Indonesia - Liga 1Stadion KanjuruhanData current as of 15 October 2026

Arema vs Bhayangkara: match statistics

Arema crest
Arema
2 : 2half-time 0:2
Bhayangkara crest
Bhayangkara

Arema vs Bhayangkara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arema played Bhayangkara in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Stadion Kanjuruhan. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Arema: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match. Bhayangkara: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arema scores 2.67 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Bhayangkara scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arema 67%, Bhayangkara 67%. Over 2.5: Arema 67%, Bhayangkara 33%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Bhayangkara has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.21. Arema: 6.0 shots per match, Bhayangkara: 11.0.

Match halves

Arema: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67. Bhayangkara: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Arema: 0-15 (2 goals). Bhayangkara: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Arema hold a slight home advantage: they average 2.5 goals scored and 0.5 conceded at home, while Bhayangkara score and concede 2 goals per game away. The hosts are unbeaten at home so far, recording one win and one draw, while the visitors drew their only away match to date. The quality of chances created also edges in Arema’s favour, with an average home xG of 1.34 compared with Bhayangkara’s 1.17 away. However, the visitors have been in better form over their last five matches: they have won twice and scored 13 goals, while Arema have won once and netted 9. Therefore, a home win is the most likely outcome, although the visitors’ scoring form and the small sample of away matches played so far call for a cautious assessment.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Goals from both teams are more likely: in their last 5 matches, both Arema and Bhayangkara recorded BTTS in 60% of games, averaging 1.8 and 2.6 goals scored, respectively. The hosts create chances worth an average xG of 1.61, while the visitors allow their opponents an xG of 1.41, supporting Arema’s chances of finding the net. Bhayangkara also have a case in attack, averaging 2.0 goals scored, while Arema have conceded an average of 1.6 goals in their last 5 matches. The biggest risk to this pick is the hosts’ season-long defensive record: they concede just 0.5 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of games. Even so, the attacking effectiveness of both sides and the higher number of goals Arema have conceded recently point to a scenario in which both teams score (BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for at least two goals: every match played by either team so far has finished with over 1.5 goals. Arema average 1.5 goals at home, while Bhayangkara concede 2.0 away; the hosts also register an xG of 1.61 compared with the 1.41 xG conceded by the visitors. Bhayangkara average 2.0 goals away, although Arema’s defence concede just 0.5 at home, so I estimate the visitors’ tally more conservatively at 1.2 goals. Over the last five matches, the average total was 3.4 goals in Arema games and 4.0 in Bhayangkara games, yet only 60% of those matches went over 2.5 goals. This gives Over 1.5 a clearer edge than the higher goal lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by an Arema win is the most likely outcome. The hosts have failed to score in the first half of either of their two home matches so far, while Bhayangkara have not scored before the break in three of their last five games, limiting the chances of either side taking an early lead. After the break, Arema have averaged 1.5 goals at home and won both second halves, whereas Bhayangkara conceded after half-time and failed to score themselves in their only away match. The hosts’ advantage is also supported by the underlying chance-quality figures: their average xG is 1.61 compared with their opponents’ 1.17, while their average xG conceded is 0.68 against 1.41 for the visitors. However, the X/1 HT/FT pick remains uncertain due to the small sample of home and away matches, as well as the fact that Bhayangkara have averaged 1.6 goals after the break across their last five games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
AremaBhayangkara
11Shots14
AremaBhayangkara
5Shots on target6
AremaBhayangkara
1.34xG1.63
AremaBhayangkara
2Corners7
AremaBhayangkara
41Dangerous attacks46
AremaBhayangkara
8Fouls19
AremaBhayangkara
2Cards2
AremaBhayangkara

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.67Goals scored / match1.67
AremaBhayangkara
1.33Goals conceded / match1
AremaBhayangkara
41%Average possession54%
AremaBhayangkara
2.33Shots on target / match4.67
AremaBhayangkara

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match11
AremaBhayangkara
2.33Shots on target4.67
AremaBhayangkara
44.4%Shot conversion15.2%
AremaBhayangkara
41%Possession54%
AremaBhayangkara
1.21xG for1.46
AremaBhayangkara
2.05xG against0.92
AremaBhayangkara

