Arda vs Montana: match statistics
Arda vs Montana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Arda played Montana in First League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Arda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Montana: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Arda scores 1.11 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Montana scores 0.52 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.34 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Arda 26%, Montana 37%. Over 2.5: Arda 33%, Montana 41%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Arda has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.17. Arda: 11.4 shots per match, Montana: 9.2.
Match halves
Arda: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.48. Montana: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.30.
Goals by minute
Arda: 31-45+ (8 goals). Montana: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First League: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Arda is 7th in the table while Montana is 16th; in the last 5 matches Arda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 7 goals, whereas Montana has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses and has not scored. At home Arda averages 14 shots per match, with 4.31 on target and 57% possession, and their home xG is 1.72 (they actually score 0.92 goals per home match), while Montana away averages 8.5 shots with 2.79 on target, 43% possession, xG 1.13 and only 0.36 goals per away match. Defensively Arda concedes only 0.85 goals per home match and has 46% clean sheets, whereas Montana concedes 1.64 goals away, has 21% clean sheets and fails to score in 64% of away games; the visitors win only 7% of their away matches. The difference in efficiency is evident: shot conversion for the hosts is about 7% versus 4% for the visitors, and the advantage in xG (1.72 vs 1.13) and shots (14 vs 8.5) suggests Arda will create more high-quality chances. Considering the clearly better form (an average of 2.0 points in the last 5 matches versus 0.2 for Montana), superiority in possession, shots and a more stable defense, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - No is the more probable outcome. Montana has failed to score in their last 5 matches (0 goals, 0.0 avg) and posts a season average of 0.36 goals with xG 1.13 and a low conversion rate of 4%. Arda at home in their last five matches has scored 7 goals (1.4 avg) and conceded only 2 (0.4 avg), showing solid form both offensively and defensively. Season BTTS rates are 46% for Arda and 29% for Montana, but the last 5 games reveal a clear trend: 20% (Arda) vs 0% (Montana) for BTTS, indicating a reduced likelihood of both teams scoring. Additionally Arda generates 1.22 xG at home and averages 3.15 shots on target, while Montana records 1.13 xG and 2.79 shots on target with 4% conversion—Montana’s lack of finishing increases the chance of a No Goal outcome. Considering form (Arda: W D L W W, Montana: D L L L L), the recent goals disparity (7 vs 0) and conversion metrics, I assign an 80% probability to BTTS - No and 20% to BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated expected goals from xG are approximately 1.46 for Arda (xG_for_home 1.22 vs xG_against_away 1.69 → average 1.455) and 1.32 for Montana (xG_for_away 1.13 vs xG_against_home 1.52 → average 1.325), combined ≈2.78 goals. This exceeds the league average of 2.35 and aligns with a very high share of matches with over 0.5 goals: Arda 85% and Montana 86%, which increases the likelihood of additional scoring. Seasonal distributions also show Over 1.5 occurs in 62% of Arda’s matches and 50% of Montana’s, while Over 2.5 is only 38%/43% — hence a stronger signal for the 1.5 line than for 2.5 or 3.5. Additionally, Arda scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 1.4) and conceded 2, while Montana failed to score in the last 5 (0.0) and conceded 6; shot and conversion metrics favor the home side (Arda 9.92 shots, 3.15 on target, conversion 7.0% vs Montana 8.5, 2.79, 4.0%). A Poisson model with λ=2.78 estimates ~77% for Over 1.5, ~53% for Over 2.5 and ~30% for Over 3.5, therefore I recommend backing the over on the 1.5 line as the strongest data-driven signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In 4 of Arda’s last 5 matches the score was level at half-time (80%), and Montana also had a half-time draw in 4 of their last 5 fixtures (80%), indicating a strong tendency toward draws in the first half. In the second halves of their last 5 matches Arda averaged 1.0 goal and won the second half in 60% of cases, while Montana averaged 0.0 goals and did not win any second halves. Arda has a higher xG of 1.22 versus Montana’s 1.13 and a better shot conversion rate (7% vs 4%), and in the last 5 matches Arda won 3 of 5 (60%) while Montana did not win any (0%), giving the home side an advantage in the closing stages. Considering the draw-prone nature of first halves (80% in the last 5) and Arda’s stronger second half performance (average 1.0 goal and 60% second-half wins), the most likely scenario is a half-time draw followed by a home win after 90 minutes (X/1), hence stronger odds for X/1 (~48%), followed by X/X (24%) and 1/1 (12%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Arda | Montana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Arda is 900% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Arda · 0.2 pts / match - Montana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arda is 113% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - Arda · 0.52 goals / match - Montana
Arda is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Arda · 1.56 goals / match - Montana
Arda scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 matches).
Montana scores in 48% of matches (13 of 27 matches), while Arda keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Arda
Over / Under - Montana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arda is 86% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / match - Arda · 0.7 pts / match - Montana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Montana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Arda
Montana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First League).
Teams vs league
| Arda | Liga | Montana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.04 | 2.34 | ▼ 2.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 26% | 44% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 45% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 35% | ▼ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | • 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 72% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Arda 0 - 1 - 0 Montana. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Arda vs Montana?
The First League match finished Arda 2:1 Montana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arda vs Montana?
Arda score 1.11 goals per game on average and Montana 0.52. The First League average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Arda's matches and 37% of Montana's.
What form are Arda and Montana in?
Over the last 5 games Arda have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Montana 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arda vs Montana?
The statistical background for Arda vs Montana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


