is a strong signal that the hosts are vulnerable to conceding. Considering the seasonal 75%/67% BTTS, Ansan’s lack of clean sheets and Gimhae’s 1.8 goals per match over the last 5, I recommend a bet on BTTS (Yes) as the more probable outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Aggregate xG and defensive metrics point to a goal-heavy game: Ansan’s attacking xG is 1.33, Gimhae’s attacking xG is 1.15, and xG against both teams is 1.86, yielding expected ~1.60 goals for the home side and ~1.50 for the visitors (total ~3.10). Seasonal rates confirm this trend — Over 1.5 occurs in 88% of Ansan’s matches and 78% of Gimhae’s, and both teams show high BTTS: 75% and 67%. Over 2.5 is more mixed: Ansan has 75% of matches with >2.5 goals, but Gimhae only 33%, so I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at roughly 66% — additionally Ansan concedes on average 2.5 goals per match, which raises the risk of goals. Over 3.5 looks weaker — seasonally 38% for the home side and 22% for the visitors, hence an assessment of Over 3.5 at about 32%. The strongest signal from the data is therefore Over 1.5 (high 88%/78%, total xG ~3.1 and BTTS above 67%), so I recommend staking on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a half-time draw and an away win after full-time (X/2). I expect a low-scoring first half: hosts average 0.25 goals in the first half, visitors 0.11, and half-time draws occur in 38% (hosts) and 33% (visitors) of matches, favoring a goalless or low-goals first half. After the break Gimhae City should hold the advantage — they collected 11 points in second halves versus Ansan’s 3, with average second-half points of 1.22 (away) vs 0.38 (home); visitors score on average 0.78 goals in the second half, while hosts concede on average 1.88. Additionally, visitors have 22% wins this season versus 0% for the hosts and better shot conversion 11% vs 7%, and Ansan concede as many as 11 goals in minutes 76–90, which increases the likelihood of an away turnaround after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ansan Greeners | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ansan Greeners is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 pts / match - Gimhae City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ansan Greeners is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 0.82 goals / match - Gimhae City
Ansan Greeners is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.89 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 2 goals / match - Gimhae City
Ansan Greeners scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).
Gimhae City scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Ansan Greeners
Over / Under — Gimhae City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ansan Greeners is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 0.71 pts / match - Gimhae City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimhae City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ansan Greeners
Gimhae City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Ansan Greeners | Liga | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.89 | 2.81 | • 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 61% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 56% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 22% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 72% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 78% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ansan Greeners 1 - 0 - 0 Gimhae City. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City?
The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 2:2 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City?
Ansan Greeners score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.82. The K League 2 average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 71% of Gimhae City's.
What form are Ansan Greeners and Gimhae City in?
Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimhae City 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