Shooting quality

Arema: Counter-attackingBhayangkara: Efficient finishing
AremaBhayangkara
Accuracy (shots on target)39%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.150.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema
WDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.7Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 2.05BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Bhayangkara
DDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

2.67 goals / match - Arema · 1.67 goals / match - Bhayangkara

Bhayangkara is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Arema · 1 goals / match - Bhayangkara

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Bhayangkara keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Bhayangkara scoring profile: very strong

Bhayangkara scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

8Goals scored (season)5
AremaBhayangkara
4Goals conceded (season)3
AremaBhayangkara
4Average goals in match2.67
AremaBhayangkara
8Goals scored (last 5)5
AremaBhayangkara
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
AremaBhayangkara

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
AremaBhayangkara
67%2 goals67%
AremaBhayangkara
67%3 goals0%
AremaBhayangkara
33%4 goals0%
AremaBhayangkara

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
AremaBhayangkara
33%2 goals33%
AremaBhayangkara
33%3 goals0%
AremaBhayangkara
0%4 goals0%
AremaBhayangkara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

67%BTTS at half-time33%
AremaBhayangkara
33%BTTS in both halves0%
AremaBhayangkara
67%Scored in both halves0%
AremaBhayangkara

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AremaBhayangkara
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AremaBhayangkara
67%BTTS - last 567%
AremaBhayangkara

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
AremaBhayangkara
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AremaBhayangkara
67%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
AremaBhayangkara

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AremaBhayangkara
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
AremaBhayangkara
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AremaBhayangkara

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / match - Arema · 1.33 pts / match - Bhayangkara

Arema - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
Bhayangkara - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per match (1st half)1.33
AremaBhayangkara
2Goals scored (1st half)0.67
AremaBhayangkara
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
AremaBhayangkara
2.67Average goals (1st half)1.33
AremaBhayangkara
33%Clean sheet before half-time33%
AremaBhayangkara
0%No goal before half-time67%
AremaBhayangkara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)2
AremaBhayangkara
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1
AremaBhayangkara
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
AremaBhayangkara
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
AremaBhayangkara
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
AremaBhayangkara
33%No goal after half-time33%
AremaBhayangkara

Arema - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
7
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding49%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bhayangkara - second-half results

67% W0% D33% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.331.33
Goals scored / match2.00.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.7
Average goals in match2.71.3
1 goal100%67%
2 goals100%33%
3 goals67%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal0%33%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 67% - Half-time goals total: 6
Bhayangkara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.332.00
Goals scored / match0.71.0
Goals conceded / match0.70.3
Average goals in match1.31.3
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arema
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Bhayangkara
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
125%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.84
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Bhayangkara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AremaLigaBhayangkara
Average goals in match▲ 4.002.67• 2.67
Both teams scored▲ 67%60%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%47%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 33%20%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%77%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%77%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BhayangkaraYellow cardMatías Ernesto Ocampo Ornizún
  2. AremaSubstitutionOn: Arkhan FikriOff: Hansamu Yama Pranata
  3. BhayangkaraSubstitutionOn: Nehar SadikiOff: Kevin Leonel Sibille
  4. BhayangkaraYellow cardMauricio Andrés Vera
  5. AremaSubstitutionOn: Leo GuntaraOff: Johan Ahmad Farisi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Arema 1 - 0 - 1 Bhayangkara. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Bhayangkara
2 : 1
Arema
Arema
2 : 1
Bhayangkara

FAQ

What was the result of Arema vs Bhayangkara?

The Liga 1 match finished Arema 2:2 Bhayangkara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Arema and Bhayangkara?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Arema won 1, Bhayangkara won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Bhayangkara?

Arema score 2.67 goals per game on average and Bhayangkara 1.67. The Liga 1 average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Arema's matches and 67% of Bhayangkara's.

What form are Arema and Bhayangkara in?

Over the last 5 games Arema have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Bhayangkara 1-2-0 (1.67 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Bhayangkara?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.