Cyprus - First DivisionAlphamega StadiumData current as of 15 October 2026

Apollon vs Nea Salamis: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Apollon vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Apollon play Nea Salamis in First Division (Cyprus). The match date is 17 October 2026. Venue: Alphamega Stadium.

Current form

Apollon: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Nea Salamis: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Apollon scores 2.00 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Nea Salamis scores 1.80 and concedes 2.20. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Apollon 80%, Nea Salamis 80%. Over 2.5: Apollon 80%, Nea Salamis 100%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.13. Apollon: 8.0 shots per match, Nea Salamis: 10.4.

Match halves

Apollon: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Nea Salamis: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Apollon: 31-45+ (4 goals). Nea Salamis: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(1.30)
(4.75)
(8.00)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.8
ApollonNea Salamis
1.2Goals conceded / match2.2
ApollonNea Salamis
50%Average possession41%
ApollonNea Salamis
3.6Shots on target / match3.4
ApollonNea Salamis

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match10.4
ApollonNea Salamis
3.6Shots on target3.4
ApollonNea Salamis
25%Shot conversion17.3%
ApollonNea Salamis
50%Possession41%
ApollonNea Salamis
1.13xG for1.24
ApollonNea Salamis
1.46xG against1.74
ApollonNea Salamis

Shooting quality

Apollon: Efficient finishingNea Salamis: Counter-attacking
ApollonNea Salamis
Accuracy (shots on target)45%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.53

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Apollon is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Apollon · 0.8 pts / match - Nea Salamis

Apollon
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W60% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Nea Salamis
DLLWL
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
DLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Apollon is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Apollon · 1.8 goals / match - Nea Salamis

Apollon is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Apollon · 2.2 goals / match - Nea Salamis

Apollon scoring profile: very strong

Apollon scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Apollon keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

10Goals scored (season)9
ApollonNea Salamis
6Goals conceded (season)11
ApollonNea Salamis
3.2Average goals in match4
ApollonNea Salamis
10Goals scored (last 5)9
ApollonNea Salamis
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
ApollonNea Salamis

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
ApollonNea Salamis
80%2 goals40%
ApollonNea Salamis
40%3 goals40%
ApollonNea Salamis
0%4 goals0%
ApollonNea Salamis

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
ApollonNea Salamis
40%2 goals80%
ApollonNea Salamis
0%3 goals40%
ApollonNea Salamis
0%4 goals20%
ApollonNea Salamis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

80%BTTS at half-time20%
ApollonNea Salamis
20%BTTS in both halves20%
ApollonNea Salamis
60%Scored in both halves40%
ApollonNea Salamis

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
ApollonNea Salamis
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
ApollonNea Salamis
80%BTTS - last 580%
ApollonNea Salamis

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
ApollonNea Salamis
80%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
ApollonNea Salamis
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
ApollonNea Salamis

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ApollonNea Salamis
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
ApollonNea Salamis
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
ApollonNea Salamis

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Apollon is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Apollon · 1.2 pts / match - Nea Salamis

Apollon - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Nea Salamis - half-time state
40% leading0% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.2
ApollonNea Salamis
1Goals scored (1st half)0.6
ApollonNea Salamis
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)1
ApollonNea Salamis
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.6
ApollonNea Salamis
20%Clean sheet before half-time20%
ApollonNea Salamis
20%No goal before half-time60%
ApollonNea Salamis

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1
ApollonNea Salamis
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
ApollonNea Salamis
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
ApollonNea Salamis
1.4Average goals (2nd half)2.4
ApollonNea Salamis
60%Clean sheet after half-time20%
ApollonNea Salamis
40%No goal after half-time0%
ApollonNea Salamis

Apollon - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Apollon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 5
Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Apollon
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Apollon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.87
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

ApollonLigaNea Salamis
Average goals in match▲ 3.203.00▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▲ 80%60%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 80%69%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 20%26%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%71%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 80%89%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
66%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Apollon and Nea Salamis play?

Apollon face Nea Salamis on 17 October 2026 in First Division at Alphamega Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Apollon vs Nea Salamis?

Apollon score 2.00 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.80. The First Division average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Apollon's matches and 80% of Nea Salamis's.

What form are Apollon and Nea Salamis in?

Over the last 5 games Apollon have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Nea Salamis 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Apollon vs Nea Salamis?

The statistical background for Apollon vs Nea Salamis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.