South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ansan Greeners played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Ansan Greeners: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ansan Greeners scores 1.18 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.30 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ansan Greeners 73%, Gimpo Citizen 60%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 55%, Gimpo Citizen 40%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.08. Ansan Greeners: 8.0 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 11.7.

Match halves

Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (Gimpo Citizen). On the road Gimpo averages 11.7 shots and 4.4 shots on target per match and scores 1.3 goals, while Ansan at home averages only 7.43 shots and 3.0 on target and scores 1.0 goal. Defensively the gap is significant: Ansan concedes 2.0 goals at home on average and has no clean sheets (0%), whereas Gimpo concedes 1.1 goals away and has a 30% clean sheet rate. xG also favors the visitors — Gimpo’s average xG is 1.5 versus opponents’ xG 1.08 (net +0.42), while Ansan at home has xG 1.04 against opponents’ xG 1.76 (net -0.72), indicating higher-quality chances for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Gimpo scored 6 and conceded 6 (1W, 3D, 1L), and Ansan has 4 scored and 7 conceded (2W, 0D, 3L); based on these figures I assign a 55% probability to Gimpo win, 30% to a draw and 15% to an Ansan win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis indicates that the Both Teams To Score scenario (BTTS) is more likely — the league BTTS rate is 61%. Gimpo (away) has a seasonal BTTS of 60% and BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, scoring on average 1.2 goals (6 in 5) and recording xG 1.14 over the last 5, which indicates a real threat to the opponent’s goal. Ansan (home) has BTTS in 40% of their last 5 and scores on average 0.8 goals (4 in 5), but concedes on average 1.4 goals (7 in 5) and has xG against 1.8, meaning they often allow high-quality chances. Both teams have 13 goals scored this season, but Ansan has conceded 18 compared to Gimpo’s 11, which further increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Therefore, supported by the league’s 61%, the away form (60% seasonally and 80% in the last 5) and Ansan’s higher xG against, I choose BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Gimpo shows a stronger attack: seasonally 1.3 goals scored and xG 1.5 per match, with an average of 11.7 shots and 4.4 on target. Ansan has season-long gaps in data, so I look at the last 5 matches — Ansan scored 4 goals in the last 5 (0.8 per match) with xG 0.79 and conceded 7 goals (1.4 per match), with xG against of 1.8. Averaging Ansan’s attack (xG 0.79) and Gimpo’s defense (xG against 1.0 in the last 5) yields an expected ~0.90 goals for Ansan, and combining Gimpo’s attack (seasonal xG 1.5) with Ansan’s defense (xG against 1.8) gives ~1.65 for Gimpo, totaling 2.55. Based on this the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high probability, ~88%); Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~58%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%). Additionally, Gimpo has had 90% of games this season with at least one goal and 60% of games where both teams scored, which supports the scenario of at least two goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Gimpo draws at half-time in 60% of matches and leads at the break in only 20% of games, so the most likely half-time score is a draw. Over the full season Gimpo wins 30% of matches, draws 50% and loses 20%, which shifts the probability toward a full-time draw. After the break Gimpo scores on average 0.8 goals and concedes 0.6, and in 90% of their matches at least one goal is scored in the second half, indicating high second-half activity but often resulting in shared points. Gimpo’s xG is 1.5 versus an xG against of 1.08, suggesting a moderate offensive edge without decisive dominance, and the lack of home data for Ansan (goals average 0.0/0.0) means the strongest signal comes from Gimpo’s trends and points toward selecting X/X (draw at half-time and draw at full-time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
19Shots7
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
4Shots on target2
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
2.06xG0.87
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
6Corners2
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
81Dangerous attacks39
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
7Fouls18
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1Cards3
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.18Goals scored / match1.3
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.64Goals conceded / match1.1
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
47%Average possession50%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
3.36Shots on target / match4.4
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match11.7
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
3.36Shots on target4.4
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
14.8%Shot conversion11.1%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
47%Possession50%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.08xG for1.5
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.89xG against1.08
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Ansan Greeners: Counter-attackingGimpo Citizen: Balanced
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)42%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ansan Greeners
WLWLL
Season result split
27% W18% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.79Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Gimpo Citizen
WDDLD
Season result split
30% W50% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.3 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.1 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

13Goals scored (season)13
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
18Goals conceded (season)11
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
2.82Average goals in match2.4
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal80%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
18%2 goals30%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
9%3 goals20%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
9%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal70%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
55%2 goals30%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
18%3 goals10%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time30%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves10%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0%Scored in both halves30%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
40%BTTS - last 580%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners - half-time state
18% leading45% draw36% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.2
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.27Average goals (1st half)1
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
36%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
45%No goal before half-time60%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.91Points per match (2nd half)1.7
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
55%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen
73%No goal after half-time30%
Ansan GreenersGimpo Citizen

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

18% W36% R45% P
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

50% W20% R30% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.61
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Ansan GreenersLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.822.70 2.40
Both teams scored 73%62% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%56% 40%
Clean sheets 9%23% 30%
Goal before half-time 82%78% 60%
Goal after half-time 64%73% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimpo CitizenGoalLuis Fabián Mina Zapata
  2. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardBu-Seong Jang
  3. Gimpo CitizenRed cardDjalma Celestino Evaristo
  4. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Seong-Jun KimOff: Do-Hyuk Kim
  5. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Hyo-jun LeeOff: Ji-Min Im
  6. Ansan GreenersYellow cardDong-Hyun Kang
  7. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Wu JeongOff: Ji-Hoon Cho
  8. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Min-Sik KimOff: Bu-Seong Jang
  9. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Sung-Bum ChoiOff: Luis Fabián Mina Zapata
  10. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Chan-Hyung LeeOff: Hak-Min Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ansan Greeners 0 - 2 - 1 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Gimpo Citizen FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
2 : 2
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
0 : 2
Gimpo Citizen FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 0:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 0, Gimpo Citizen won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?

Ansan Greeners score 1.18 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.30. The K League 2 average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 60% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Ansan Greeners and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen?

The statistical background for Ansan Greeners vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.