Cyprus - First DivisionNeo GSP (Nicosía (Levkosía))Data current as of 15 October 2026

APOEL vs Nea Salamis: match statistics

APOEL crest
APOEL
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Nea Salamis crest
Nea Salamis

APOEL vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

APOEL played Nea Salamis in First Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Neo GSP (Nicosía (Levkosía)). Final score: 2:1.

Current form

APOEL: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Nea Salamis: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

APOEL scores 2.50 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Nea Salamis scores 2.00 and concedes 2.25. League average: 3.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: APOEL 75%, Nea Salamis 75%. Over 2.5: APOEL 100%, Nea Salamis 100%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

APOEL has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.27. APOEL: 10.3 shots per match, Nea Salamis: 10.8.

Match halves

APOEL: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.75. Nea Salamis: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

APOEL: 76-90+ (4 goals). Nea Salamis: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

APOEL are favourites at home: in their only home match so far, they won 6-0, while Nea Salamis have picked up just 1 point from two away games and conceded an average of 2.5 goals. The hosts average 8 shots on target at home, compared with 4 for the visitors away, and their xG stands at 1.77 versus their opponents' 1.32, pointing to an advantage in chance creation. APOEL also have the edge in possession, averaging 67% at home compared with Nea Salamis' 41% away. However, the hosts' recent form tempers the forecast: they have won 1 of their last 5 matches and conceded 9 goals, while the visitors have won 2 of 5 and scored 12. Even so, APOEL's strong home statistics and Nea Salamis' defensive struggles on the road make a home win the likeliest outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 50% of APOEL’s matches and 100% of Nea Salamis’ fixtures, rising to 60% and 80%, respectively, across their last five appearances. Both teams average 2.0 goals scored per game this season, while conceding 2.0 and 2.5 per match, respectively, which points to goals at both ends. Over their last five matches, APOEL averaged 2.0 goals scored and Nea Salamis 2.4, while conceding an average of 1.8 and 2.0. The case is tempered by APOEL keeping a clean sheet in 50% of its matches; however, Nea Salamis has not recorded a single clean sheet, and both teams have scored in every one of their respective matches. Therefore, a goal from each side looks more likely than a scenario in which at least one team fails to score (BTTS - No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, APOEL averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while Nea Salamis averaged 2.4 and 2.0 respectively, pointing to a game with several goals. At least 3 goals were scored in 80% of APOEL’s last 5 matches and in all 5 of Nea Salamis’ games. However, caution around higher lines is warranted by their attacking xG averages over this period: 1.32 for the home side and 1.27 for the away side, both clearly below their average goals scored. Therefore, Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick: this threshold has been reached in every match played by both teams in the season statistics considered, and the forecast of 3.10 goals gives it a greater margin of safety than the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Nea Salamis led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while APOEL were trailing at half-time in 4 of 5, supporting the case for the visitors to lead at the break. Over this period, the visitors averaged 1.2 goals before half-time, while the hosts conceded 1.4. Holding on to the advantage is not assured: APOEL averaged 1.4 goals scored after the break and conceded just 0.4 across their last 5 matches, while Nea Salamis conceded 1.2 goals in the second half. Despite the risk of a home turnaround, 2/2 remains the single most likely outcome, as the visitors won 2 of their last 5 matches, while APOEL won just 1 of 5. However, the small sample and the hosts’ markedly stronger second-half performances limit confidence in this pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
APOELNea Salamis
16Shots9
APOELNea Salamis
7Shots on target3
APOELNea Salamis
2.13xG1.13
APOELNea Salamis
2Corners2
APOELNea Salamis
86Dangerous attacks48
APOELNea Salamis
9Fouls20
APOELNea Salamis
4Cards1
APOELNea Salamis

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.5Goals scored / match2
APOELNea Salamis
1.75Goals conceded / match2.25
APOELNea Salamis
59%Average possession44%
APOELNea Salamis
5.5Shots on target / match3.5
APOELNea Salamis

