South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ansan Greeners play Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 16 May 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Ansan Greeners: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ansan Greeners 65%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 65%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.18. Ansan Greeners: 8.9 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.

Match halves

Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.53. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Match description

I predict an away win (Gimpo Citizen). On the road Gimpo averages 11.7 shots and 4.4 shots on target per match and scores 1.3 goals, while Ansan at home averages only 7.43 shots and 3.0 on target and scores 1.0 goal. Defensively the gap is significant: Ansan concedes 2.0 goals at home on average and has no clean sheets (0%), whereas Gimpo concedes 1.1 goals away and has a 30% clean sheet rate. xG also favors the visitors — Gimpo’s average xG is 1.5 versus opponents’ xG 1.08 (net +0.42), while Ansan at home has xG 1.04 against opponents’ xG 1.76 (net -0.72), indicating higher-quality chances for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Gimpo scored 6 and conceded 6 (1W, 3D, 1L), and Ansan has 4 scored and 7 conceded (2W, 0D, 3L); based on these figures I assign a 55% probability to Gimpo win, 30% to a draw and 15% to an Ansan win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
19Shots7
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
4Shots on target2
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
2.06xG0.87
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
6Corners2
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
81Dangerous attacks39
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
7Fouls18
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1Cards3
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1Goals scored / match1.18
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
2Goals conceded / match1.12
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
46%Average possession50%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
3.82Shots on target / match4
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.94Shots per match12.29
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
3.82Shots on target4
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
11.2%Shot conversion9.6%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
46%Possession50%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.18xG for1.52
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
2.07xG against1.27
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Ansan Greeners: BalancedGimpo Citizen: Balanced
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)43%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimpo Citizen is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners
LLLWL
Season result split
24% W12% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-11
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.18 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 79% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)20
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
34Goals conceded (season)19
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
3Average goals in match2.29
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
15Goals conceded (last 5)8
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal76%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
18%2 goals29%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
6%3 goals12%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
6%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal71%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
59%2 goals35%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
35%3 goals6%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
6%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0%Scored in both halves24%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
60%BTTS - last 560%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners - half-time state
18% leading41% draw41% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per match (1st half)1.24
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.06
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
35%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
53%No goal before half-time59%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
47%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
76%No goal after half-time41%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

18% W29% R53% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Ansan GreenersLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 3.002.75 2.29
Both teams scored 65%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%56% 35%
Clean sheets 6%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 82%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ansan Greeners 0 - 2 - 1 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Gimpo Citizen FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
2 : 2
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
0 : 2
Gimpo Citizen FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 0:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 0, Gimpo Citizen won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?

Ansan Greeners score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 53% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Ansan Greeners and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?

The statistical background for Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.