Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics
Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ansan Greeners played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Ansan Greeners: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ansan Greeners scores 1.18 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.30 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ansan Greeners 73%, Gimpo Citizen 60%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 55%, Gimpo Citizen 40%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.08. Ansan Greeners: 8.0 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 11.7.
Match halves
Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (Gimpo Citizen). On the road Gimpo averages 11.7 shots and 4.4 shots on target per match and scores 1.3 goals, while Ansan at home averages only 7.43 shots and 3.0 on target and scores 1.0 goal. Defensively the gap is significant: Ansan concedes 2.0 goals at home on average and has no clean sheets (0%), whereas Gimpo concedes 1.1 goals away and has a 30% clean sheet rate. xG also favors the visitors — Gimpo’s average xG is 1.5 versus opponents’ xG 1.08 (net +0.42), while Ansan at home has xG 1.04 against opponents’ xG 1.76 (net -0.72), indicating higher-quality chances for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Gimpo scored 6 and conceded 6 (1W, 3D, 1L), and Ansan has 4 scored and 7 conceded (2W, 0D, 3L); based on these figures I assign a 55% probability to Gimpo win, 30% to a draw and 15% to an Ansan win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis indicates that the Both Teams To Score scenario (BTTS) is more likely — the league BTTS rate is 61%. Gimpo (away) has a seasonal BTTS of 60% and BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, scoring on average 1.2 goals (6 in 5) and recording xG 1.14 over the last 5, which indicates a real threat to the opponent’s goal. Ansan (home) has BTTS in 40% of their last 5 and scores on average 0.8 goals (4 in 5), but concedes on average 1.4 goals (7 in 5) and has xG against 1.8, meaning they often allow high-quality chances. Both teams have 13 goals scored this season, but Ansan has conceded 18 compared to Gimpo’s 11, which further increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Therefore, supported by the league’s 61%, the away form (60% seasonally and 80% in the last 5) and Ansan’s higher xG against, I choose BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Gimpo shows a stronger attack: seasonally 1.3 goals scored and xG 1.5 per match, with an average of 11.7 shots and 4.4 on target. Ansan has season-long gaps in data, so I look at the last 5 matches — Ansan scored 4 goals in the last 5 (0.8 per match) with xG 0.79 and conceded 7 goals (1.4 per match), with xG against of 1.8. Averaging Ansan’s attack (xG 0.79) and Gimpo’s defense (xG against 1.0 in the last 5) yields an expected ~0.90 goals for Ansan, and combining Gimpo’s attack (seasonal xG 1.5) with Ansan’s defense (xG against 1.8) gives ~1.65 for Gimpo, totaling 2.55. Based on this the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high probability, ~88%); Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~58%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%). Additionally, Gimpo has had 90% of games this season with at least one goal and 60% of games where both teams scored, which supports the scenario of at least two goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Gimpo draws at half-time in 60% of matches and leads at the break in only 20% of games, so the most likely half-time score is a draw. Over the full season Gimpo wins 30% of matches, draws 50% and loses 20%, which shifts the probability toward a full-time draw. After the break Gimpo scores on average 0.8 goals and concedes 0.6, and in 90% of their matches at least one goal is scored in the second half, indicating high second-half activity but often resulting in shared points. Gimpo’s xG is 1.5 versus an xG against of 1.08, suggesting a moderate offensive edge without decisive dominance, and the lack of home data for Ansan (goals average 0.0/0.0) means the strongest signal comes from Gimpo’s trends and points toward selecting X/X (draw at half-time and draw at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ansan Greeners | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gimpo Citizen is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.3 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Gimpo Citizen is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.64 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.1 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Ansan Greeners scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).
Gimpo Citizen scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ansan Greeners
Over / Under - Gimpo Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gimpo Citizen is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ansan Greeners
Gimpo Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Ansan Greeners | Liga | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.82 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 55% | 56% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 23% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 73% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Ansan Greeners 0 - 2 - 1 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 0:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Gimpo Citizen?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 0, Gimpo Citizen won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?
Ansan Greeners score 1.18 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.30. The K League 2 average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 60% of Gimpo Citizen's.
What form are Ansan Greeners and Gimpo Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?
The statistical background for Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


