Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

APS Bomet vs Shabana: match statistics

APS Bomet crest
APS Bomet
3 : 3half-time 0:0
Shabana crest
Shabana
120%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
250%(0.00)

Shabana demonstrates decidedly better form and statistics both in the context of the entire season and the last five matches. The visitors boast an impressive away record with 50% wins and 50% draws without a single defeat, while APS Bomet loses 63% of matches at home and wins only 13%. The difference in offensive quality is distinct—Shabana scores an average of 1.25 goals away, whereas APS Bomet only scores 0.38 at home, with the hosts failing to score in 63% of home matches. Form in the last five meetings also favors the visitors (2.2 points per match) compared to just 1 point for the hosts. Additionally, Shabana has better statistics in shots on target average (3.25 vs 2.38) and a more favorable goal difference (+5 vs -5), making them the clear favorite for this clash.

APS Bomet vs Shabana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

APS Bomet played Shabana in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 21 January 2026. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

APS Bomet: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Shabana: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

APS Bomet scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Shabana scores 1.12 and concedes 0.88. League average: 1.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: APS Bomet 53%, Shabana 47%. Over 2.5: APS Bomet 41%, Shabana 35%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Shabana has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.12. APS Bomet: 6.5 shots per match, Shabana: 10.2.

Match halves

APS Bomet: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.24. Shabana: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.24.

Goals by minute

APS Bomet: 0-15 (12 goals). Shabana: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 1.96 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Shabana demonstrates decidedly better form and statistics both in the context of the entire season and the last five matches. The visitors boast an impressive away record with 50% wins and 50% draws without a single defeat, while APS Bomet loses 63% of matches at home and wins only 13%. The difference in offensive quality is distinct—Shabana scores an average of 1.25 goals away, whereas APS Bomet only scores 0.38 at home, with the hosts failing to score in 63% of home matches. Form in the last five meetings also favors the visitors (2.2 points per match) compared to just 1 point for the hosts. Additionally, Shabana has better statistics in shots on target average (3.25 vs 2.38) and a more favorable goal difference (+5 vs -5), making them the clear favorite for this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
APS BometShabana
10Shots12
APS BometShabana
4Shots on target6
APS BometShabana
1.3xG1.53
APS BometShabana
5Corners5
APS BometShabana
54Dangerous attacks49
APS BometShabana
-1Fouls-1
APS BometShabana
-1Cards-1
APS BometShabana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.12
APS BometShabana
1.29Goals conceded / match0.88
APS BometShabana
43%Average possession47%
APS BometShabana
2.41Shots on target / match3.29
APS BometShabana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.47Shots per match10.24
APS BometShabana
2.41Shots on target3.29
APS BometShabana
15.5%Shot conversion10.9%
APS BometShabana
43%Possession47%
APS BometShabana
1.12xG for1.43
APS BometShabana
1.35xG against1.37
APS BometShabana

Shooting quality

APS Bomet: Counter-attackingShabana: Balanced
APS BometShabana
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shabana is 350% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - APS Bomet · 1.8 pts / match - Shabana

APS Bomet
DLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W29% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Shabana
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
41% W35% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-4
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shabana is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - APS Bomet · 1.12 goals / match - Shabana

Shabana is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - APS Bomet · 0.88 goals / match - Shabana

APS Bomet scoring profile: mixed

APS Bomet scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Shabana keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 matches).

Shabana scoring profile: very strong

Shabana scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while APS Bomet keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)19
APS BometShabana
22Goals conceded (season)15
APS BometShabana
2.29Average goals in match2
APS BometShabana
4Goals scored (last 5)6
APS BometShabana
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
APS BometShabana

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal76%
APS BometShabana
29%2 goals18%
APS BometShabana
6%3 goals12%
APS BometShabana
6%4 goals6%
APS BometShabana

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal53%
APS BometShabana
29%2 goals29%
APS BometShabana
12%3 goals6%
APS BometShabana
12%4 goals0%
APS BometShabana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
APS BometShabana
6%BTTS in both halves6%
APS BometShabana
6%Scored in both halves6%
APS BometShabana

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
APS BometShabana
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
APS BometShabana
60%BTTS - last 540%
APS BometShabana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

18%Min. 1 goal before half-time41%
APS BometShabana
12%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
APS BometShabana
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
APS BometShabana

2nd half

41%Min. 1 goal after half-time35%
APS BometShabana
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
APS BometShabana
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
APS BometShabana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shabana is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / match - APS Bomet · 1.53 pts / match - Shabana

APS Bomet - half-time state
0% leading88% draw12% trailing
Shabana - half-time state
29% leading65% draw6% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per match (1st half)1.53
APS BometShabana
0.12Goals scored (1st half)0.47
APS BometShabana
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.18
APS BometShabana
0.41Average goals (1st half)0.65
APS BometShabana
82%Clean sheet before half-time82%
APS BometShabana
88%No goal before half-time65%
APS BometShabana

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.12
APS BometShabana
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
APS BometShabana
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
APS BometShabana
0.65Average goals (2nd half)0.53
APS BometShabana
65%Clean sheet after half-time76%
APS BometShabana
76%No goal after half-time76%
APS BometShabana

APS Bomet - second-half results

6% W71% R24% P
15
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shabana - second-half results

12% W76% R12% P
26
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

APS Bomet - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.00.8
1 goal0%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Shabana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.20.0
1 goal20%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

APS Bomet
ScoredConceded
12
14
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Shabana
ScoredConceded
12
7
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+180%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

APS Bomet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 71% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Shabana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 63% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

APS BometLigaShabana
Average goals in match 2.291.96 2.00
Both teams scored 53%42% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%32% 35%
Clean sheets 24%36% 47%
Goal before half-time 18%32% 41%
Goal after half-time 41%35% 35%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.96
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defence advantage
+-10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
32%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
35%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: APS Bomet 0 - 0 - 1 Shabana. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Shabana
4 : 2
APS Bomet

FAQ

What was the result of APS Bomet vs Shabana?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished APS Bomet 3:3 Shabana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before APS Bomet vs Shabana?

APS Bomet score 1.00 goals per game on average and Shabana 1.12. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 53% of APS Bomet's matches and 47% of Shabana's.

What form are APS Bomet and Shabana in?

Over the last 5 games APS Bomet have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Shabana 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APS Bomet vs Shabana?

The statistical background for APS Bomet vs Shabana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.