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.25Shots per match10.75
APOELNea Salamis
5.5Shots on target3.5
APOELNea Salamis
24.4%Shot conversion18.6%
APOELNea Salamis
59%Possession44%
APOELNea Salamis
1.4xG for1.27
APOELNea Salamis
1.1xG against1.64
APOELNea Salamis

Shooting quality

APOEL: Efficient finishingNea Salamis: Counter-attacking
APOELNea Salamis
Accuracy (shots on target)54%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.57

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APOEL
LWLD
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 100%
Nea Salamis
DLLW
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APOEL is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

2.5 goals / match - APOEL · 2 goals / match - Nea Salamis

APOEL is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.75 goals / match - APOEL · 2.25 goals / match - Nea Salamis

APOEL scoring profile: very strong

APOEL scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while APOEL keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

10Goals scored (season)8
APOELNea Salamis
7Goals conceded (season)9
APOELNea Salamis
4.25Average goals in match4.25
APOELNea Salamis
10Goals scored (last 5)8
APOELNea Salamis
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
APOELNea Salamis

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
APOELNea Salamis
50%2 goals50%
APOELNea Salamis
25%3 goals50%
APOELNea Salamis
25%4 goals0%
APOELNea Salamis

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
APOELNea Salamis
75%2 goals75%
APOELNea Salamis
25%3 goals50%
APOELNea Salamis
0%4 goals25%
APOELNea Salamis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
APOELNea Salamis
0%BTTS in both halves25%
APOELNea Salamis
50%Scored in both halves50%
APOELNea Salamis

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
APOELNea Salamis
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
APOELNea Salamis
75%BTTS - last 575%
APOELNea Salamis

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
APOELNea Salamis
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
APOELNea Salamis
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
APOELNea Salamis

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
APOELNea Salamis
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
APOELNea Salamis
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
APOELNea Salamis

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - APOEL · 1.5 pts / match - Nea Salamis

APOEL - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing
Nea Salamis - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.5
APOELNea Salamis
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.75
APOELNea Salamis
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)1
APOELNea Salamis
2Average goals (1st half)1.75
APOELNea Salamis
25%Clean sheet before half-time25%
APOELNea Salamis
50%No goal before half-time50%
APOELNea Salamis

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1
APOELNea Salamis
1.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
APOELNea Salamis
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
APOELNea Salamis
2.25Average goals (2nd half)2.5
APOELNea Salamis
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
APOELNea Salamis
0%No goal after half-time0%
APOELNea Salamis

APOEL - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

APOEL - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.752.00
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match1.30.5
Average goals in match2.02.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals75%75%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference-2+5
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3
Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.00
Goals scored / match0.81.3
Goals conceded / match1.01.3
Average goals in match1.82.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals25%50%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

APOEL
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.4 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
140%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

APOEL

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

APOELLigaNea Salamis
Average goals in match▲ 4.253.03▲ 4.25
Both teams scored▲ 75%57%▲ 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%67%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 25%28%▼ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%73%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%87%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.53
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. APOELSubstitutionOn: Stavros GeorgiouOff: Filip Đuričić
  2. APOELYellow cardAntonín Barák
  3. APOELYellow cardJuan Sastre Vanrell
  4. Nea SalamisYellow cardAlberto Varó Lara
  5. APOELYellow cardKonstantinos Stafylidis
  6. APOELYellow cardGabriel Maioli da Silva

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of APOEL vs Nea Salamis?

The First Division match finished APOEL 2:1 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before APOEL vs Nea Salamis?

APOEL score 2.50 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 2.00. The First Division average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 75% of APOEL's matches and 75% of Nea Salamis's.

What form are APOEL and Nea Salamis in?

Over the last 5 games APOEL have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Nea Salamis 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APOEL vs Nea Salamis?

The statistical background for APOEL vs Nea Salamis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.