Anyang vs Gangwon: match statistics
Anyang vs Gangwon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Anyang played Gangwon in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Anyang Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Anyang: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Gangwon: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Anyang scores 1.37 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Gangwon scores 1.26 and concedes 0.63. League average: 2.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Anyang 74%, Gangwon 42%. Over 2.5: Anyang 37%, Gangwon 26%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 40%.
xG, shots and style
Gangwon has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.27. Anyang: 9.7 shots per match, Gangwon: 13.6.
Match halves
Anyang: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79. Gangwon: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Anyang: 46-60 (6 goals). Gangwon: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.33 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 40%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Gangwon — they sit 2nd in the table versus Anyang’s 7th and have a record of 8-8-3 compared to the home side’s 6-9-4. The visitors’ main advantage is defense: Gangwon concedes an average of 0.6 goals away, has 60% clean sheets on the road and only 2 goals conceded in the last 5 matches, whereas Anyang at home concedes 1.33 goals, has no clean sheets and conceded 7 goals in their last five. In chance creation Gangwon dominate both volume and quality — 12.1 average shots and 4 on target per game and xG 1.55 away versus Anyang’s 8.89 shots, 3.11 on target and xG 1.14 at home. Anyang have a higher finishing efficiency (conversion 13% at home vs 8% away) and scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches versus 7 for Gangwon, but the visitors failed to score in 40% of their away matches while the hosts were goalless in 22% of home games. Considering the edge in chance quality (xG 1.55 vs 1.14), superior defense and a slightly higher recent points average over the last 5 matches (2.2 vs 2.0), I assign Gangwon a 55% chance to win, 27% for a draw and 18% for Anyang.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Anyang has a seasonal BTTS rate of 56% and BTTS in the last 5 matches was 80%, with an average of 1.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded in those five games. Gangwon has a seasonal BTTS of 30% and keeps a clean sheet in 60% of away matches; in the last 5 rounds they averaged 1.4 goals scored and 0.4 goals conceded. However, xG indicates both teams create quality chances: Anyang has an attacking xG of 1.88 versus Gangwon’s average xG conceded of 1.29, while Gangwon has an attacking xG of 1.55 versus Anyang’s average xG conceded of 0.95. Anyang averages 4.89 shots on target versus Gangwon’s 4.0, and seasonal goals per game are 1.56 for Anyang vs 1.0 for Gangwon, indicating a home attacking advantage. Considering Anyang’s superiority in chance creation (xG 1.88, 4.89 shots on target) and the fact that Gangwon seasonally concedes fewer goals (0.6) than their xG against (1.29) suggests, I select the Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast indicates about a 78% chance of Over 1.5 goals, based on a combined xG of 2.84 (1.59 for Anyang, 1.25 for Gangwon). Anyang at home averages 1.56 goals, generates 1.88 xG and records 15 shots (4.89 on target) with a 10% conversion rate, while Gangwon away averages 1.00 goal, 1.55 xG and 12.1 shots (4.0 on target) with an 8% conversion — giving the hosts an edge in chance creation. Gangwon formally concedes 0.6 goals on average this season, but xG against is 1.29, meaning opponents create higher-quality chances than the official goals-against figure suggests, which increases the risk of more goals. Seasonally Anyang has 100% of home matches Over 1.5 goals and Gangwon 50%; meanwhile seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 22%/30% (home/away), so Over 2.5 is less certain (~54%) and Over 3.5 even less (~32%). As a result, the strongest and safest signal from the data is to back Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Anyang has a clear advantage in quality of chances: home xG 1.88 versus Gangwon 1.55, and average goals 1.56 vs 1.00, while also conceding a lower xG against (0.95 vs 1.29). First-half metrics are balanced — Anyang averages 0.78 goals at the break and Gangwon 0.60, yet the visitors led at half-time in 4 matches (40%) compared to 3 (33%) for Anyang; in the last five fixtures Gangwon average 1.2 goals by half-time vs 0.8 for the home side. After the break Anyang’s superiority becomes evident: the home team average 0.78 goals in second halves versus 0.40 for the visitors, and in the last five matches Anyang averaged 1.0 second-half goals vs 0.2 for Gangwon, indicating an ability to execute a turnaround. For these reasons the strongest HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1) — I assign this the highest probability; alternatively 1/1 (home leads at the break and maintains it) and draw/full-time draw (X/X) are the next most realistic options.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Anyang | Gangwon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gangwon is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Anyang · 2.2 pts / match - Gangwon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Anyang is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.37 goals / match - Anyang · 1.26 goals / match - Gangwon
Gangwon is 84% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - Anyang · 0.63 goals / match - Gangwon
Anyang scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Gangwon keeps a clean sheet in 53% (10 of 19 matches).
Gangwon scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Anyang
Over / Under - Gangwon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Anyang - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gangwon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Anyang
Gangwon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Anyang | Liga | Gangwon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.53 | 2.33 | ▼ 1.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 51% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 40% | ▼ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 30% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 64% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 73% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Anyang 2 - 2 - 0 Gangwon. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Anyang vs Gangwon?
The K League 1 match finished Anyang 2:1 Gangwon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Anyang and Gangwon?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Anyang won 2, Gangwon won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Anyang vs Gangwon?
Anyang score 1.37 goals per game on average and Gangwon 1.26. The K League 1 average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Anyang's matches and 42% of Gangwon's.
What form are Anyang and Gangwon in?
Over the last 5 games Anyang have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Gangwon 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Anyang vs Gangwon?
The statistical background for Anyang vs Gangwon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


