South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam: match statistics

Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
145%(2.71)
X30%(3.35)
225%(2.39)

Ansan Greeners, despite poor home form (0% wins at home), demonstrate greater offensive output, averaging 1 goal per home game from 10 shots with 55% possession. Gyeongnam display catastrophic away form – 100% losses, 0 goals scored on the road and merely 1 shot on target per match on average. The difference in xG (1.38 vs 0.9) combined with the visitors' complete ineffectiveness away from home (FTS% 100%) favors the hosts. Both teams have defensive issues, suggesting a draw is possible; however, Ansan Greeners' offensive edge at home and Gyeongnam's total helplessness away give the hosts a realistic chance to break their home streak. The visitors' better points per game in the last 5 matches overall (1.4 vs 0.8 PPG) does not offset their total impotence in away fixtures.

Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ansan Greeners play Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 28 March 2026 at 08:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Ansan Greeners: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Gyeongnam: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Gyeongnam scores 1.47 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ansan Greeners 65%, Gyeongnam 65%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 65%, Gyeongnam 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gyeongnam has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.18. Ansan Greeners: 8.9 shots per match, Gyeongnam: 11.7.

Match halves

Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.53. Gyeongnam: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 1-1-2. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.

Match description

Ansan Greeners, despite poor home form (0% wins at home), demonstrate greater offensive output, averaging 1 goal per home game from 10 shots with 55% possession. Gyeongnam display catastrophic away form – 100% losses, 0 goals scored on the road and merely 1 shot on target per match on average. The difference in xG (1.38 vs 0.9) combined with the visitors' complete ineffectiveness away from home (FTS% 100%) favors the hosts. Both teams have defensive issues, suggesting a draw is possible; however, Ansan Greeners' offensive edge at home and Gyeongnam's total helplessness away give the hosts a realistic chance to break their home streak. The visitors' better points per game in the last 5 matches overall (1.4 vs 0.8 PPG) does not offset their total impotence in away fixtures.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
7Shots15
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
2Shots on target3
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0.8xG1.58
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
2Corners0
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
28Dangerous attacks57
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
13Fouls14
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1Cards3
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1Goals scored / match1.47
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
2Goals conceded / match1.47
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
46%Average possession50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
3.82Shots on target / match3.71
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.94Shots per match11.71
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
3.82Shots on target3.71
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
11.2%Shot conversion12.6%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
46%Possession50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.18xG for1.37
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
2.07xG against1.25
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Shooting quality

Ansan Greeners: BalancedGyeongnam: Balanced
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
Accuracy (shots on target)43%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gyeongnam is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.6 pts / match - Gyeongnam

Ansan Greeners
LLLWL
Season result split
24% W12% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-11
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Gyeongnam
LDWDW
Season result split
35% W29% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-6
1.35 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gyeongnam is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam

Gyeongnam is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

Gyeongnam scoring profile: very strong

Gyeongnam scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)25
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
34Goals conceded (season)25
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
3Average goals in match2.94
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
4Goals scored (last 5)10
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
15Goals conceded (last 5)6
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal76%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
18%2 goals41%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
6%3 goals18%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
6%4 goals6%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal88%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
59%2 goals47%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
35%3 goals6%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
6%4 goals6%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0%Scored in both halves29%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
60%BTTS - last 560%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gyeongnam is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 pts / match - Gyeongnam

Ansan Greeners - half-time state
18% leading41% draw41% trailing
Gyeongnam - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per match (1st half)1
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.59
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.29
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
35%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
53%No goal before half-time53%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
76%No goal after half-time41%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

18% W29% R53% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gyeongnam - second-half results

29% W41% R29% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gyeongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
8
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Ansan GreenersLigaGyeongnam
Average goals in match 3.002.75 2.94
Both teams scored 65%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%56% 53%
Clean sheets 6%24% 12%
Goal before half-time 82%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Ansan Greeners 1 - 1 - 2 Gyeongnam. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Gyeongnam
5 : 0
Ansan Greeners
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
1 : 0
Gyeongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam?

The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 1:1 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Gyeongnam?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 1, Gyeongnam won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam?

Ansan Greeners score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.47. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 65% of Gyeongnam's.

What form are Ansan Greeners and Gyeongnam in?

Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Gyeongnam 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.