Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Arba Minch Kenema vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics

120%(3.55)
X35%(2.75)
245%(2.15)

Fasil Ketema clearly dominates this clash in terms of all key indicators. The hosts, Arba Minch Kenema, have not won a single match this season, sit in last place in the table, and have scored merely 5 goals while conceding 17. Their home form is catastrophic with 0% wins and as many as 86% matches without scoring a goal. Fasil Ketema ranks 4th, possesses a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in the season), and an impressive 86% clean sheets away. Although the guests have a tendency for draws on the road (71%), the distinct quality advantage and form (1.2 PPG in the last 5 matches versus 0.6 for the hosts) as well as a positive goal difference (+3) in away matches argue for their victory. xG statistics also favor the guests (1.25 xG For versus 0.89 for the hosts), confirming their offensive advantage.

Arba Minch Kenema vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arba Minch Kenema play Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 25 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Arba Minch Kenema: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arba Minch Kenema 42%, Fasil Ketema 26%. Over 2.5: Arba Minch Kenema 29%, Fasil Ketema 18%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.12. Arba Minch Kenema: 7.3 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.2.

Match halves

Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.39. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Arba Minch Kenema: 31-45+ (8 goals). Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Fasil Ketema clearly dominates this clash in terms of all key indicators. The hosts, Arba Minch Kenema, have not won a single match this season, sit in last place in the table, and have scored merely 5 goals while conceding 17. Their home form is catastrophic with 0% wins and as many as 86% matches without scoring a goal. Fasil Ketema ranks 4th, possesses a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in the season), and an impressive 86% clean sheets away. Although the guests have a tendency for draws on the road (71%), the distinct quality advantage and form (1.2 PPG in the last 5 matches versus 0.6 for the hosts) as well as a positive goal difference (+3) in away matches argue for their victory. xG statistics also favor the guests (1.25 xG For versus 0.89 for the hosts), confirming their offensive advantage.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
10Shots9
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
5Shots on target5
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
1.75xG1.5
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
4Corners1
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
105Dangerous attacks80
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
9Fouls21
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0Cards0
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0.79Goals scored / match0.74
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
1.21Goals conceded / match0.74
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
49%Average possession46%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
2.29Shots on target / match2.24
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.26Shots per match7.24
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
2.29Shots on target2.24
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
10.9%Shot conversion10.2%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
49%Possession46%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
1.12xG for1.14
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
1.2xG against1.1
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Arba Minch Kenema: BalancedFasil Ketema: Balanced
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)32%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Arba Minch Kenema
WWLLL
Season result split
18% W37% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-17
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-7-11
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-9-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arba Minch Kenema is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Fasil Ketema is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Arba Minch Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Arba Minch Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: strong

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

30Goals scored (season)28
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
46Goals conceded (season)28
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
2Average goals in match1.47
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal58%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
26%2 goals11%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0%3 goals5%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal45%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
32%2 goals21%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
16%3 goals8%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
3%4 goals0%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Arba Minch Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time8%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
16%Scored in both halves8%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
40%BTTS - last 50%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time34%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

2nd half

58%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Arba Minch Kenema - half-time state
24% leading34% draw42% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.42
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
1.03Average goals (1st half)0.45
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
53%Clean sheet before half-time87%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
66%No goal before half-time71%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
0.97Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
58%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema
66%No goal after half-time63%
Arba Minch KenemaFasil Ketema

Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arba Minch Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arba Minch Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
9
16-30
8
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arba Minch Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Arba Minch KenemaLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 2.001.78 1.47
Both teams scored 42%40% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%28% 18%
Clean sheets 29%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 71%56% 34%
Goal after half-time 58%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arba Minch Kenema 0 - 0 - 1 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Arba Minch Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Arba Minch Kenema 2:3 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arba Minch Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

Arba Minch Kenema score 0.79 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.74. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Arba Minch Kenema's matches and 26% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Arba Minch Kenema and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Arba Minch Kenema have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arba Minch Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.