APS Bomet vs Posta Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

APS Bomet played Posta Rangers in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 12 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

APS Bomet: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Posta Rangers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

APS Bomet scores 1.08 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Posta Rangers scores 1.17 and concedes 1.25. League average: 1.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: APS Bomet 50%, Posta Rangers 50%. Over 2.5: APS Bomet 42%, Posta Rangers 50%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Posta Rangers has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.16. APS Bomet: 6.2 shots per match, Posta Rangers: 8.9.

Match halves

APS Bomet: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.25. Posta Rangers: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

APS Bomet: 0-15 (9 goals). Posta Rangers: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 1.94 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
APS BometPosta Rangers
10Shots12
APS BometPosta Rangers
3Shots on target6
APS BometPosta Rangers
1.32xG1.63
APS BometPosta Rangers
1Corners1
APS BometPosta Rangers
63Dangerous attacks60
APS BometPosta Rangers
-1Fouls-1
APS BometPosta Rangers
-1Cards-1
APS BometPosta Rangers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

APS BometPosta Rangers
1.08Goals scored / match1.17
APS BometPosta Rangers
1.17Goals conceded / match1.25
APS BometPosta Rangers
40%Average possession48%
APS BometPosta Rangers
2.5Shots on target / match3.08
APS BometPosta Rangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.17Shots per match8.92
APS BometPosta Rangers
2.5Shots on target3.08
APS BometPosta Rangers
17.6%Shot conversion13.1%
APS BometPosta Rangers
40%Possession48%
APS BometPosta Rangers
1.16xG for1.25
APS BometPosta Rangers
1.43xG against1.68
APS BometPosta Rangers

Shooting quality

APS Bomet: Counter-attackingPosta Rangers: Efficient finishing
APS BometPosta Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)41%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APS Bomet is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - APS Bomet · 1.4 pts / match - Posta Rangers

APS Bomet
DLWDW
Season result split
33% W25% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-5
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Posta Rangers
LDLWW
Season result split
42% W33% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-3
1.58 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Posta Rangers is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.08 goals / match - APS Bomet · 1.17 goals / match - Posta Rangers

APS Bomet is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - APS Bomet · 1.25 goals / match - Posta Rangers

APS Bomet scoring profile: strong

APS Bomet scores in 58% of matches (7 of 12 matches), while Posta Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

Posta Rangers scoring profile: strong

Posta Rangers scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while APS Bomet keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

13Goals scored (season)14
APS BometPosta Rangers
14Goals conceded (season)15
APS BometPosta Rangers
2.25Average goals in match2.42
APS BometPosta Rangers
4Goals scored (last 5)4
APS BometPosta Rangers
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
APS BometPosta Rangers

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal67%
APS BometPosta Rangers
33%2 goals50%
APS BometPosta Rangers
8%3 goals0%
APS BometPosta Rangers
8%4 goals0%
APS BometPosta Rangers

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
APS BometPosta Rangers
25%2 goals42%
APS BometPosta Rangers
8%3 goals8%
APS BometPosta Rangers
8%4 goals0%
APS BometPosta Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
APS BometPosta Rangers
8%BTTS in both halves8%
APS BometPosta Rangers
8%Scored in both halves17%
APS BometPosta Rangers

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
APS BometPosta Rangers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
APS BometPosta Rangers
40%BTTS - last 520%
APS BometPosta Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

25%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
APS BometPosta Rangers
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
APS BometPosta Rangers
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
APS BometPosta Rangers

2nd half

42%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
APS BometPosta Rangers
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
APS BometPosta Rangers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
APS BometPosta Rangers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Posta Rangers is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - APS Bomet · 1.5 pts / match - Posta Rangers

APS Bomet - half-time state
0% leading83% draw17% trailing
Posta Rangers - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.5
APS BometPosta Rangers
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.58
APS BometPosta Rangers
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
APS BometPosta Rangers
0.58Average goals (1st half)0.92
APS BometPosta Rangers
75%Clean sheet before half-time67%
APS BometPosta Rangers
83%No goal before half-time58%
APS BometPosta Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.83
APS BometPosta Rangers
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
APS BometPosta Rangers
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
APS BometPosta Rangers
0.58Average goals (2nd half)1.08
APS BometPosta Rangers
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
APS BometPosta Rangers
75%No goal after half-time75%
APS BometPosta Rangers

APS Bomet - second-half results

8% W75% R17% P
10
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Posta Rangers - second-half results

8% W58% R33% P
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

APS Bomet - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.00.6
1 goal0%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Posta Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.40.4
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

APS Bomet
ScoredConceded
9
9
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Posta Rangers
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

APS Bomet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 69% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Posta Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

APS BometLigaPosta Rangers
Average goals in match 2.251.94 2.42
Both teams scored 50%40% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%30% 50%
Clean sheets 25%37% 25%
Goal before half-time 25%39% 58%
Goal after half-time 42%41% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.94
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+-15%
Home attack advantage
+-18%
Home defence advantage
+-17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
39%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
41%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of APS Bomet vs Posta Rangers?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished APS Bomet 0:0 Posta Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before APS Bomet vs Posta Rangers?

APS Bomet score 1.08 goals per game on average and Posta Rangers 1.17. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 50% of APS Bomet's matches and 50% of Posta Rangers's.

What form are APS Bomet and Posta Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games APS Bomet have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Posta Rangers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APS Bomet vs Posta Rangers?

The statistical background for APS Bomet vs Posta Rangers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.