South Korea - K League 2Ansan Wa~ StadiumData current as of 06 August 2026

Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City: match statistics

Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners
2 : 2half-time 1:2
Gimhae City crest
Gimhae City

Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ansan Greeners played Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Ansan Wa~ Stadium. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Ansan Greeners: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Gimhae City: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 and concedes 1.89 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.82 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.81 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ansan Greeners 61%, Gimhae City 71%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 61%, Gimhae City 53%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimhae City has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.13. Ansan Greeners: 8.6 shots per match, Gimhae City: 9.4.

Match halves

Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.56. Gimhae City: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Gimhae City: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimhae City is a narrow favorite due to fresher form and superior defensive metrics: in their last 5 matches they scored 9 goals with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, while Ansan scored 4 goals with 2 wins and 3 losses. The defensive gap is clear – Ansan concedes 2.00 goals per home match, whereas Gimhae concedes 1.56 on the road; the visitors also have 22% clean sheets compared to the hosts’ 0%. Offensively Ansan at home averages 1.00 goals per game, xG 1.24 and 3.91 shots on target from 9.45 total shots, yet their 11% conversion rate has not translated into recent effectiveness. Gimhae away posts 0.89 goals per game, xG 1.15 and 3.67 shots on target, and have failed to score in only 11% of away matches versus 18% of Ansan’s home matches without a goal, which increases the visitors’ probability of scoring. Considering the 9 away goals in the last 5 matches, the better goals-against average 1.56 vs 2.00 and 1.6 points per game in the last 5 versus Ansan’s 1.2, I tip Gimhae to win (2) and propose the probability distribution: home 25%, draw 30%, away 45%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal statistics strongly favor BTTS: Ansan has 75% home matches with both teams scoring, Gimhae has 67% such away matches, and the league BTTS average is 63%. The hosts concede 2.5 goals per match on average this season and have no clean sheets at home (0% clean sheets), while Gimhae has scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 avg), increasing the likelihood that the visitors will find the net. Ansan produces xG 1.33 per match but actually scores only 0.75 goals and has a low shot conversion of 7%, whereas Gimhae has xG 1.15 and a higher conversion of 11%, so despite finishing issues the chances for goals from both sides remain high. In the short term Ansan has only 40% BTTS in the last 5 matches, and Gimhae 80%, and Ansan concedes 2.2 goals on average in the last 5 (11 conceded), which is a strong signal that the hosts are vulnerable to conceding. Considering the seasonal 75%/67% BTTS, Ansan’s lack of clean sheets and Gimhae’s 1.8 goals per match over the last 5, I recommend a bet on BTTS (Yes) as the more probable outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Aggregate xG and defensive metrics point to a goal-heavy game: Ansan’s attacking xG is 1.33, Gimhae’s attacking xG is 1.15, and xG against both teams is 1.86, yielding expected ~1.60 goals for the home side and ~1.50 for the visitors (total ~3.10). Seasonal rates confirm this trend — Over 1.5 occurs in 88% of Ansan’s matches and 78% of Gimhae’s, and both teams show high BTTS: 75% and 67%. Over 2.5 is more mixed: Ansan has 75% of matches with >2.5 goals, but Gimhae only 33%, so I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at roughly 66% — additionally Ansan concedes on average 2.5 goals per match, which raises the risk of goals. Over 3.5 looks weaker — seasonally 38% for the home side and 22% for the visitors, hence an assessment of Over 3.5 at about 32%. The strongest signal from the data is therefore Over 1.5 (high 88%/78%, total xG ~3.1 and BTTS above 67%), so I recommend staking on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a half-time draw and an away win after full-time (X/2). I expect a low-scoring first half: hosts average 0.25 goals in the first half, visitors 0.11, and half-time draws occur in 38% (hosts) and 33% (visitors) of matches, favoring a goalless or low-goals first half. After the break Gimhae City should hold the advantage — they collected 11 points in second halves versus Ansan’s 3, with average second-half points of 1.22 (away) vs 0.38 (home); visitors score on average 0.78 goals in the second half, while hosts concede on average 1.88. Additionally, visitors have 22% wins this season versus 0% for the hosts and better shot conversion 11% vs 7%, and Ansan concede as many as 11 goals in minutes 76–90, which increases the likelihood of an away turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
6Shots9
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
4Shots on target4
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1.11xG1.2
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1Corners4
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
60Dangerous attacks48
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
12Fouls12
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
3Cards2
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1Goals scored / match0.82
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1.89Goals conceded / match2
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
46%Average possession46%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
3.67Shots on target / match3.47
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.56Shots per match9.41
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
3.67Shots on target3.47
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
11.7%Shot conversion8.8%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
46%Possession46%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1.13xG for1.23
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
2.08xG against1.86
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

Shooting quality

Ansan Greeners: BalancedGimhae City: Balanced
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
Accuracy (shots on target)43%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ansan Greeners is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 pts / match - Gimhae City

Ansan Greeners
LLWLW
Season result split
28% W11% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-11
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 2.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Gimhae City
LDLWD
Season result split
12% W24% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-11
0.59 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ansan Greeners is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 0.82 goals / match - Gimhae City

Ansan Greeners is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.89 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 2 goals / match - Gimhae City

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

Gimhae City scoring profile: very strong

Gimhae City scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

18Goals scored (season)14
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
34Goals conceded (season)34
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
2.89Average goals in match2.82
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal82%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
17%2 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
6%3 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
6%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal88%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
56%2 goals59%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
33%3 goals35%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
6%4 goals18%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time6%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
0%Scored in both halves0%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
60%BTTS - last 580%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ansan Greeners is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 0.71 pts / match - Gimhae City

Ansan Greeners - half-time state
17% leading44% draw39% trailing
Gimhae City - half-time state
12% leading35% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per match (1st half)0.71
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.18
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1.22Average goals (1st half)0.88
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
39%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
56%No goal before half-time82%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)0.82
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)1.29
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.94
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
50%Clean sheet after half-time24%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City
72%No goal after half-time35%
Ansan GreenersGimhae City

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

22% W28% R50% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimhae City - second-half results

12% W47% R41% P
12
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gimhae City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimhae City
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
7
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.95
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Gimhae City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Ansan GreenersLigaGimhae City
Average goals in match 2.892.81 2.82
Both teams scored 61%63% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%56% 53%
Clean sheets 11%22% 12%
Goal before half-time 78%72% 71%
Goal after half-time 72%78% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ansan GreenersGoalHyun-Soo Jang
  2. Gimhae CityGoalJe-Wook WooAssist: Uk-hyeon Hong
  3. Gimhae CityYellow cardHyun-Jin Seol
  4. Gimhae CityGoalJe-Wook Woo
  5. Ansan GreenersYellow cardJung-Hyun Kim
  6. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Milan ObradovićOff: Ji-Hoon Cho
  7. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Rúben Daniel Fonseca MacedoOff: Hyun-Jin Seol
  8. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Seung-Jae LeeOff: Je-Wook Woo
  9. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Dong-Hyun KangOff: Ji-Min Im
  10. Gimhae CityYellow cardJae-Hyun Park
  11. Ansan GreenersYellow cardJae-Hwan Lee
  12. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Hyo-jun LeeOff: Jung-Hyun Kim
  13. Ansan GreenersYellow cardDong-Hyun Kang

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ansan Greeners 1 - 0 - 0 Gimhae City. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City?

The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 2:2 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City?

Ansan Greeners score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.82. The K League 2 average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 71% of Gimhae City's.

What form are Ansan Greeners and Gimhae City in?

Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimhae City 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ansan Greeners vs Gimhae City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.