Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 31 October 2026

APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion: match statistics

APEA crest
APEA
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Ethnikos Latsion crest
Ethnikos Latsion
135%(1.97)
X35%(3.40)
230%(3.32)

The match shapes up to be a tightly contested clash between two bottom-table sides struggling for form. APEA holds a poor home record with just a 14% win rate and a -6 goal difference, conceding an average of 2 goals per game. Ethnikos Latsion performs equally poorly on the road (29% win rate, -5 GD), yet boasts a superior shot conversion rate (10% vs 4%) and generates more shots on target (4.67 vs 3.8). Both teams share an identical clean sheet percentage (29%) and similar defensive frailties, suggesting goals are likely. Recent form over the last 5 matches is dismal for both squads (APEA: 1 point/match, Ethnikos: 0.4 points/match), pointing towards a draw as the safest scenario. The hosts' slight edge derives solely from home advantage, as their underlying statistics offer no guarantee of victory.

APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

APEA played Ethnikos Latsion in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 3 January 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

APEA: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ethnikos Latsion: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

APEA scores 1.23 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Ethnikos Latsion scores 0.85 and concedes 1.77. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: APEA 54%, Ethnikos Latsion 46%. Over 2.5: APEA 69%, Ethnikos Latsion 31%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

APEA has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.15. APEA: 8.4 shots per match, Ethnikos Latsion: 8.1.

Match halves

APEA: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.69. Ethnikos Latsion: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

APEA: 46-60 (4 goals). Ethnikos Latsion: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match shapes up to be a tightly contested clash between two bottom-table sides struggling for form. APEA holds a poor home record with just a 14% win rate and a -6 goal difference, conceding an average of 2 goals per game. Ethnikos Latsion performs equally poorly on the road (29% win rate, -5 GD), yet boasts a superior shot conversion rate (10% vs 4%) and generates more shots on target (4.67 vs 3.8). Both teams share an identical clean sheet percentage (29%) and similar defensive frailties, suggesting goals are likely. Recent form over the last 5 matches is dismal for both squads (APEA: 1 point/match, Ethnikos: 0.4 points/match), pointing towards a draw as the safest scenario. The hosts' slight edge derives solely from home advantage, as their underlying statistics offer no guarantee of victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
APEAEthnikos Latsion
12Shots4
APEAEthnikos Latsion
4Shots on target2
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.44xG0.67
APEAEthnikos Latsion
7Corners1
APEAEthnikos Latsion
54Dangerous attacks36
APEAEthnikos Latsion
14Fouls7
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0Cards0
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.23Goals scored / match0.85
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.62Goals conceded / match1.77
APEAEthnikos Latsion
40%Average possession40%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
3.54Shots on target / match3
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.38Shots per match8.08
APEAEthnikos Latsion
3.54Shots on target3
APEAEthnikos Latsion
14.7%Shot conversion10.5%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
40%Possession40%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.4xG for1.15
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.38xG against1.75
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Shooting quality

APEA: Counter-attackingEthnikos Latsion: Balanced
APEAEthnikos Latsion
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APEA is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - APEA · 0.4 pts / match - Ethnikos Latsion

APEA
DLLDW
Season result split
31% W23% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-6
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ethnikos Latsion
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W23% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APEA is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - APEA · 0.85 goals / match - Ethnikos Latsion

APEA is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - APEA · 1.77 goals / match - Ethnikos Latsion

APEA scoring profile: very strong

APEA scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Ethnikos Latsion keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Ethnikos Latsion scoring profile: very strong

Ethnikos Latsion scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

16Goals scored (season)11
APEAEthnikos Latsion
21Goals conceded (season)23
APEAEthnikos Latsion
2.85Average goals in match2.62
APEAEthnikos Latsion
5Goals scored (last 5)4
APEAEthnikos Latsion
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
APEAEthnikos Latsion

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal69%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
38%2 goals15%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
15%3 goals0%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0%4 goals0%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal77%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
46%2 goals54%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
31%3 goals31%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
8%4 goals15%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time31%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
8%BTTS in both halves0%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
31%Scored in both halves0%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
60%BTTS - last 560%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

APEA is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - APEA · 0.85 pts / match - Ethnikos Latsion

APEA - half-time state
23% leading46% draw31% trailing
Ethnikos Latsion - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)0.85
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.46
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.54
APEAEthnikos Latsion
38%Clean sheet before half-time31%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
46%No goal before half-time62%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.23
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
APEAEthnikos Latsion
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
APEAEthnikos Latsion
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.08
APEAEthnikos Latsion
46%Clean sheet after half-time62%
APEAEthnikos Latsion
54%No goal after half-time69%
APEAEthnikos Latsion

APEA - second-half results

31% W38% D31% L
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ethnikos Latsion - second-half results

31% W31% D38% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

APEA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ethnikos Latsion - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

APEA
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
7
16-30
2
3
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Ethnikos Latsion
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
0
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
0
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

APEA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Ethnikos Latsion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

APEALigaEthnikos Latsion
Average goals in match▲ 2.852.50▲ 2.62
Both teams scored▲ 54%48%▼ 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 69%46%▼ 31%
Clean sheets▼ 23%31%▼ 23%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%65%▲ 77%
Goal after half-time• 77%78%▼ 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defence advantage
+-10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?

The Second Division match finished APEA 3:0 Ethnikos Latsion. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?

APEA score 1.23 goals per game on average and Ethnikos Latsion 0.85. The Second Division average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 54% of APEA's matches and 46% of Ethnikos Latsion's.

What form are APEA and Ethnikos Latsion in?

Over the last 5 games APEA have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ethnikos Latsion 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?

The statistical background for APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.