Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

APR vs Amagaju: match statistics

APR crest
APR
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Amagaju crest
Amagaju
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

APR are the clear favorites for this match, sitting top of the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 10 draws, and only 2 losses. The hosts are unbeaten in their last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and display dominant home form with a 73% win rate in home games and 55% clean sheets. Amagaju are in 17th place with a very poor away record - just 33% wins, 58% of matches without scoring, and a goal difference of -8. The difference in attacking quality is huge: APR average 1.55 goals per home match with an xG of 1.35, while Amagaju score only 0.5 goals per away game with an xG of 0.75. All statistical indicators, from ball possession (54% vs 47%), to shot accuracy (18% vs 12%), to recent form, clearly point to the hosts' advantage.

APR vs Amagaju: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

APR played Amagaju in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 20 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

APR: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Amagaju: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

APR scores 1.42 and concedes 0.79 goals per match. Amagaju scores 0.48 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: APR 54%, Amagaju 26%. Over 2.5: APR 46%, Amagaju 17%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

APR has higher xG: 1.26 vs 0.91. APR: 8.0 shots per match, Amagaju: 5.1.

Match halves

APR: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.75. Amagaju: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.26.

Goals by minute

APR: 31-45+ (9 goals). Amagaju: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

APR are the clear favorites for this match, sitting top of the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 10 draws, and only 2 losses. The hosts are unbeaten in their last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and display dominant home form with a 73% win rate in home games and 55% clean sheets. Amagaju are in 17th place with a very poor away record - just 33% wins, 58% of matches without scoring, and a goal difference of -8. The difference in attacking quality is huge: APR average 1.55 goals per home match with an xG of 1.35, while Amagaju score only 0.5 goals per away game with an xG of 0.75. All statistical indicators, from ball possession (54% vs 47%), to shot accuracy (18% vs 12%), to recent form, clearly point to the hosts' advantage.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
APRAmagaju
5Shots6
APRAmagaju
2Shots on target0
APRAmagaju
0.93xG0.7
APRAmagaju
2Corners1
APRAmagaju
62Dangerous attacks42
APRAmagaju
-1Fouls-1
APRAmagaju
-1Cards-1
APRAmagaju

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.42Goals scored / match0.48
APRAmagaju
0.79Goals conceded / match1.22
APRAmagaju
52%Average possession45%
APRAmagaju
2.79Shots on target / match1.35
APRAmagaju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.04Shots per match5.13
APRAmagaju
2.79Shots on target1.35
APRAmagaju
17.6%Shot conversion9.3%
APRAmagaju
52%Possession45%
APRAmagaju
1.26xG for0.91
APRAmagaju
0.96xG against1.01
APRAmagaju

Shooting quality

APR: Efficient finishingAmagaju: Balanced
APRAmagaju
Accuracy (shots on target)35%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.510.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APR is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - APR · 1.6 pts / match - Amagaju

APR
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W42% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-2
1.92 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Amagaju
DLWDW
Season result split
22% W26% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-12
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APR is 196% better for: goals scored per match.

1.42 goals / match - APR · 0.48 goals / match - Amagaju

APR is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.79 goals / match - APR · 1.22 goals / match - Amagaju

APR scoring profile: very strong

APR scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Amagaju keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

Amagaju scoring profile: more difficult

Amagaju scores in 39% of matches (9 of 23 matches), while APR keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).

34Goals scored (season)11
APRAmagaju
19Goals conceded (season)28
APRAmagaju
2.21Average goals in match1.7
APRAmagaju
8Goals scored (last 5)4
APRAmagaju
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
APRAmagaju

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal39%
APRAmagaju
54%2 goals9%
APRAmagaju
8%3 goals0%
APRAmagaju
0%4 goals0%
APRAmagaju

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal74%
APRAmagaju
17%2 goals22%
APRAmagaju
4%3 goals4%
APRAmagaju
0%4 goals4%
APRAmagaju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
APRAmagaju
0%BTTS in both halves0%
APRAmagaju
21%Scored in both halves9%
APRAmagaju

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
APRAmagaju
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
APRAmagaju
80%BTTS - last 540%
APRAmagaju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
APRAmagaju
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
APRAmagaju
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
APRAmagaju

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
APRAmagaju
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
APRAmagaju
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
APRAmagaju

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

APR is 86% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / match - APR · 0.83 pts / match - Amagaju

APR - half-time state
38% leading42% draw21% trailing
Amagaju - half-time state
9% leading57% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)0.83
APRAmagaju
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.22
APRAmagaju
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
APRAmagaju
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.87
APRAmagaju
67%Clean sheet before half-time52%
APRAmagaju
54%No goal before half-time78%
APRAmagaju

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)1.09
APRAmagaju
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.26
APRAmagaju
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
APRAmagaju
1.08Average goals (2nd half)0.83
APRAmagaju
67%Clean sheet after half-time61%
APRAmagaju
46%No goal after half-time74%
APRAmagaju

APR - second-half results

42% W38% R21% P
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amagaju - second-half results

22% W43% R35% P
19
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding244%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

APR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-3+6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Amagaju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

APR
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
9
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
6
0
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Amagaju
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
2
6
16-30
1
4
31-45
0
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

APR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Amagaju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

APRLigaAmagaju
Average goals in match 2.212.09 1.70
Both teams scored 54%46% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%36% 17%
Clean sheets 42%34% 26%
Goal before half-time 67%62% 57%
Goal after half-time 75%70% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.11
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Djibril Cheick Ouattara⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. APRGoalDjibril Cheick Ouattara

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: APR 1 - 0 - 0 Amagaju. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of APR vs Amagaju?

The National Soccer League match finished APR 1:0 Amagaju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before APR vs Amagaju?

APR score 1.42 goals per game on average and Amagaju 0.48. The National Soccer League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 54% of APR's matches and 26% of Amagaju's.

What form are APR and Amagaju in?

Over the last 5 games APR have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Amagaju 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APR vs Amagaju?

The statistical background for APR vs Amagaju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.