South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam: match statistics

Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
145%(2.71)
X30%(3.35)
225%(2.39)

Ansan Greeners, despite poor home form (0% wins at home), demonstrate greater offensive output, averaging 1 goal per home game from 10 shots with 55% possession. Gyeongnam display catastrophic away form – 100% losses, 0 goals scored on the road and merely 1 shot on target per match on average. The difference in xG (1.38 vs 0.9) combined with the visitors' complete ineffectiveness away from home (FTS% 100%) favors the hosts. Both teams have defensive issues, suggesting a draw is possible; however, Ansan Greeners' offensive edge at home and Gyeongnam's total helplessness away give the hosts a realistic chance to break their home streak. The visitors' better points per game in the last 5 matches overall (1.4 vs 0.8 PPG) does not offset their total impotence in away fixtures.

Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ansan Greeners played Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Ansan Greeners: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Gyeongnam: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ansan Greeners scores 1.75 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Gyeongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ansan Greeners 100%, Gyeongnam 50%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 75%, Gyeongnam 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Ansan Greeners has higher xG: 1.47 vs 0.84. Ansan Greeners: 11.5 shots per match, Gyeongnam: 7.3.

Match halves

Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.25. Gyeongnam: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Ansan Greeners: 61-75 (2 goals). Gyeongnam: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ansan Greeners, despite poor home form (0% wins at home), demonstrate greater offensive output, averaging 1 goal per home game from 10 shots with 55% possession. Gyeongnam display catastrophic away form – 100% losses, 0 goals scored on the road and merely 1 shot on target per match on average. The difference in xG (1.38 vs 0.9) combined with the visitors' complete ineffectiveness away from home (FTS% 100%) favors the hosts. Both teams have defensive issues, suggesting a draw is possible; however, Ansan Greeners' offensive edge at home and Gyeongnam's total helplessness away give the hosts a realistic chance to break their home streak. The visitors' better points per game in the last 5 matches overall (1.4 vs 0.8 PPG) does not offset their total impotence in away fixtures.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Ansan has a high BTTS rate this season (67%) and an even higher one in their last 5 matches (80%), indicating frequent matches with goals from both sides. The key factor is the hosts' weak defensive profile: conceding an average of 2.0 goals per match this season and a concerning 2.6 in the last 5 games, with a rising xG against (2.08 in L5). Gyeongnam has been scoring an average of 1.2 goals in their recent 5 matches and generates decent xG (1.09), which against Ansan's defense significantly increases the likelihood of them finding the net. Conversely, Ansan should find a way to score as they are regular scorers (1.33 per match this season; 1.4 in L5) and have improved their creativity in L5 (xG for 1.31) against an opponent conceding around 1.4 goals in their last 5. Although Gyeongnam's seasonal BTTS/FTS figures are extreme (0% BTTS, 100% FTS), more recent data from their latest matches and the high league goal average (3.06; BTTS 66%) strongly support the scenario of goals from both teams.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The league's average goals per game is high (3.06), and Ansan clearly has defensive issues: conceding 2.0 goals per match this season and as many as 2.6 in the last 5 games (xGA last5: 2.08). This supports the scenario where Gyeongnam will add their goal, despite a moderate creative profile (xG for: 0.90; 7.0 shots; 1.0 on target). On the other hand, Ansan does not generate high xG over the season (0.82), but in the last 5 matches they have increased their output (xG for last5: 1.31) and often played high-scoring games (Over 2.5 last5: 80%, BTTS last5: 80%). At the same time, Gyeongnam's seasonal data suggests greater variability and potentially lower efficiency (FTS 100%, Under 2.5: 100%), which reduces confidence in high lines. Therefore, the most stable aggregate signal is exceeding 1.5 goals, with a projected total of 2.55 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Data from the last 5 matches clearly indicates Gyeongnam's advantage before the break: Ansan was losing at HT in 80% of matches, while Gyeongnam held a lead at the break in 40% of them (HTPPG 0.2 vs 1.4). Ansan also displays weak first-half defense (conceding an average of 1.6 goals by HT in last5), whereas Gyeongnam concedes only 0.6 in this period and keeps a clean sheet until half-time 60% of the time. In overall match terms, Ansan concedes heavily (2.6 goals per match in last5; seasonally 2.0), which increases the probability of the visitors maintaining their lead after the sides change. Furthermore, the points form favors the visitors (PPG last5: 1.4 vs 0.8), and with similar xG against (1.41 for both), Gyeongnam's more stable defense should tip the final result in their favor. The risk lies in Gyeongnam's seasonal inefficiency (FTS 100% and 0.0 goals/match in seasonal data), but last5 already shows 1.2 goals/match, so the 2/2 scenario remains the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
7Shots15
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
2Shots on target3
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0.8xG1.58
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
2Corners0
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
28Dangerous attacks57
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
13Fouls14
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1Cards3
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match1
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.75Goals conceded / match1.75
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
49%Average possession43%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
5.5Shots on target / match2.25
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match7.25
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
5.5Shots on target2.25
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
15.2%Shot conversion13.8%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
49%Possession43%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.47xG for0.84
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.95xG against1.41
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Shooting quality

Ansan Greeners: Efficient finishingGyeongnam: Counter-attacking
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
Accuracy (shots on target)48%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ansan Greeners
WLLD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 75%
Gyeongnam
LLDW
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.84Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ansan Greeners is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 goals / match - Gyeongnam

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Gyeongnam scoring profile: very strong

Gyeongnam scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)4
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
7Goals conceded (season)7
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
3.5Average goals in match2.75
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
7Goals scored (last 5)4
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
25%2 goals25%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
25%3 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
25%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
50%2 goals50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
25%3 goals25%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0%4 goals25%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0%Scored in both halves25%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
100%BTTS - last 550%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gyeongnam is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.25 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 pts / match - Gyeongnam

Ansan Greeners - half-time state
0% leading25% draw75% trailing
Gyeongnam - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.25Points per match (1st half)1
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.75Average goals (1st half)1
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
50%No goal before half-time75%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
75%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam
50%No goal after half-time25%
Ansan GreenersGyeongnam

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
1
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.25
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gyeongnam - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.251.25
Goals scored / match0.51.3
Goals conceded / match1.30.5
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals25%50%
Clean sheet0%75%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 25% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gyeongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Ansan GreenersLigaGyeongnam
Average goals in match 3.502.94 2.75
Both teams scored 100%62% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%59% 50%
Clean sheets 0%22% 25%
Goal before half-time 100%85% 75%
Goal after half-time 50%74% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.53
Away goals / match
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-9%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GyeongnamGoalKi-Jong Won
  2. Ansan GreenersGoalMachop CholAssist: Dong-Hyun Kang
  3. GyeongnamYellow cardKi-Jong Won
  4. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Jin-Hyuk ChoOff: Ki-Pyo Kwon
  5. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Jun-Hyeok ParkOff: Hyeon-Wu Jeong
  6. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Oh KimOff: Sun-Ho Kim
  7. GyeongnamYellow cardMin-su Jeon
  8. GyeongnamYellow cardHa-Min Kim
  9. Ansan GreenersYellow cardKyu-Min Park
  10. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Gyu-Baeg LeeOff: Hyeong-Won Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ansan Greeners 1 - 1 - 1 Gyeongnam. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Gyeongnam FC
1 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
1 : 0
Gyeongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam?

The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 1:1 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Gyeongnam?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 1, Gyeongnam won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam?

Ansan Greeners score 1.75 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 50% of Gyeongnam's.

What form are Ansan Greeners and Gyeongnam in?

Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Gyeongnam 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Gyeongnam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.